A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_ _The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours | of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Anarchist black cross Belarus: The third of September is the day of testing

Date Sat, 8 Sep 2018 13:36:49 +0300


Today it is eight years since September 3, 2010, the day of the beginning of the most massive attack of the state on the anarchist movement for the history of independent Belarus. Since then, a lot of water has flowed under the bridge. Behind other repressions and the daily struggle for the survival of our groups, much has been erased from memory and forgotten. Today, a whole generation of anarchists has grown up, who knows about those events that are far from what they are, only from the stories of comrades or does not know at all. ---- The Pramen group has prepared for you an analytical longride dedicated to the "clean-up" of September-October 2010 and the first "contemporary Anarchist cause" in modern Belarus. Make yourself comfortable - read a lot.

As it was or a five-minute nostalgia
In the distant years 2009-2010, the anarchist movement of Belarus was a completely different picture than it is now. The marker of the then level of development can be considered regular participation of the anarchist "black bloc" in many sanctioned opposition marches - mainly in the Chernobyl Way.
In 2009, the black block on the Chernobyl route was, according to various estimates, 120-140 people.

Anarchist unauthorized processions, held on various occasions several times a year, collected 30-40 people - and almost never ended in detentions. In 2010, after the authorities decided to make a pass to the Chernobyl Way only through metal detectors, as well as in protest against the right-wing organizations at rallies, which then began to "poke" the anarchists, angry at their presence (from opposition leaders even the statements sounded, that milia should remove anarchic brochures while inspecting the framework), the anarchists decided to hold their event by collecting an unauthorized rally of about 50 people near the Pushkinskaya metro station.

There were other, equally spectacular actions. For example, the 9-meter banner "No to Fascism", posted on the day of solidarity with Russian anti-fascists and anarchists on January 19, 2010.

For example, from 9 to 16 March 2010, in single days of action against police lawlessness, anarchist actions took place in six cities of Belarus (Minsk, Logoysk, Bobruisk, Polotsk, Gomel, Baranovichi), and in Minsk - in several districts of the city.

From 2006 to 2009 in Minsk for a while there were two squats ("Flat" and "Workshop"), where half-open events were frequent. Regular campaigning with graffiti, leaflets were regularly conducted. Punk concerts were filled with agitational literature. A certain anarchist influence was present among the fans of MTZ-RIPO: and on their sector, some games were attended by up to 500 people. An initiative was created for constant agitation in the working people and students. Anarchists have been actively campaigning against nuclear power plants in Belarus for about two years. And this is not all.

However, almost all the activity of anarchists - including unauthorized processions in the center of the city, as a rule, passed by the media. They simply ignored us. Interest in the anarchist movement among the political forces, civil society and the media was at zero, although at that time our numbers did not exceed, then it was clearly approaching the number of any youth opposition movement like the MF, BUNT or "European Belarus".

It will be fair to note that such an extent of the anarchist movement became possible largely because the liberal opposition was much stronger and more massive - and consequently, the influence of repressive bodies was largely drawn upon it, and anarchists for a long time were not perceived by the state as a threat. This gave us definite head start and time for unpunished growth.

Why burn?
In the conditions of a lively and growing activity of the anarchist movement, continuous numerical growth, any, even the smallest social unrest, as well as the next discriminatory laws of the state, gave hope for a revolutionary explosion and swift changes. Many comrades began to feel that the movement is marking time, and it needs radicalization, that we seem to have stalled to some limit of development, behind which, as many thought then, the revolution is almost looming - it is only worth pressing. Many forms of activism were tried (thousands of leaflets, stickers, unauthorized rallies, graffiti, banners, etc.) - and the desired rebellion never came. To expand the sphere of the permitted and to attack the state with more radical methods, rather than agitation and propaganda, was seen by some quite logical and correct decision.

A tactic of conducting actions of direct action was chosen alongside his comrades. I must say that her views differed, as did her expectations. But the general was the narrative that while doing spectacular, albeit sometimes symbolic, actions of direct action, we will be able to attract the attention of the major media to ourselves - and therefore our ideas and our movement. And then the workers, youth, students, seeing anarchists acting radically, or reading our press releases, where we call for fighting the state with the same methods.

In the understanding of those who did then these actions, it was propaganda by own example.

