A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_ _The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours | of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) anarkismo.net: Australia: Working class, immigration crisis - Some initial thoughts by Dimitris Troaditis

Date Wed, 14 Jun 2017 06:22:58 +0300


... no longer see car queues of workers waiting every morning to go through the factory gate. No more factories. They have closed or transferred to Southeast Asian countries. Public banks and utilities have left the country or are about to leave. The trade union movement, which once covered half the employed workforce and rivaled the state for economic power, mostly located in disorderly retreat. ---- at the end of the 18th century, the English working class (the weavers, the laborers, the workers in the steel industry, miners and other sectors), lived largely in the province. There was employed at home or in small workshops, with strong connections to the village or the life of the local parish. However, by the early tou1830, many worked in large factories under the discipline of the superintendent and mechanical watches.

They began to live in squalid cities like Manchester, Liverpool and Leeds. Thousands and thousands of workers and their families huddled in dangerous slums where they died young and poor. The old world had now begun to transform.

The EPThompson tells us that in the long run and on average, that the Industrial Revolution did the British richest, but it was through a rampant exploitation and a callous violence, a series of economic ideas imposed from above, completely hostile and foreign to any sense of belonging to a certain joint project for the good of all. An ideology that espoused that all kinds of bosses and only them.

Why start this our presentation on the situation of the English working class? But simply because it has been and continues to exist (any mutatis mutandis) and Australia's problem too. Because something similar to the story of EPThompson in England during the first three decades of the 1800s occurred in Australia and throughout almost the 20th century, but especially since the mid-1980s until today.

And the procedure does not take into account both the degree of misery, but the pace and scale of social and economic changes that have occurred. The transformation from industrial to post-industrial era was so integral that it is no exaggeration to say that from a sociological point of view is equivalent to a disappearance, genocide.

At just 30 years-the same time period extending from the mid 1980s until today an economy previously served in one way or another (always mutatis mutandis) the entire community, now serving a small group of investors , capitalists, bosses generally enslaving them almost all the rest.

A little history

But how Australia was created as we know it? To understand more or less how the Australian state was created, the economy and, basically, imperialism (in the wider Southeast Asia) will cite some historical data.

It is estimated that before the arrival of white colonists in Australia, in 1788, lived across the country, in harmony with the natural environment, hundreds of thousands of indigenous people (300,000 for some, for others up to 1,000,000) 50,000 years. They indigenous Australian peoples milousanperissoteres than 250 languages and 700 dialects, had their own social and economic organization, their own nomadic and collective culture. These people gradually decimated because of the violent colonization of white Vretanoafstralon, deliberate spreading infections in their ranks, epidemics and all kinds of diseases and the current cultural genocide policies against them.

They spent several decades by the social and political awakening and emancipation movements to kick start their struggle from the 1930s yet, that Australian Aborigines officially rejoining the map of the country with the 1967 referendum, when it was decided to be counted for the first time in inventories (!) and their issues to handle the federal government of the country. Today, about 700,000 of the 24 million inhabitants of the country, define themselves as "native" or "indigenous origin". Year milestone in their relations with whites was the 1992 decision of the Supreme Court of the country, according to which Australia was not «terra-nullius» (license earth as claimed whites), before the British arrival and indigenous land rights are sovereign and can claim compensation (although under certain conditions).

Decisive steps institutionalized exploitation of

the Province of Australia was formed in 1901. Bases were, on the one hand, the church and state separation, legislating, but, on the other, the concept of the country's citizens mainly based on this white Vretanoafstralou. This policy prevailed and dominated until the Second World War. For argument's sake, one of the first acts of the new state, was to restrict immigration. The country had to settle white people coming mostly from Europe.

Also, in the early 20th century, people with different racial and cultural characteristics, were considered alien and inferior to the established and prevailing Anglo-Celtic tradition and potentially dangerous.

The stranger, the immigrant, the racially outside the dominant vretanoafstralianis society is partly socially acceptable, but only as a law abiding entity, only, that is, as a worker and, indeed, multiple operator. Neither reason is for the maintenance or development of specific ethnic and cultural origins and traditions and in any cases allowed such a thing, it must be consistent and comply with the prevailing policy.

Beyond that, the 'gigantism' Australia becomes an issue and economic development and protection of so-called national security. This made war with the mass migration programs are epic. On one hand, the Australian state managed, among other things, to triple the population of the country and bring the country immigrants from more than 150 and most diverse countries on the other, however, it was achieved without altering the dominant Anglo-Celtic character of the Australian society.

So while the stranger, the immigrant, is quite visible in the newly established state, indigenous, indigenous, however, rendered and institutional invisible without recorded its presence in inventories until 1967 without the right of ownership is recognized - in his own earth-until 1992!

But even for white loyalists Southern European immigrants (Greeks, Italians, Yugoslavs and others), the pre-war Australia was particularly harsh and inhospitable country. The profiling and restrictions that time, violent riots and explosions against non-British immigrant origin, especially the period of World War II, some illustrative cases of open hostility.

The establishment of immigrant communities and their leading role can, on one hand, be aimed at maintaining the cultural identity of immigrants, but targeted and their cultural discipline, namely the promotion of good model, collaborative, law-abiding, submissive and non-Protestants to the dominant culture and view immigrant. This position was supported and continues to advance and so far from the immigration newspapers and the media, the church and the leaders of immigrant organizations and bodies.

Multiculturalism in neosyntirismou service and personalization

war, in response to the experience of the Second World War, the alliance relations of Australia with several European countries (including Greece) and the beginning of mass immigration, which was absorbed in every aspect of economic activity mainly in the area of unskilled industrial work (automotive, and construction of major projects), proved really more than profitable, highly auriferous policies for the Australian capital.

