|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Francais_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkurkish_
The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours
Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Germany, LIKOS: No Military Service for Capital - Speech at the School Strike on March 5, 2026 (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:21:27 +0300
On March 5, school strikes against conscription took place in many
cities. In Osnabrück, 200 people took to the streets. We read the
following speech there: ---- Dear students and their families,
supporters, and people in solidarity, we are standing together in the
streets today to express our resistance. To say: We do not agree with
the militarization of society! We do not agree with rearmament and
conscription! We do not agree that young people should be forced into
military service to defend state and capital interests!
For years, we have been told that we can no longer afford investments in
education, healthcare, or basic public services, that we can no longer
afford the "welfare state." At the same time, an arms industry
subsidized by state investment is being sold to us as economic growth.
Economic growth, so-called boom, the profits of which are appropriated
by the owners of arms companies and thus redistributed further and
further from the bottom to the top. Moreover, these profits are
generated by the most destructive form of production. Weapons can do
nothing but kill and destroy.
Why does the German state subsidize this destructive production? The
state's goal and purpose is to maintain and expand its own power
interests and political and economic spheres of influence. If necessary,
even by military force. The formerly "big brother," the USA, is becoming
increasingly unreliable. This decline of the USA as a de facto world
power is leading to a renegotiation of state spheres of influence and
territorial claims. Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the US invasion of
Venezuela and Iran are expressions of this struggle. And no, to be
perfectly clear: Just because these countries were invaded does not mean
we are on the side of those who rule there! In the division of the
world, European governments also want a "piece of the pie" and are
rearming to regain the ability to independently pursue their imperialist
interests. To this end, society is being militarized.
But what does this militarization do to a society? Even if German
participation in wars is prevented, the industrial base it has built
remains. What remains is the normalization of a militarized, war-ready
society.
We know this from the automotive industry: because profits are made
there and many jobs depend on it, the ecologically and socially
necessary transformation of the transportation sector is being
obstructed. How can we expect things to be any different with a powerful
military-industrial complex when it comes to peace and disarmament?
The societal acceptance of a military presence in public spaces, war
rhetoric in politics, or compulsory military service for young people
could not simply be reversed. The Bundeswehr (German Federal Armed
Forces) was once considered a "school of the nation," where hierarchical
thinking, obedience, and the cover-up of abusive behavior towards the
weak, disguised as camaraderie, are practiced. The current course is
leading us, if not into war, then at least into a militarized and thus
warmongering society.
The reintroduction of conscription is the next logical step and fits
seamlessly into the militarization of recent years. The fact that we can
still invoke Article 4, Paragraph 3 of the Basic Law may be reassuring
for some. This states: "No one may be compelled against their conscience
to perform military service with weapons."
At first glance, this may seem like a simple and safe way to
conscientious objection. However, we must understand that the phrase
"against one's conscience" is deliberately vague and can be interpreted
and shifted arbitrarily by the relevant authorities. Who ultimately
decides which conscientious objection constitutes sufficient
justification? This decision would be made by the military, who, within
the framework of a "conscience test," determine whether a particular
reason is sufficient and credible. We are all familiar with the
arbitrariness in the grading of tests from school.
Let's look back and ask our parents or grandparents about their
experiences: Conscientious objection hearings in the past were
characterized by trick questions and deliberate tactics. Many have heard
the story of pacifists, for example, being asked during their hearing
what they would do if "someone attacked their partner at night and there
happened to be a weapon at their feet." An ill-considered answer to this
question could render their conscientious objection insufficient. But
even if these or similar questions were answered "correctly" in the eyes
of the court, participation in war was not ruled out. The wording of the
article in the Basic Law (GG) states "military service with weapons." It
is therefore quite intentional to force us, despite recognized
conscientious objection, into military service as medics, logisticians,
or administrators, in order to maintain the nation's ability to wage war.
Here, the authoritarian character of the state becomes clearly evident.
Under the guise of defending "Western values" and "freedom," the freedom
of its own citizens is massively restricted. As briefly mentioned above,
in military operations, the state is concerned with its own interests
and not with the interests of its citizens. When students and workers
face students and workers from other nation-states on the front lines,
they kill each other in defense of their national raison d'état. They
fight against their own interests, against the interests of their class,
to protect the national economy and to secure national power and
territorial claims.
Therefore:
No questionnaires and no conscriptions that prepare for forced military
service! Take away the military's space, stop the militarization of society!
! ... No youth officers in schools!
No weapons displays at city festivals!
No arms production in Osnabrück or anywhere else!
No to military service in any form!
https://likos.noblogs.org/2026/03/06/kein-kriegsdienst-fuer-das-kapital-redebeitrag-zum-schulstreik-am-05-03-2026/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) Germany, Dia Platform: Out to the Feminist International Day of Struggle! -- 99 femicides in 2025! (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(en) Germany, Dia Platform: US Imperialist Aggression Against Cuba - Solidarity with the Cuban People! (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center