A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) France, OCL: Read First tremors of the Earth Uprisings (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Fri, 2 Aug 2024 09:17:43 +0300


We reproduce here a presentation of Premières shakes des Uprisings of the earth, published in La Grand Goule (GG), anarchist communist newspaper from Poitou, which invites readers to discuss the proposals and analyzes proposed in this book. ---- A welcome invitation because, as the GG says, it is rare that in revolutionary circles questions of strategy are addressed concretely. Since this book appeared, The Uprisings seems to be leaning towards a line in which anti-fascism would justify new alliances. With anti-fascist fractions of the bourgeoisie? Between fractions of the proletariat? Both at the same time, which would explain the "crucial" importance they attach to these elections? We will see. The fronts tell us nothing of value when they are materialized by "alliances" between parties who will only stop, once in power, from swallowing up the only front that is valuable in our eyes, that of the exploited on the ground. struggles against the bourgeoisie. The only front that would allow fascism or post-fascism to be thrown into the dustbin of history.

It is not easy to provide a collective review of a book that has only just been released and which addresses issues that affect us very closely. Especially since it is rare for revolutionary movements to address questions of strategy linked to analyzes of the period we are going through, other than through timeless ideological rehashings which have shown their limits.

While waiting for more collective points of view resulting from future discussions (it is already a first merit of the book to generate them), La Grand Goule will be happy to publish the points of view that readers would like to share with us. achieve.

From my point of view, the book is both thought-provoking and disturbing.

Stimulating because if Les Uprisings define themselves as "concentrated on the defense of land and water", they do not make their struggle the central element of social criticism, as many struggle activists tend to do. called specific. The Uprisings are positioning themselves as one of the elements shaking France in recent times, from the Yellow Vests to the movement against pension reform, from the riots following the murder of Nahel to the recent peasant movement with all its ambiguities.

Stimulating because they advocate reconnecting with direct action which is in some way "written in the DNA" of anarchists in the sense of acting for and by oneself without mediation or supreme guide.

Stimulating because for them, they proclaim from the start, it is about "bringing ecology back down to earth", that is to say "giving up on saving the planet" (an idealistic way to say the least of humanize the earth). It will survive us and does not need us, affirm the Uprisings. It is better to anchor ourselves in land and territorial struggles rather than fishing for national or international institutions to change course and make good decisions.

Disturbing

Seeking and promoting horizontality is an approach that has been gaining momentum for more than 25 years throughout society and particularly in the world of social conflicts. A very understandable result in a country which has made verticality a model both for the "republican" State and for the "socialist" movement: centralism and bureaucracy did not fail to arouse rejections following the collapse of "socialism real" and the observation that parliamentary democracy and liberalism only generate a succession of wars, each more deadly than the last.

The Uprisings, like the libertarian movement as a whole historically, are part of this search for horizontality. However, they think that we should not throw the baby out with the bathwater: horizontality must, of course, be cultivated but it has its weaknesses in terms of decision-making capacity and overall political understanding. For example, the movement that is currently taking shape is diverse and we must therefore accept its heterogeneity, this is what is and will be its strength. But we must still be able to decide when necessary at certain times to mark the border with the enemy. Hence the need to accept a minimum of verticality.

Of course Les Soulèves considers that this presents some dangers which should not be ignored but that it is by articulating the two in an "intelligent" way that we will move forward. How? This is where the clues are missing except for a few references to "felt" more of a psycho-sociological and group dynamic type than direct political control.

The book presents itself as collective, written and discussed by several dozen people, which immediately leads to the question: but who are The Uprisings? 200 people departing from the ZAD of NDDL in January 2021 tells us First tremors. Or now the hundreds (thousands) who recognize themselves and work in the 150 newly created committees? Or just the few dozen who met on a farm, out of sight, to develop a response to the attempted dissolution requested by Darmanin?

There is a vagueness here which can remain productive to the extent that it is not desirable to strictly delimit a dynamic (in any case it is impossible), but it must be circumscribed and constantly observed with a critical eye. to prevent decisions that concern the whole being taken only by a small group deemed more suitable. Since there is a need to "train the new arrivals" the Uprisings tell us, what will be the content of this teaching?

The authors of the book are well aware of the possible shift towards traditional forms of domination that certain acceptances can lead to and they seek to find solutions to avoid them, which certainly concerns us all. Indeed, getting around these obstacles does not depend on good political leadership which would have found a remedy and miracle techniques but on the collective capacity of a movement, in, alongside and outside the Uprisings, to nourish this horizontality and to remain autonomous while taking into account the political necessity of articulating the local with the global fight against a system that we want to destroy.

Martin

http://oclibertaire.lautre.net/spip.php?article4221
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center