Smoke without fire and with fire. And the paint
The events in Greece in 2008 had an enormous impact on the transition of a number of associates to such methods. Not for nothing that the first "officially registered" action of direct action, directly committed on behalf of anarchists in Belarus, was an action on December 20, 2008, when around midnight an anarchist group was attacked by the ROVD of the Central District of Minsk. Here is what the portal "Indymedia Belarus" wrote about this:

"The entrance to the building and the surrounding area were thrown by smoke bombs. Smoke covered the entire territory of the ROVD and the adjacent roadway. Here are the words of one of the participants: "Our comrade from Greece was killed cold-bloodedly. He was only 15 years old. It does not matter which policemen did it, they are the same in all countries. Their function is to protect the looted wealth and privileges of those in power. And they will not stop at any cruelty. By our action, we pursued two goals: to show solidarity with the Greek comrades and all victims of the Mentovsky terror, and also to let the rubbish know that for every attempt on anarchists and any social activists, they will receive radical radical responses. This time it was only smoke bombs. Greece, we are with you! "

After the action, the anarchists fled safely. "

After that, from 2009 to 2010, a number of actions of direct action of varying degrees of symbolism took place.

September 19, 2009 - an unauthorized procession near the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus, during which anarchists throw a smoke bomb on the territory of the Ministry of Defense. The action is timed to the Russian-Belarusian military exercises "West-2009"

December 5, 2009 - Anarchists paint the casino "Shangri La", throwing several faeriers and light bulbs in the façade.

The action is presented as a struggle against demonstrative luxury in a country where many workers live in poverty.

March 9, 2010 - Anarchists broke a window in a militia stronghold in Soligorsk. In the window thrown fire.

April 29, 2010 - Anarchists break windows in the house of the Federation of Trade Unions of Belarus, urging workers on the eve of May 1 to fight more radically for their rights and not trust official trade unions.

May 1, 2010 - Anarchists set fire to the entrance to one of the branches of Belarusbank. The action is timed to the May Day.

On the same night, on May 1, anarchists hacked the site of the Novopolotsk City Executive Committee. On the main page was published the text of the brochure "Who Stole Our Happiness?" And a video clip with the address of the Minsk anarchists for 2009.

At the same time in Minsk, at least 3 billboards with state propaganda were burned (some videos are here )

Press releases from shares.

Already after the first action, a criminal case was filed, which garbage reported in the media, saying that they began to search for the perpetrators of hooliganism. However, this did not entail any consequences for the anarcho-movement. As the attack on Shangri-La, for which the administrative officer was originally initiated, did not bring consequences. For the broken window in the cops of Salihorsk, an administrative case was also initiated ("Minor hooliganism"). Running forward, we will say that when the time came, all this was re-qualified for a crime.

Shares near the House of Trade Unions and offices of Belarusbank strained the rubbish much more. Began to appear alarming messages - GUBOPIK began to harass the conversations of MTZ fans (with whom the anarchists were then closely associated), and representatives of punk-hardcore parties, but still - not one anarcho activist. They asked about arsons, they assured us that they had "started criminal cases and will be imprisoned".

Like a bolt from the blue - the first cover of an open event. On May 17, the cops and OMON came to the occupation of the Free-Spot School (https://avtonom.org/freenews/minsk-zaderzhanie-uchastnikov-bespartshkoly), an initiative of the Anti-University forerunners, detaining 17 people. All were taken to the Moscow police department, where they copied the data and photographed, with some held conversations.

The reason for the coverage of the Spotless School is simple - it was announced in the Belarusian "Indymedia" (news portal with a free publication, which was conducted by an anarchist collective). It was on "Indymedia" originally appeared all the anarchist news about arson - and only thence dispersed through other anarchist sites.

On the morning of August 31, 2010, the information space of Belarus literally explodes: the Russian embassy in Minsk is attacked by Molotov cocktails. The embassy Mazda burned down.
At that time, none of us knew that this day would be fateful for the anarchist movement of Belarus.

