|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) France, CNT-ait: Anarchosyndicalisme! #181 - Reform or Revolution? (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Mon, 29 May 2023 08:57:03 +0300
It has been a long time since a government project has sparked such
mobilizations. Three, four million demonstrators. It is enormous. The French are
very angry. More than eighty percent of workers are, according to official
polling institutes, opposed to the reform of their pensions. Eighty percent means
that at the very least, forty to fifty million people are absolutely opposed to
raising the retirement age to 64. But then, where are they? Why don't they join
the protests? Why don't they make their opposition clearly heard? Why do they
accept (because to be silent is to accept) without saying a word what they
consider unfair? Why do they resign?
These are questions of this kind that, already in the sixteenth century, the
young Étienne de la Boétie asked himself. How is it, he said, that the people who
produce the wealth and hold the power agree to be governed and martyred by
tyrants? To answer this, he invented the concept of "voluntary servitude". The
vast majority of individuals accept his condition as a dominated person and this
acceptance is their doing.
A precision is essential: it is certainly voluntary, but above all the
consequence of the indoctrination, the conditioning, the brutalization that
people undergo. From our earliest childhood, we are taught to obey the
injunctions of the authorities, never to contest them.
In the eighteenth century, the "philosophers of the Enlightenment", Voltaire,
Diderot, Rousseau, etc. denounced those responsible for this conditioning: the
state, religions, traditions. They explained that they had to be fought and that
only the use of Reason would make it possible to overcome them. A rational
education, according to them, is what the people need to dissipate the darkness
of obscurantism and free them from the chains of slavery.
In the nineteenth century, thinkers like Proudhon, Marx, Bakunin and many others,
accompanying the reflections of the nascent labor movement, dissected the
functioning of the capitalist system, showed the division of society into
antagonistic social classes, the fundamental character unfair and criminal of
this system and explained that only collective action by the exploited could
overcome it. From the middle of the century, the workers began to organize
themselves and these efforts resulted in the creation by workers of various
nationalities of the First International with the unanimously accepted slogan:
"the emancipation of the workers will be the 'work of the workers themselves'.
This slogan perfectly sums up the program of the First International: To
emancipate oneself is of course to destroy the existing economic and social
system, to abolish the division of society into antagonistic social classes and
the exploitation of man by the man; but it is also to educate oneself, to
cultivate oneself, to develop a rational spirit among the workers, to make them
aware. The initiators of the International believed that a social revolution, the
abolition of the state and of capitalist exploitation required that the great
mass of workers be enlightened, lucid and committed accordingly.
Shortly after the creation of the First International, Marx developed the
absolutely opposite idea that the transformation of society would pass not
through the destruction of the state, but through its conquest, which required
the capture of state institutions by a vanguard, a political party, and this, by
any means (elections, social movement, revolution). Once this objective has been
achieved, the State placed at the service of the interests of the workers is then
responsible for preparing society for the transition to a later stage of
communism. This intermediate stage has been called the dictatorship of the
proletariat. This method no longer requires the mass of workers to be enlightened
and lucid, but just a small fraction, the vanguard, to whom the revolutionary
work is delegated. We therefore move from "the emancipation of the workers will
be the work of the workers themselves" to "building popular power, embodied by
the Party". In the minds of employees, the solution proposed by Marx appeared
infinitely simpler, faster than that requiring the education of the mass of
workers; and suddenly almost the entire world labor movement has set out to build
the Party of the working class and for more than 150 years, everywhere in the
world parties supposed to embody the hopes of the exploited seek to conquer state
power to exercise it for their benefit. Many of these parties have come to power,
either as a result of revolutions or through elections, but these experiences
have always ended in resounding failures, sometimes even in catastrophes. Each
time, it is the populations, in particular the workers and the exploited who have
paid the price.
In 2023 in France, Macron - former minister of a socialist government, elected in
2022 with the support of the unions - shamelessly goes back on all social
advances. Many of those who rightly decry its contempt today were extolling its
merits not long ago.
What is terrible is that history repeats itself: what we are experiencing, we
have already experienced many times before. Things are however clear, as long as
populations choose to give up power to one or a few individuals, without control
to decide what is good for them, it will be so. Macron is a traitor, of course,
but the system of representative democracy which enabled him to come to power,
which meant that an entire people confidently handed over control of their
destiny to him, this representative system is even more infamous .
In view of all the dangers that threaten us, it is urgent to put an end to this
system and replace it with a real democracy, direct democracy. But for that, it
is necessary beforehand that a significant proportion of the population is aware,
thinks that a social revolution is desirable, that it is possible and therefore
undertakes to prepare for it. This tremendous work of raising awareness is the
purpose of anarchosyndicalism.
http://cntaittoulouse.lautre.net/spip.php?article1319
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) Italy, UCADI #169: FRANCE: GOVERNMENT COOK (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(en) Brazil, Lut FOB: Communiqué: DOWN WITH THE FISCAL ADJUSTMENT OF THE LULA-ALCKMIN GOVERNMENT (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center