A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Castellano_
Català_
Deutsch_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
All_other_languages
{Info on A-Infos}
(en) Electraz #2 - An Insight on Violence - by Maintenant ou Jamais
From
Worker <a-infos-en@ainfos.ca>(http://passionbomb.com/alcatraz/ **)
Date
Sat, 19 Oct 2002 05:52:02 -0400 (EDT)
________________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
http://www.ainfos.ca/
http://ainfos.ca/index24.html
________________________________________________
On March 28th in Oakland, RACE (Revolutionary
Anti-Authoritarians of Color) held a panel discussion on
"the role of violence in revolutionary social change." The
panel featured Lorenzo Komboa Ervin, an ex-Black
Panther, former political prisoner, and author of
Anarchism and the Black Revolution; and Mike E., a
German-born martial arts expert and activist.
The third panelist was Aragorn, a local anti-racist who
had fought Neo-Nazis at a tragic cost to himself. After
skinhead thugs invaded his local punk scene and began
terrorizing queers and people of color, a group of punks
organized in an attempt to stop them. The group soon
met with disaster: a small contingent was accosted one
night by a large group of racist skins. One anti-racist
was killed; Aragorn was stabbed and beaten.
Mike E., who was raised in Iran and America, has also
been involved with battles of self-defense.but as an
instructor as well as a combatant. He has trained women
and Anti-Racist Action members in the art of
self-defense, and has helped organize for social change
in Berlin, Chiapas, and the U.S.
At the beginning of the discussion, the panelists made
clear their belief that the forum.s purpose was not to
debate violence versus non-violence as a moral issue,
since many anarchists already agree that violence in
struggle against the state can be justifiable.
Mike E. began to delve further into theories on violence
when he emphasized that "one should be aware of the
difference between between acts of vigilantism and
those of self-defense." The difference lies in motive and
outcome: vigilante action is typically motivated by a
desire for revenge, rather than justice, and is conducted
without regard to the ultimate effect of such an act on
the larger community surrounding the combatants.
Mike also mentioned the difference between offensive
and defensive violent acts. The line between the two is
sometimes blurry. Take, for example, someone about to
commit murder. Interventionists motivated by a desire
for justice could, by committing an act of violence that
disables the potential murderer, save the victim and
demonstrate to the perpetrator that such behavior will
not be tolerated. This could be considered a defensive
act.
Similarly, Mike believes that knowledge of self-defense
should be widely taught, particularly to vulnerable
women and children. 911 is not a solution, he says,
because police tend to aggravate situations of
violence.and frequently commit them themselves. The
Stolen Lives Project, a book project by the October 22nd
Coalition, listed over 2000 documents victims of police
brutality in America, a testament to the deadly force of
the police department.
It was made clear that "if people chose to deal with
[systemic brutality], support form the whole group being
victimized is important because if an individual acts by
themselves, they might be placing others unwillingly in
a dangerous situation. Also, resources and connections,
such as legal advice, through the community are good to
have in case [violence] occurs."
Lorenzo Komboa Ervin, the panel.s third member, is a
former Black Panther who is perhaps most famous for
hijacking a plane to escape criminal charges for his
political activity in the late 1960s. In jail after being
captured and sentenced to two life sentences, he
organized prisoners. unions and wrote Anarchism and
the Black Revolution, a well-known book of anarchist
theory.
Ervin is "opposed to individual missions or small
militias," and believes in " an armed uprising by the
masses." He elaborated that it is wise to have the full
support of the masses because small groups can be
more easily prosecuted, or put in jail without even being
heard of.
After the panel finished their presentations, questions of
rank, hierarchy, leadership, and what methods militant
anarchists use came up.
A temporary leadership can sometimes be beneficial, in
the sense that an individual who has more knowledge of
tactics can be a helpful teacher. There are those who
have learned skills and how to teach them, and others
should learn from them, possibly with the objective to be
able to teach others. A teacher should be seen as an
equal on a personal level, but granted respect for their
knowledge. Self-discipline, commitment, and good
conditioning are important to achieving a solid
foundation of self-defense skills. It.s often good to learn
traditional methods as well as experimenting with
various styles, to gain a deeper understanding of your
skills.
Hierarchical representatives shouldn.t be mistaken for
people chosen as teachers or temporary leaders, because
those on top of a hierarchy can create dogma, constrain
individual thought, and are more vulnerable to attack by
the police or government.
Each individual must be held responsible for their
actions. Members of activist movements must represent
an aggregation of individuals connected by no particular
bonds. The .whole. armed movement must take care of
the general interest of harnessing the aggression within
to impede and subvert the enemy and reclaim freedom
and peace.
Organization is needed, and the panel generally agreed
that diverse organizations could each have their own
tactics because each is subject to different
circumstances. It is good to keep in consideration the
experiences and undistorted history of other groups, but
evaluating present circumstances and applying methods
appropriate to time and place is preferable to imitate past
movements or other organizations. Also, armed conflict
should not be seen as an ideal for any or every conflict,
but merely an option to be considered. Sometimes,
peaceful methods are more effective or better used.
Providing different methods for different problems is
most effective. As Mike put it, "The tactic has to match
the task at hand."
While the panelists felt that violence wasn.t necessarily
correct for every time and place, they also voiced
opposition to dogmatic pacifism. Lorenzo explained that
"dogmatic nonviolent beliefs usually stem from people
who are comfortable with the state," adding that
"pacifists cultivate myths about nonviolence as a form of
escapism."
Aragorn felt that "the movement may not be able to
cause the state to collapse, but when the time comes,
[the state] will show its seams. And when that moment
arrives, then would be the most effective time to strike."
The panelists contributed other thoughts as well, both
on violence for political means and self-defense.
Self-defense is a psychological struggle, not just a
physical one; deceptiveness and unpredictability can be
great weapons. Be alert. effective self-defense relies on
both on not being paranoid and never under-estimating
your enemy. Attempt, at all times, to neutralize violent
situations.
When planning for offensive violence, don.t make your
mission too widely known. The objective is to not get
caught. Getting killed or imprisoned will be completely
ineffective for political struggle. Timing is essential for
ultimate effectiveness; the infinite oscillations of the
natural and political
order are nonlinear and have an unpredictable balance.
We cannot be too eager to move toward insurrection
without every aspect needed in place to acheive our goal.
Without hesitation, we can offer education, train
ourselves and prepare for social change. Only then will
circumstance permit the thorough destruction of the
capitalist genocidal state, either sporadically or
universally.
We need to find the will to create change on a
continuous basis, since the key to a healthy evolution is
perpetual revolution, theoretically or in practice.
*******
********
****** The A-Infos News Service ******
News about and of interest to anarchists
******
COMMANDS: lists@ainfos.ca
REPLIES: a-infos-d@ainfos.ca
HELP: a-infos-org@ainfos.ca
WWW: http://www.ainfos.ca/
INFO: http://www.ainfos.ca/org
-To receive a-infos in one language only mail lists@ainfos.ca the message:
unsubscribe a-infos
subscribe a-infos-X
where X = en, ca, de, fr, etc. (i.e. the language code)
A-Infos Information Center