All analysts, commentators and experts are puzzled: who? The Internet is full of conspiracy theories. Russian politicians begin to speak out: the Belarusians did this to blame Russia. Lukashenka said that the Russians could do this to blame the Belarusians. A full-scale diplomatic scandal is beginning. All that is happening: both the conspiracy frenzy and the helplessness of the Belarusian "experts" are well reflected in the film "Anarchy is a direct action. Non-Engaged Version. "

It should be noted that it was hard to choose a more painful moment for the attack. First, presidential elections are on the nose, and the authorities are more nervous than ever. Secondly, for several months, Russian TV has been showing films "The Godfather", where Lukashenka denounces them in every possible way. These films are watched and discussed by a huge number of Belarusians.

Two days of mutual accusations, the construction of unimaginable theories and sofa analysts are taking place - and on September 2, Indymedia reports that responsibility for this action is assumed by the Friends of Freedom group, and the attack is an act of solidarity with Khimki hostages - two Russian anti-fascists, Gaskarov and Solopov, who were placed in custody for organizing the defeat of the Khimki administration.

After some time, the statement from the site is removed by the moderators, citing the fact that the group "Friends of Freedom" no one knows. Subsequently, this was regarded by many participants of the movement as a betrayal. As it turned out later, the Indymedia staff seriously decided that the action and the press release were a cops provocation aimed at clearing out the protest movement on the eve of the elections. Although outwardly such an act looked, in the context of the radical nature of the action and the huge publicity in the media, more like a fear for oneself.

Subsequently, at least two articles appeared on Indymedia, from the anarchists themselves, where the "arsonists" were condemned or ridiculed. One of the collectives who published the article, when the situation cleared up, publicly took it back.

On the website of the defenders of the Khimki Forest, in turn, a statement appeared on the inadmissibility of such actions of solidarity. In a personal communication group support Gaskarova and Solopova condemned the "Friends of Freedom", saying that the detainees from such support actions "only worse."

Catching anarchists with a wide network
The next day, around 7 am, at once, six special forces broke into the 6 apartments in the city of Minsk, where the anarchists lived (and even in the apartments of several right-wing activists) with combat weapons and made searches. One of them is in an apartment that the cops considered the "headquarters" of the anarchist movement (because there were six activists living there). There the search lasted 7 hours. Six system blocks, thousands of brochures and leaflets were seized. At the same time, two future defendants were detained: Nikolay Dedok and Alexander Frantskevich. On that day, September 3, 2010, 9 anarchists left for Akrestsin Street as suspects.

A few days later, on September 6, there were several more searches and detentions. The third stage occurred in October. In the amount of the case, at least 100 people were detained and / or questioned as witnesses. 17 was sent to the IVS as suspects.

On October 6, "Friends of Freedom" held an action of solidarity with the detainees, showering Molotov cocktails with a door to the IVS in Akrestsin Street. From their statement it followed that on charges of attacking the Russian embassy innocent people were detained, and radical actions would continue. The report about it was posted on "Indymedia", however, it was also removed by the moderators - the anarchists had to distribute it independently through opposition media.

Initial detention of garbage was conducted, most likely, having either operative information about the location of anarchist apartments, or by calculating by IP-addresses active in LJ Anarchists (at that time LiveJournal was the main platform for communication of anarchists and expressing their opinions). Almost all subsequent detentions took place thanks to the garbling scheme of the callers. While inspecting the activist's phone, they watched with whom he had the most chickens and detained this person. He, in turn, also seized the phone and checked the contacts. And so on the chain, until somehow all the active anarchists of Minsk and other cities were detained.

Initially, everyone was detained on suspicion of attacking the Russian embassy. However, after 6-9 days, everyone was released, except for Dedk and Frantskevich.

On September 19, Maxim Vetkin was detained, who would later cooperate with the investigation.

September was the key month for getting garbage depositions. Having received a large number of potential witnesses, the operative GUBOPiKa and the KGB began to actively promote them to the testimony - and not only through the embassy. Anarchists remembered everything done in 2009 and 2010.

The testimony of Alexander Frantskevich

Having made a confession, Denis Bystrik left the country

How garbage worked
Naturally, the cops do not waste their bread for nothing, and they were allowed to understand many anarchists by the old kind psychological pressure on those points that are painful for most of us.
The key threats during the conversations (which, of course, were conducted without a protocol and a lawyer) were:
- Deduction from the university
- Creating problems for the parents at work
- To put on a long term with all the accompanying prison sufferings (of course, the guys were first threatened by sexual violence from inmates)

Of course, screams, insults, mate, rudeness were also widely practiced. The then head of the Third Directorate of GUBOPiK, Alexander Litvinsky, several times beat detainees.

