A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_ _The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours | of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) UNIVERSITY: ANOMIA, SAFETY AND DEATH ... THE ANTI-SENSITIVE STUDY by dirty horse APO

Date Wed, 31 Oct 2018 10:24:02 +0200


Thoughts on the criminalization of the struggles on the basis of Paraskevopoulos' finding ---- On Wednesday 19 September it was published and handed over to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Education, the findings of the "Committee for the Study of Academic Freedoms and Peace in Universities". It has also been sent to the administrations of the universities who can comment. The three central issues with which the "Paraskevopoulos conclusion" is concerned are: ---- violence within universities, the issue of squatting in campuses and the issue of drugs. ---- In fact, this "new" finding has nothing new as it moves in the same direction that the state has long ago. In fact, it is a variation of the broader effort being made with particular intensity in recent years for the deepening of control and surveillance and universities, for hitting the association and the criminalization of social-class resistance. An attempt to sterilize the universities and discipline the student body, either by suppressing and controlling, or by intensifying our studies. An attempt on the part of the state to put everything that moves outside the institutional frameworks that it forms and defines as acceptable and legitimate in its entirety.

Universities have always been the center of the issue of "lawlessness" and security, with key players in this perception of reactionary forces such as the DAP-NDFK and various prominent academics. Obviously the well-known parrots of the Mass Media they did not miss the opportunity to either muddy every racing mobilization under the pretext of the "lawlessness", or to pave the way for repression, to increase control and surveillance. What is characteristic is that in the broader context of "lawlessness" are the occupied and self-managed spaces within the universities, the occupations that take place at times to create a center of struggle, as well as mobilizations concerning the student clubs and their action. Besides, for decades squats, with the different character that each one can bring, have been at the forefront of repression (from occupations that for years have been a part of conscious and self-organized resistance, being the focal points of struggle and fermentation, to the student occupations that several times with the mass and their combat, have blocked state plans in education). Today, their repression comes back in an imperative, expanded and upgraded way on the state agenda: have blocked state plans in education). Today, their repression comes back in an imperative, expanded and upgraded way on the state agenda: have blocked state plans in education). Today, their repression comes back in an imperative, expanded and upgraded way on the state agenda:


" Academic functions and free dialogue are constantly disrupted", "confrontation of the assertive character of temporary occupations of universities by students or other groups with or without deterioration", "review of the system of guarding the Universities", "in the event of an offense serious crimes (felons, crimes against life), public power intervenes on its own initiative, and the question of the functioning of an asylum committee does not arise ".

It is obvious from the "findings" (typical of the extent of each issue and the over-analysis of the response to the mobilizations) as well as from the "general preventive measures" proposed, that the government's great desire is to hit the resistance and upgrade of the custody regime. In this context, security is proposed in the schools, control of every activity (even the tax evasion parties), while the asylum goes for walks (as it has already been done with the Gavroglu law) as any references to it are in the sense of the academic .

The report proposes the creation of an "Asylum Committee" to construct the institutional framework for police intervention in the event of a misdemeanor, but at any time it judges (in the case of a felony, the police intervenes on its own initiative), but also other committees (which may include representatives of students ) in order to prevent and deal with squatting. The report also states that the government, in co-operation with university administrations, is in a position to allocate space to students or to "groups in which the majority of them are students" but always "to a strict institutional framework".

We observe for another moment the "cheese" of student participation in the committees and thus in the decisions. This move attempts to create a supposed treaty of democracy and student participation in decisions. In essence, it seeks to distract the students' consensus and legitimize decisions directed against the achievements of the struggles that have been given for decades under the pretext of "participation" and "dialogue." In addition, the finding, at the opposite of the self-managed sites, suggests the creation of recreational spaces that will operate under the strict supervision of jewelery. Those places that will be stripped of anything radical and subversive,

Just a few days after the publication of the findings, on the occasion of the occupation of a room in the Philosophy by the anarchist collectivity "Rubikon", rectoral authorities, media and various reactionary forces started a delirium, turning the issue into its "hottest" and "most important" current situation. Initially, a series of announcements were made by the Rector's Office, PEDDEP, as well as statements by the Dean of Philosophy, condemning the occupation and saying that these movements "impede the academic and educational function and therefore there must be direct intervention by the state ". On 17/10 a group of teachers decided to expel Rubikon from the school by "guarding" and "reopening" the room. The movement of teachers, the declarations of civilian personnel and the media misleading following about "lawlessness" in philosophy can only be perceived as signs of an attempt to ban political expression and action within the universities. An attempt to challenge even the possibility of a political group within the universities. After the lock-out of the Philosophy on Thursday, 17/10, the Senate also proceeded to lockout out of the ASOEE on the occasion of the "presence of addicted people inside and outside the premises of ASOEE" by asking "the competent authorities to solve the problem" An attempt to challenge even the possibility of a political group within the universities. After the lock-out of the Philosophy on Thursday, 17/10, the Senate also proceeded to lockout out of the ASOEE on the occasion of the "presence of addicted people inside and outside the premises of ASOEE" by asking "the competent authorities to solve the problem" An attempt to challenge even the possibility of a political group within the universities. After the lock-out of the Philosophy on Thursday, 17/10, the Senate also proceeded to lockout out of the ASOEE on the occasion of the "presence of addicted people inside and outside the premises of ASOEE" by asking "the competent authorities to solve the problem"

