A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) US, black rose fed: JOEL OLSON: WHAT IS WHITE SUPREMACY?
Wed, 23 May 2018 07:32:33 +0300
This piece outlining the history and practice of white supremacy in the United States was
published as part of the Lexicon pamphlet series created by the Institute for Anarchist
Studies which "aims to convert words into politically helpful tools." Author Joel Olson
was a committed organizer, thinker and active within US anarchist politics for many years.
He authored The Abolition of White Democracy and you can find more of his writings here.
---- By Joel Olson ---- Biologically speaking,there's no such thing as race. As hard as
they've tried, scientists have never been able to come up with an adequate definition of
it. Yet the social and political effects of race are very real. Race is like a dollar
bill-a human creation rather than a fact of nature that has value only because people say
it does. And like money, people give race "value" because it serves a function in society.
That function in the United States is to suppress class conflict.
In the United States, the system of race (what we now call "white supremacy") emerged in
the late 1600s to preserve the land and power of the wealthy. Rich planters in Virginia
feared what might happen if indigenous tribes, slaves, and indentured servants united and
overthrew them. Through a series of laws, they granted the English poor certain rights and
privileges denied to all persons of African and Native American descent: the right to be
excluded from enslavement, move about freely without a pass, acquire property, bear arms,
enjoy free speech and assembly, change jobs, and vote. For their part, they respected the
property of the rich, helped seize indigenous lands, and enforced slavery. In accepting
this arrangement, the English poor (now called "whites") went against their class
interests to serve their "racial" ones, and thereby reinforced the power of the rich.
This cross-class alliance between the ruling class and a section of the working class is
the genesis of white supremacy in the United States. It continues to this day. In this
system, members of the cross-class alliance get defined as white, while those excluded
from it are relegated to a "not-white" status. By accepting preferential treatment in an
economic system that exploits their labor, too, working-class members of the white group
or "race" have historically tied their interests to those of the elite rather than the
rest of the working class. This devil's bargain has undermined freedom and democracy ever
As this white alliance grew to include other ethnicities, the result was a curious form of
democracy: the white democracy. In the white democracy, all whites were considered equal
(even as the poor were subordinated to the rich and women were subordinated to men). At
the same time, every single white person was considered superior to every single person of
color. It was a system in which whites had an interest in and expectation of favored
treatment, in a society that claimed to be democratic. It was democracy for white folks,
but tyranny for everyone else.
In the white democracy, whites praised freedom, equality, democracy, hard work, and equal
opportunity, while simultaneously insisting on higher wages, preferential access to the
best jobs, informal unemployment insurance (first hired, last fired), full enjoyment of
civil rights, and the right to send their kids to the best schools, live in the nicest
neighborhoods, and receive decent treatment by the police. Even white women, who were
otherwise denied full citizenship, enjoyed the benefits of white democracy, such as the
right to legal representation, favored access to certain occupations (teaching, nursing,
and clerical work), easier access to better housing (including indoor plumbing, heat,
electricity, and time-saving household appliances), and/or the all-important guarantee
that their children would never be enslaved.
In exchange for these "public and psychological wages," as W.E.B. Du Bois called them,
whites agreed to enforce slavery, segregation, genocide, reservation, and other forms of
racial oppression. The result was that working-class whites and people of color were
oppressed because the working class was divided. The tragic irony is that many poor whites
often did not get to make use of these advantages, yet despite this, they defended them
The white democracy continues to exist, even after the end of slavery and legal
segregation. Take any social indicator-graduation rates, homeownership rates, median
family wealth, prison incarceration rates, life expectancy rates, infant mortality rates,
cancer rates, unemployment rates, or median family debt-and you'll find the same thing: in
each category, whites are significantly better off than any other racial group. As a
group, whites enjoy more wealth, less debt, more education, less imprisonment, more health
care, less illness, more safety, less crime, better treatment by the police, and less
police brutality than any other group. Some whisper that this is because whites have a
better work ethic. But U.S. history tells us that the white democracy, born over four
hundred years ago, lives on.