Under these threats many people agreed to testify against their comrades. One of the first to set foot on the path of betrayal was Zakhar Konofalsky and Younes Akdif.

One of the witnesses, Alexei Zhingerovsky, also testified, but refused them at the investigation stage.

Of the accused, testimony was given by Maxim Vetkin and Alexander Frantskevich. At the same time, Yevgeniy Silivonchik (Canada) was detained from Soligorsk. He was charged with an episode with a pedestal in Salihorsk. He almost immediately agreed to cooperate with the investigation and surrendered everything and everything that he knew.

In general, the tactics of the cops were simple: either you give testimony to everyone we demand, and you go as a witness, or you sit yourself. The rubbish already had an approximate list of people whom they considered leaders (although they were asked, of course, to testify at all and "ease their fate"), and it was the testimony against them that interested in debris.
So, while they had accumulated enough evidence against Nikolai Dedk, he had to be rebooted seven times without letting him out of the IVS, and when the anarchist episodes were over, he was restrained on charges of robbery. On the same day, the investigation was provided with a scan of the passport, indicating that Dedok was on that day in Lithuania. Under the law, he was to be released immediately, but, of course, this was not done.

Zakhar Konofalsky gave testimony not only about the shares, but also told the garbage about the internal dynamics and structure of the anarchist movement.

Thanks to the testimony of the traitors, primarily Konofalsky and Vetkin (who almost immediately agreed to cooperate with the police), garbage came to the conclusion that the Russian embassy was set on fire by Igor Olinevich. He was put on the wanted list. Through their operational channels, they learned that he was hiding in Moscow. Denis Bystrik (Igor's friend, who lived with him and who also gave incriminating testimony) was offered to go to Moscow and meet with Igor there. He managed to avoid such a "task" and fled abroad.

But Anton Laptenok agreed to it. We do not know what garbage was promised to him and what was threatened, but this is certainly one of the most vile acts of betrayal in this whole affair. Anton ("Pinocchio") went to Moscow, where he offered to meet Olinevich. The latter went to her, and on November 28, 2010, he was captured by the FSB officers and transferred to the Belarusian garbage on the Brest-Moscow road at night.

Lapteonok soon left the country and now lives in the US and works there as an IT person. It is noteworthy that for a long time some Moscow anti-fascists refused to believe that Laptenok helped the FSB detain Olinevich, and those who accused Laptenka were called provocateurs.

Igor Olinevich was brought to the KGB jail, bypassing all extradition rules, was kept in handcuffs for almost a day, the first interrogation lasted many hours and was accompanied by all possible methods of psychological pressure. Here is how he describes it in his book "I'm going to Magadan" .

"... The border with Belarus. Head vtaplyvayut in the floor, then the operation - illegal. Transfer to local in a bead.
The Moscow people say:
"Do not throw any more garbage."
"Of course, it's our duty, men," they say.
Get moving. They start with threats:
- Did you understand what to say? Or shall we go to one place for explanations?
- Yes, I understand, understood, - I answer, - what's there ...
Yeah, how. Do not dig into memory, do not regret, take seconds, calm your nerves. We need to mobilize, focus on one truth: "Do not believe, do not be afraid, do not ask ..."
- Already at 20.30, call.
The gate collided and the car stopped. In front of his eyes still a hat. I'm completely disoriented. They are led into the study, put on a chair, face to the table, the edge of someone's hand falls on the neck. Ahead of the longest night in my life ...
- Igor, let's talk with you as a man with a man, - a voice came from the opposite.
"People do not talk in this situation," I was surprised at my own voice. Apparently, they did not expect resistance and for a while hesitated. This gave me confidence. Then they started:
"We all know, talk, confess!"
- I do not know, I was not.
"You've already been turned over, why should you refuse?"
Torturing only one question: Dima left or still took later? But how do you know?
- And what about Dima? Giving a testimony?
- What is Dima? You mean Dubovsky?

Clear! They did not! So everything is not so bad.