The "Paraskevopoulos conclusion" comes shortly after the Gavroglu law (a natural extension of older drafts, such as the framework law). A law that expands legal and repressive arsenals on a number of issues (eg asylum) and on the other hand enhances the attack on universities and not just institutions as part of the educational restructuring that has taken place in recent years. A law that succeeded in the merger - the abolition of TEI departments, tuition fees for postgraduate students, classed "academic" asylum, introduced the economic autonomy of universities paving the way for their further connection with the market and created "biennial courses" or "certificates" of 120 ECTS.

While the rector of the University of Patras celebrates the completion of the famous fence (cost only € 590,000!), While the cameras are placed in many sections, the security patrols are stepped up and the constant control (even with drone! ) to anyone who enters the area, in the Architecture Department there are no teachers to teach (last year there was a suggestion from the chairman of the department to create an annex with tuition fees in Athens for Athenian students), the workers in the halls remain simple eradicators and mobilize, the cleaners are unpaid and under a work galley. At the same time, many students stay out of the halls as the number of places is not enough to meet needs,

By means of a series of methodologies, regulations and bills, the state is gradually withdrawing from any student care provision by passing the cost of attendance on the backs of students and turning student care into rewarding. Last year, we saw the university textbooks being suspended, the outbreaks of INDI- ABIM being closed, and the number of students who have access to housing and food has fallen further. A few days ago, the Board of Directors of the AUTh Club announced the application of a fee to those who are not entitled to a diet card (something that has been achieved in other universities). After the direct reactions of the students, the Board hastened to withdraw by saying that this is only a rumor. Still,

Against this gloomy reality, we must organize our resistance, we must catch the thread of the races again and claim that we belong to it. Faced with the disorientation of the student - and not only - body - from the real problems, let us bring our interests and needs back to the fore. Against the slander of the struggle and of the collective claim against the dispersion of fear and terrorism towards the culture of defeatism and frustration and the logic that nothing changes, to draw inspiration from the struggles of the past and to take life in our own hands . Against the fake dilemma of "academic freedom and peace" and "lawlessness", we must fight for social and class emancipation. Against the efforts of the sovereigns to cut off the struggles from every social-workplace, we can respond with their empowerment and interconnection. Faced with attempting to sterilize universities from every sense of struggle and collectivity, against the criminalization of all forms of resistance, we re-establish the university by turning it into a living race, fermentation and politicization cell. To make universities, workplaces, schools and neighborhoods of resistance, claim, solidarity, disobedience and disobedience in the plans of the rulers. against the criminalization of all forms of resistance, to reorganize the university by transforming it into a living race, fermentation and politicization cell. To make universities, workplaces, schools and neighborhoods of resistance, claim, solidarity, disobedience and disobedience in the plans of the rulers. against the criminalization of all forms of resistance, to reorganize the university by transforming it into a living race, fermentation and politicization cell. To make universities, workplaces, schools and neighborhoods of resistance, claim, solidarity, disobedience and disobedience in the plans of the rulers.

To collectivize in autonomous / libertarian schemes within schools. Organize our intervention so generally in the university area, and especially in the general assemblies of the departments. To set up a libertarian proposal for organization and struggle within the university institutions, which will be able to cope with the fervor and consistency of the challenges posed by the conjuncture, the exaggeration of our needs, and the wider depreciation of our lives. Linking and radicalizing struggles to meet our needs and promoting our interests. To exaggerate the small but very important student class denials that are being developed in the university everyday life. Strengthen collective struggles within the University (General Assemblies, Mobilizations, etc.).

Through organized, collective and unpretentious struggles and far from any logic of leadership and assignment that only disturbs and weakens the struggle to bring to our forefront our interests, needs and desires. With a weapon of class solidarity, let us connect with the struggles of the workers, organize and resist every attack we take. We do not claim anything less than everything, we want them all and for all!

AGAINST THE CONTROL, DISCHARGE AND CONTROL OF RESISTANCE

SOCIAL AND TAX GAMES ARE NOT LEGAL - NOT ILLEGAL. YOU ARE LAW!

AGAINST TAXIC BARRIERS, RUNNING AND TREATMENT

RESPONSE AND COMPETITION IN AND OUT OF SCHOOLS
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center