|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2021 |
of 2020
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) anarkismo.net - awsm.nz: Movie Review: 'Alone in Berlin' (2016) by LAMA (AWSM), Review of a movie about resistance in Nazi Germany. (ca, de, it, pt)[machine translation]
Date
Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:10:09 +0200
Nazi Germany continues to be a rich topic for filmmakers. There are many complex
aspects to that regime and its history. This means it can be approached in many
ways from comedy to serious drama. Alone in Berlin (2016) is an example of the
latter. It fits within a subset of movies that address opposition to the Nazis.
In this case, the source material is a 1947 book that covers the non-fiction
activities of Otto and Elise Hampel. They were a working-class couple, here named
Otto (Brendan Gleeson) and Anna Quangel (Emma Thompson). Some changes have been
made in the fictionalising of the story. In the movie, the couple becomes engaged
in their independent resistance work in reaction to news of the death of their
son. He is killed at the very start of the film while serving as a soldier. The
husband works as a foreman in a small industrial workshop. He takes it upon
himself to initiate opposition via the writing of postcards with defiant slogans
upon them, leaving them on the steps of public offices and other places. Soon the
police are on their case. That's the plot.
The acting, cinematography, music and mise-en-scene uniformly work in the movie
in a downbeat way. That is not a criticism. It wisely avoids putting a glossy
patina on what was a horrible regime. It doesn't get the usual Hollywood
treatment and that's a good thing. Gleeson in particular exudes a sorrowful
demeanour that barely allows him a smile. There is a fire underneath but
outwardly his character is just another worker drone in service of the system.
Likewise Thompson is a million miles from any sort of charisma in her portrayal
of an ordinary woman trying to deal with the death of a son at the hands of a
state she can't believe in any more. The camera work is conventional and doesn't
draw attention to itself. Likewise, the neighbourhood where the characters live
is a drab brown. These parts of the film all tend to work in its favour.
Despite the positive parts of the film, there are things that could be said to
work against it. One is the role and acting of Daniel Bruhl. He plays the Gestapo
investigator Eschereich who is assigned the task of tracking down the mysterious
card writer. Eschereich is an old-school, scientific detective who is interested
in methodically figuring out who the culprit is. That might sound weird to
mention, but in the Third Reich the internal politics were such that his
superiors are more interested in framing the first person who comes along to suit
a political need, rather than find the actual wrong-doer'. Bruhl is a capable
actor who is easy to like and the contrast between his character's motivations
and his bosses, puts the viewer in an uneasy position of almost wanting him to
succeed in his mission. That's no fault of Bruhl, he's doing his job, but his
dynamism is worryingly seductive if you aren't careful. You might be kind and say
this merely makes the film more subtle than your average portrayal of Hitler's
Germany. The extent to which you see it that way will depend on your own
impression of course.
Drama should have a sense of tension to it. That can take place within a
character, between a character and others, or conflict between the character and
his/her environment. A story such as Alone in Berlin would seem to be ready-made
for building tension. In fact, though, there are very few such moments. Otto
leaves the card on some steps and walks away. Somebody finds it and reads it.
This is shown in such a perfunctory way that it elicits no jolt of concern for
Otto. There is one point where Otto is almost discovered by a bystander who
intercepts one of his cards. But there are no real heart-stopping moments where
you take the side of the character on an emotional level and feel personal
empathy with his escape. Director Perez would do well to study Hitchcock's oeuvre
to see how you could build the dramatic tension lacking in this film.
So we are provided an interesting antagonist in the shape of Eschereich and
little emotionally derived empathy for the people you should support. Since we
are never introduced to the son, we don't feel emotionally invested in the
character or his fate and by extension his parents. So all you are left with is
the need to remind yourself periodically on an intellectual, rational level that
the Nazis were bad and yes, the dowdy couple are very much worthy of the viewers'
support. That's ok but probably doesn't lend enough depth. Which is a shame.
Alone in Berlin may not be essential viewing, therefore, but any film that
positively acknowledges opposition to Hitler has to be valued.
Related Link: https://awsm.nz/?p=8953
https://awsm.nz/?p=8953
https://www.anarkismo.net/article/32173
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center