- What news on the Internet? Have not you kidnapped anyone? Bad work. About your "Cossack" was known in advance. We have prepared. The door opened, someone said:
- Indeed, already hangs on the site.
There was an awkward pause. It seems that they were offended to admit that both were in their hands. All, but there were three or four of them, left. From the heart like a stone fell: Dimon in the wild, did not lose his head, and Buratino was uncovered. Now we have to go through the inquiry. Having once been in a seminar with Markelov's participation (he rest in peace), I learned firmly: no confessions! It is on the testimony given in the early days, as a rule, cases are built.

The investigators returned.

"You're naive." Do you think you have friends? You were all betrayed, and you suspected the wrong thing! But I no longer listened to this nonsense. The first rule is "Do not believe!". All they say is a lie, half-truth. And if true, then for further manipulation. The technique was simple: they started with one episode, but, as soon as they received a rebuff, they switched to another. General Staff ... Casino ... Billboards ... Trade Unions ... Bank ... Embassy ... IVS ... Bank ... Casino ... And so on ad infinitum.
They took it by storm. I fell asleep and woke up many times - as soon as I felt tired, immediately increased the pressure. In the course everything went on: threats, flattery, blackmail, admonished in the senselessness of the struggle, questioned the loyalty of comrades, the emphasis on selfishness, and so on. I did not know how much time had passed. It ceased to exist. It was unclear where the reality, and where the dream ...

"Let's throw it in the hut to skinheads! We have a special skinhunt! ... You are handsome, they like such in prisons ... You have not been beaten yet ... Why do you need this? I would have lived like everyone else. Still have the opportunity! ... Do you do karate? It's hierarchical, you contradict your principles! ... You're afraid to take it, you're a coward! ... You'll sit down. The question is settled. Only here for five or ten years - it's up to you ...
I would give you 12, no, even 20 years ... ("And I would shoot you without options, bitch", it seemed to me). I'm calling your grandmother. Let him know everything about you ... Nobody will hire a lawyer for you ... We need to know only one thing: who paid you? ... "

I only turned on to say, "I do not know, I was not," and again went into unconsciousness. The second rule says: "Do not be afraid." As a rule, they bluff. But even if not, it's the only way to know if you can stand it or not. Who was scared - already defeated. It's worth showing fear - and you're on the hook, you'll get everything out of you.

For a while they took off their cap. There was only one sitting at the table:

"Ah, you're a good guy." Engineer, you lead a healthy lifestyle, do sports. You can not go on like this. I also understand that you are saying a lot of things correctly, that's just realization ... Or maybe, well, its all this? During the whole interrogation, a
sense of recognition periodically arose that this is it and I read it somewhere. This thought was very sobering, it was confirmed that all this was a dramatization. After all, there was still a sense of some isolation, subconsciously I wanted to believe in their arguments and thereby stop everything. Psychological defensive reaction. From it you can not escape.
Again, put on the cap on the eyes. A new one came. He did not begin to fully unharness, but with all the suggestion, selective phrases and a specific tone began to rub what kind of type I "leaped" .... Waiting again. I was thirsty and I wanted to shoot a cigarette. But I knew that this can not be done. Any request should be placed in the format of the requirement. The third rule is "do not ask." Any request makes the psychological climate softer, and maybe this drop will be enough to outweigh the chalice in their favor. "

Solidarity
Meanwhile, a support campaign was unfolding in the wild. Remaining at large, the participants in the movement were extremely difficult: they had to build a network of solidarity from scratch. There were no finances, connections with lawyers, with the parents of detainees, with human rights defenders. The latter agreed to help from the first days, which helped at first save the situation.
In the first months, until the stable group of the AFC was formed, the group of AChK-Moscow rendered substantial assistance to the Minsk comrades.
It should be noted that solidarity and support, even in the anarcho circles themselves, was not unconcerned. Some people, considered old activists, refused to provide assistance, many simply were afraid of repression and fell off.

Due to the fact that many gave, to varying degrees, testimony, the movement was strongly demoralized. Confidence among the comrades was seriously undermined - it was not clear who can be trusted, and who does not. General suspicion, distrust, fear of repression gave rise to a very unpleasant atmosphere and actually paralyzed the movement for more than a year, breaking it into very small groups on the basis of trust.