To proceed, even more in the direction of ever increasing profit, the Australian capital assisted by the state, and to achieve it as painlessly as possible, adopted from the early 1970s until the mid-1990s-period where he rose to the surface neosyntiritismos- the principle of liberal multi-ethnism / multi-culture, an ideology that aftoprovlithike as neutral guarantor of educational, cultural, labor and other rights of old and new immigrants, without, of course, as we said before, lose or abandon the white vretanoafstraliana features.

Thus, by a very personalized "egalitarianism" and "fairness" of immigrants, the non vretanoafstralianos population of the country led to a much painless incorporation trunk white Vretanoafstralias. At the same time the dominant whites freed from the burden of violent conquest and exclusion of indigenous and this is because the rulers are the only whites and already proven social group that can guarantee national cohesion of the country.

On the other hand, the old immigrants still basically remain eternal foreigners, since-especially in the last 15 years- relatively new immigrant communities (mostly Muslims) are treated suspiciously by the dominant nationality as the potentially dangerous terrorists, subversive "eternal foreigners".

The destruction of community spirit

So we arrived at the current point where many Australians now enjoy the benefits of secure, full-time - although most already marked disturbing vibrations.

This is because we no longer employee car queues waiting every morning to go through the factory gate. No more factories. They have closed or transferred to Southeast Asian countries. Public banks and utilities have left the country or are about to leave. The trade union movement, which once covered half the employed workforce and rivaled the state for economic power, mostly located in disorderly retreat.

The security, full employment, holidays, sick leave and all that, in many sectors have been eliminated or tend to be eliminated. The dream of the working class for housing, for social advancement through acquiring cheap land, equal educational opportunities and others are into steam.

In just 30 years, the Australian working class, with the factories and trade unions, the quality of public services and communities, has almost disappeared ... With a "revolution." The Australian working class has been a serious identity problem.

On the other hand, politicians and economists have brought the Australian working class in this situation, shamelessly call them all "great era of economic reform." Never afraid to proclaim the "hits" them. Anyone who knows English and can get on the web sites of newspapers such as the Australian Financial Review or The Australian, any day of the week, can clearly determine it. However, none of this does not reflect the full story.

And the full truth is more dramatic, more morally loaded and less one-sided. The period between 1983 and 2015, Australia has experienced not just a benign economic reform, but a social and economic revolution as great as ever in its history, which of course has done good and could have been done differently. This is the true story of modern Australian political, social and economic history: here occurred a revolution in which the people were defeated.

Will lead to new poverty?

Three decades ago, the average wage in Australia was $ 12 an hour for a full-time employee. Although the country is on track continuous development for almost a quarter century, the structural changes in the labor force of the country have led to the emergence of a new class of low-paid workers who attributed the phenomenon of falling prices of a range of goods and services.

This, however, is a double-edged sword because you low wages to foster the competitiveness of the economy at the same time, however, undermine domestic demand and growth. Employers treat many means to reduce labor costs, either by hiring more part-time or casual workers or trainees and / or immigrants with temporary visas. Specifically, in the retail and catering sector, the trend is to base the market in low paid work force.

?Recently, the Australian Bureau of Statistics released the national wage report, which records the lowest growth rate in its history: 0.5% for the first quarter of this year, or 2.1% by June.

Most importantly, this trend is not only continuing, but increasing. In the survey of July recorded drop of 0.1% in unemployment, due to the increase of part-time, which is longer to the 32% of workers, i.e. one in three people. This increase in the partial time at the expense of full time.

Attempting to dispel impressions, the federal government, through the Finance minister, Scott Morrison, said that this means that Australia has a more flexible labor market, which is good, both for workers and for employers.

?"I know some see some chores derogatory, but I do not. A job is a job and to have more good, "said the minister.

The position is fully in line with the theory that wants part-time work and lower-paying positions better than unemployment, but does not reach the critical question about the impact of this on the purchasing power of workers and the threat to the overall consumption may cause stagnation of economic growth.

Is the home the bomb in the foundations?

Also, Australia is in the middle of a crisis in terms of affordable housing. Rents in almost all cities of Australia are unaffordable for the low paid. These have soared to such heights that some tenants are forced to pay up to 85% of their income to stay somewhere!

According to various bodies and studies have found that "middle-income employees are driven under stress, as high rents" chew "their incomes that can not compensate for the rise in housing costs. Over the past decade, rents in the States capitals of the country have increased by 52%, forcing many people to live outside city centers and creating huge mortgage stress to those who stay in them.

The high rates of home ownership make unrealistic dream for many. The average ratio of house prices to income in Sydney nine to one, compared with 6.2 for one in New York and 7.3 to one in London. Even Adelaide is more expensive than New York!

On average, home prices reach $ 995 804 in Sydney and $ 726 962 in Melbourne. Many households already have huge debts to the fulfillment of the "Australian dream". The debts on mortgages is now 120% of GDP in Australia, the highest rate in the industrialized world.

It not excluded that in the next decade, Australia may face wave of home foreclosures and bankruptcies, similar to those in the US and Europe.

According to a recent study of Bill Randolph and Laurence Troy (the Futures Research Centre, published in the Sydney Morning Herald newspaper last March, named series of government policies -as called negative gearing and the discount of 50% on capital gains tax the property-investors as responsible for the economic crisis and fidelity.

the Randolph and Troy described the deteriorating situation, which is "both profitable and subsidized by the government", "taxation madness and national scandal." there is no doubt that housing policies that give priority to investors at the expense of the welfare of ordinary people, have fueled the housing crisis. Since the 1980s, both of the major parties in Australia (Liberals and Labor - which is the only alternating the government) have implemented a policy under which reduced tax revenues, but also the real estate speculation fueled.

https://www.anarkismo.net/article/30331
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center