The white race, then, does not describe people from Europe. It is a social system that
works to maintain capitalist rule and prevent full democracy through a system of
(relatively minor) privileges for whites along with the subordination of those who are
defined as not white. The cross-class alliance thus represents one of the most significant
obstacles to creating a truly democratic society in the United States.
This is not to say that white supremacy is the "worst" form of oppression. All oppression
is equally morally wrong. Nor is it to imply that if white supremacy disappears, then all
other forms of oppression will magically melt away. It is simply to say that one of the
most significant obstacles to organizing freedom movements throughout U.S. history has
been the white democracy, and that it remains a major obstacle today.
In a global economy (and a global recession), corporate elites no longer want to pay white
workers the privileges they have historically enjoyed. Instead, they want to pay everyone
the same low wages and have them work under the same terrible conditions.
Generally speaking, whites have responded to this attempt to treat them like regular
workers in two ways. One is through "multiculturalism." This approach, popular in
universities and large corporations, seeks to recognize the equality of all cultural
identities. This would be fine, except multiculturalism regards white as one culture among
others. In this way, it hides how it functions as an unjust form of power.
Multiculturalism therefore fails to attack the white democracy. It leaves it standing.
The other response is color-blindness, or the belief that we should "get beyond" race. But
this approach also perpetuates the white democracy, because by pretending that race
doesn't exist socially just because it doesn't exist biologically, one ends up pretending
that white advantage doesn't exist either. Once again, this reproduces white democracy
rather than abolishes it.
There are right- and left-wing versions of color-blindness. On the Right, many whites
sincerely insist they aren't racist but nonetheless support every measure they can to
perpetuate their white advantages, including slashing welfare, strengthening the prison
system, undermining indigenous sovereignty, defending the "war on drugs," and opposing
"illegal immigration." On the Left, many whites assert that race is a "divisive" issue and
that we should instead focus on problems that "everyone" shares. This argument sounds
inclusive, but it really maintains the white democracy because it lets whites decide which
issues are everyone's and which ones are "too narrow." It is another way for whites to
expect and insist on favored treatment.
Multiculturalism and color-blindness (on the Right or Left) are no solution to white
supremacy. The only real option is for whites to reject the white democracy and side with
the rest of humanity. Fighting prisons, redlining, anti-immigrant laws, police brutality,
attacks on welfare (which are usually thinly disguised attacks on African Americans), and
any other form of racial discrimination are valuable ways to undermine the cross-class
alliance. So are struggles to defend indigenous sovereignty, affirmative action, embattled
ethnic studies programs in high schools and colleges, and the right for people of color to
caucus in organizations or movements. All of these struggles-which people of color engage
in daily, but whites only occasionally do, if at all-seek to undermine whites' interest in
and expectation of favored treatment. They point out the way toward a new society.
We can see this in U.S. history, when fights to abolish the cross-class alliance have
opened up radical possibilities for all people. Feminism in the 1840s and the movement for
the eight-hour day in the 1860s came out of abolitionism. Radical Reconstruction (1868-76)
very nearly built socialism in the South as it sought to give political and economic power
to the freedmen and women. The civil rights struggle in the 1960s not only overthrew legal
segregation, it also kicked off the women's rights, free speech, student, queer, peace,
Chicano, Puerto Rican, and American Indian movements. When the pillars of the white
democracy tremble, everything is possible. An attack on white supremacy raises the level
of struggle against oppression in general.
Even today, the white democracy stands at the path to a free society like
a troll at the bridge. The task is to chase the troll away, not to pretend it doesn't
exist or invite it to the multicultural table. Of course, this doesn't mean that people
currently defined as white would
have no role or influence in such a society. It only means that they would participate as
individuals equal to everyone else, not as a favored group.
Political movements in the United States must make the fight against any
expression of white democracy an essential part of their strategies. The expansion of
freedom for people of color has always expanded freedom for whites as well. Abolishing
white interests is not "divisive," "narrow," or "reverse racism." It's the key to a free
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-Infos Information Center