All this, of course, was exactly what the garbage was striving for. As part of this strategy, for example, they even posted on Indymedia texts about how to disown arrested comrades, condemn violent actions, because "they pose a blow to the whole movement."

Massive attack on all anarchists after a radical action by a small group, provoked a debate that, in fact, should have happened much earlier. On the acceptability / effectiveness of radical actions, on solidarity and support strategies for different teams, and, of course, on the place in the movement of those who agreed to cooperate with the garbage.

A broad support campaign has been launched throughout the CIS and Europe. Graffiti, leaflets, pickets, rallies, processions, smoke bombs, light bulbs with paint and Molotov cocktails of the Belarusian anarchists were supported by Moscow, Peter, Omsk, Novorossiysk, Irkutsk, Vladivostok, Ekaterinburg, Ufa, Kazan, Cheboksary, Nizhny Novgorod, Volgograd, Voronezh, Belgorod , Ryazan, Smolensk, Simferopol, Mariupol, Donetsk, Kiev, Lviv, Chisinau, Minsk, Bobruisk, Baranovichi, Gomel, Zhlobin, Grodno, Bereza, Vilnius, Riga, Lublin, Warsaw, Szczecin, Budapest, Prague, Sofia, Vienna, Tyrol , Berlin, Rostock, Hamburg, Marseille.

A total of 74 solidarity actions took place 8 months before the trial.
Anarchists also paid attention to state television. BT released a horror story in its spirit: "Anarchy is a direct action", where it showed anarchists terrorists and warmongers of churches.

In response, our comrades released the film "Anarchy direct action - unbiased version", where they told how things really happened (see the link above).

On October 16, 2010, in Bobruisk, a group of young people (as it turned out later, 2 anarchists and 1 nationalist) threw Molotov cocktails into the building of the local KGB in solidarity with those arrested on the "anarchists' case" in Minsk. All of them were detained after 3 months. Despite the fact that the damage to the KGB building was miserly, all three were charged under part 2 of Art. 208 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus and received 7 years in prison.

On May 15, 2011, 3 days prior to the trial of our comrades, to the House of Justice on ul. Semashko in Minsk was thrown Molotov cocktail. The building suffered minor damage. Nobody took responsibility for what happened. And despite the fact that the police detained several opposition activists and held several shmons from the members of the anarchist movement, the perpetrators were never found.

Judgment and disgrace of traitors
On May 18, 2011 the court began. The trial in the Zavodskoy Court of Minsk was conducted by Judge Zhanna Khvoynitskaya. Before the court appeared five: Olinevich, Dedok, Frantskevich, Vetkin, Silovychnik. In total, they were charged with 7 episodes (attacks on the General Staff, Trade Union House, Shangri La, Belarusbank, IVS in Akrestsin, Russian embassy, breaking the Novopolotsk City Executive Committee site). Articles: 218 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus, 339 part 2 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus, art. 351.2 and 354.1.

Silvonchik and Vetkin confirmed their confessions at the trial. Both in speeches and in the last word, they fully supported the prosecution's version, saying that they demanded garbage from them, asked the court for indulgence and repented of their deed. All this looked very sorry. It became obvious to all that traitors were able to buy their freedom (if this can be called freedom) only at the price of direct infusion of their friends and associates with garbage. All of them in a moment lost their main circle of communication (anarcho-activists) and for many years lived in fear of punishment, jumping off on the street from yesterday's friends.

From the very beginning, no one doubted that the court would issue a guilty verdict. Nevertheless, all came to the legal side of the defense responsibly. In fact, there was no direct and conclusive evidence of guilt: there were no fingerprints, no filming of CCTV cameras that could identify the accused. The only evidence of this kind is DNA samples that "could most likely have belonged" to Olinevich on one of the items left near the IVS in Akrestsin Street after the arson attack. In other respects, the entire matter was based on the testimony of traitors: Konofalsky, Akdif, Vetkin, Bystrik. All of them, being (by their own words) participants in the shares, were witnesses. For example, it became clear at the trial that Konofalsky was throwing the paving slab into the glass of the Trade Union House, and Dedok, he said, was filming it on camera.

The court not only attracted the enormous attention of the press, but also generated a lot of jokes. Starting with CDs with video materials, literally stitched to the punch hole (after which it was impossible to read them), ending with the widely-cited dialogue of Olinevich and the prosecutor:

(Prosecutor, indignantly): Do you even recognize the laws?!
(Olinevich, flematically): Of course, I recognize the laws of ... chemistry, physics.

The court was also remembered for its unprecedented security measures. The building was surrounded by riot police, and before the beginning of the process, they were combed by dog handlers and dogs. To get into the hall it was possible only through the frames with metal detectors and registration of the passport at the entrance. The accused were transported by a special convoy with flashing lights, guarded by a detachment of twelve garbage. However, all this did not prevent lively and sincere support: at all five meetings, those wishing to attend the meeting lacked space - people were standing on the street.

The verdict did not shock anyone. Olinevich - 8 years of the strengthened regime, Dedok - 4,5 years of the general regime, Frantzkevich - 3 years of the strengthened regime.

On the episode with IVS, Olinevich was acquitted. Dadk removed article 218 part 1, leaving only "hooliganism" through Art. 18 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus is the "organizer of the crime". None of the perpetrators of the burning of bigboards could be identified by the investigation and the court.

Vetkin and Silivonchik received "chemistry" and were released for their betrayal in the courtroom.

At the end of the process, the AFC-Belarus released a heartfelt text about solidarity and intermediate conclusions drawn by the anarch movement.

All the accused soon went to the zones. Their relatives, the Belarusian Chancellery and the democratic public of Belarus continued their struggle for their recognition as political prisoners, and in November 2011 all three were recognized as such. Every year, pressure on political prisoners-anarchists intensified: deprivation of visits and transfers, SHIZO, PKT became revenge of the regime for recognition as "political" and unwillingness to write a petition for pardon. Nikolay Dedok, three days before the end of the term, was sentenced to another year of imprisonment under art. 411. But this, as they say, is a completely different story.

conclusions
The interpretation of the incident took an anarchist movement for several years, and some issues are still debatable. But there are conclusions that can not be questioned:

1. Absolute majority of anarchists were not ready for repression of this level. Many thought that the regime can only give a day, and for anarchists, no one will take, because there is a goal more important - the opposition. People did not fully understand what they are doing and how dangerous it is. Hence - the psychological breakdown on the first interrogations.
The majority had no experience with trash. Even after the trash was covered in "May 2010," Spotlight School "in search of arsonists, there was a completely carefree atmosphere in the movement, as if nothing had happened.
People did not give enough time to prepare for repression, to learn how to behave during interrogations, information security. Those who insisted on learning this were often looked upon as alarmists or paranoid. As a result: most people to a greater or lesser extent gave the garbage the necessary information, supplying them with new information about the movement, its structure and principles of work.
As for the a priori principle "Do not surrender your own," it turned out that it is much easier to adhere to it in words than in deeds. Pompous words about brotherhood, solidarity, ASAV and others for many quickly lost power when the prospect of sitting down for 4-5 years began to loom. The overwhelming majority of the participants in the movement were, even in theory, not ready to sacrifice freedom for their ideas.

2. The repressions of 2010-2011 were the first repressions against anarchists of this magnitude after the collapse of the USSR. To combat them, a full-fledged anti-repressive network was needed, which was not available at that time. However, through the efforts of the Minsk AFC, solidarity comrades from Russia, Ukraine and European countries, with the help of human rights activists sympathetic to the anarchists of journalists and public / political figures, the anarchists were able to minimize the consequences of this attack and to structure further strategies for their defense. Direct achievements include:

a) Recognition of anarchists by political prisoners (which, incidentally, led to an unprecedented situation when the liberation of anarchists from Lukashenka was demanded by foreign politicians at the level of foreign ministers of European countries or US congressional senators).

b) Legal Aid Organizations

c) The organization of sufficient financial support to the political prisoners themselves in the zones and their relatives

d) Extensive publicity of the case through the media both in Belarus and abroad.

3. The "Anarchist Affair" seriously affected both the Belarusian society and the anarchist movement.

If we talk about the Belarusian society, then:
- The recognition of the anarchist movement has increased by several orders of magnitude. Olinevich's book "I'm going to Magadan" was read by thousands of people who are not anarchists, all people who were politically interested in Belarus knew about the existence of our movement, many of them gained a certain authority, and most importantly, anarchists ceased to be unknown marginals, grata, becoming a full-fledged part of the political scene. If previously non-state media often ignored the actions of anarchists, their voices and opinions, now this is almost not happening. Thanks to reprisals and the court, a video from the actions of anarchists, for which they were judged, was watched by thousands of people.

- New repressive laws were adopted. This is equating the arson of diplomatic representations to terrorist acts (2012), the administrative responsibility for the distribution of recipes for the preparation of explosives (2013), the criminal responsibility for participation in the extremist community and the manufacture / transportation of the Molotov Cocktail (2015). In some cases (as in the case of the law of 2013) it was announced directly that the law was adopted due to the fact that "anarchists were preparing terrorist acts".

For the anarchist movement, the consequences were even more radical:

- The anarchist movement became more clandestine and largely unpopular. Instead of being, as before, a large unified group, it was organized according to the principle of initiatives grouped not by ideological preferences, but by the nature of the activity and the degree of trust. The factor of personal trust in general has acquired enormous importance.

- The culture of security in the anarchist movement has grown at times. The giving of evidence in the course of criminal or administrative proceedings in the overwhelming majority of cases was considered an act incompatible with further participation in the movement. Even the very fact of dealing with garbage is now equated with a gross violation of safety rules. Using Tor Browser, VPN, PGP-encryption was not an exception, but the norm of life.

- Anarchists were in the immediate focus of attention of the special services. If earlier this place was occupied by the opposition, now the resources spent by the state on struggle against anarchists, have repeatedly increased. Against the anarchists, in addition to the KGB, there is a whole department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. To cover the anarchist meetings and detain anarchists without hesitation, not only the OMON but also the SBR are involved. It was recorded the use of advanced technical means (wiretapping in the premises, finding the signal of a mobile phone), not to mention the external observation.

4.The division of activists into "legal" and "illegal" ones turned out to be largely ephemeral and meaningless, as well as accusations against "illegal ones" on the part of the "moderate" that the former substitute them for repression by conducting radical actions (and such reproaches sounded repeatedly in the first months after detention). It became clear that any activity is dangerous for the state, and any attempts by anarchists to organize themselves and declare themselves will be harshly suppressed. At the same time, debris actively tried and attempted to split the anarchist movement along the "radical / moderate" line. Although it is quite obvious that the changes in the legislation that followed in 2010 completely all the anarchist activity was outlawed. For 2.5 years, villages Polienko - just unsuccessfully taking part in the "critical mass". After a permitted meeting with anarchists, he was sentenced to 3 years old by Svyatoslav Baranovich - not even an anarchist at all. To attack the absolutely peaceful and legal (from the point of view of the law) camp under Krupki was attracted by the SOBR. Even those whose activities are far from being "incendiary" are being detained. From all this, it follows that one should not play up to the rubbish in their logic, and that in any repression against the anarchists, the state is guilty, and not other anarchists. And also that in the anarchist movement, any methods of struggle have the right to exist, and the criterion for their evaluation may not be the strength of the "rebuff" from the System, but only their political effectiveness at the moment. Even those whose activities are far from being "incendiary" are being detained. From all this, it follows that one should not play up to the rubbish in their logic, and that in any repression against the anarchists, the state is guilty, and not other anarchists. And also that in the anarchist movement, any methods of struggle have the right to exist, and the criterion for their evaluation may not be the strength of the "rebuff" from the System, but only their political effectiveness at the moment. Even those whose activities are far from being "incendiary" are being detained. From all this, it follows that one should not play up to the rubbish in their logic, and that in any repression against the anarchists, the state is guilty, and not other anarchists. And also that in the anarchist movement, any methods of struggle have the right to exist, and the criterion for their assessment may not be the strength of the "rebuff" from the System, but only their political effectiveness at the moment.

Two thousand and ten years was the most important lesson for our movement. Heavy, painful, but in fact necessary. It was an exam and a transition to a qualitatively new stage at the same time. Without a doubt, on our way to the revolution we are faced with even more difficult trials, complex decisions, adversities and difficulties. And we can survive them only in the same way as we experienced 2010: mobilizing all our courage and loyalty to ideas. The guarantee of our survival in 2018, as well as 8, and 100 years ago, is mutual support, iron solidarity and trust in our circles.

https://abc-belarus.org/?p=11863
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center