A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Irish Anarchist Review #5 - Towards an anarchist anti-racism
Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:50:00 +0200
[In a thought-provoking piece http://www.wsm.ie/c/toward-anarchist-anti-racism which
challenges all of us to “… look at ourselves on a personal level, recognise privilege and
develop a wider critique that is truer to our own politics…” Dónal O Driscoll explores
“what it means to be anti-racist from an anarchist perspective.” He explores two important
principles of anti-racism - the recognition that many of us have privileges simply because
of our skin colour or ethnic group and the challenge of giving voice to the oppressed.]
---- While there is a tradition of grassroots campaigning against racism in Ireland, there
is less discussion of what it means to be an anti-racist from an anarchist perspective.
Most material focuses on obvious forms such as hate-speech or supporting Travellers &
migrants in practical terms. The issue this article seeks to raise, is that in order to
get it right we also need to look at ourselves on a personal level, recognise privilege
and develop a wider critique that is truer to our own politics. As such I am writing as a
white anarchist, to other white anarchists.
To state the obvious: we anarchists are against racism - or at least we proclaim to be in
every statement that seeks to set out a policy of inclusion. That is, we, the
predominantly white people who rarely experience racial prejudice, proclaim it.
But is that necessarily true in fact? The implicit assumption is that espousing anarchist
politics is sufficient to be anti-racist, but do we check if that is actually the case? Do
do we ask those who are on the receiving end of oppression if we are actually creating
Unfortunately, there are distinctions that we often gloss over to avoid somewhat
uncomfortable truths. Anti-racism, I argue, needs more than class analysis to be
What is Racism?
There are several types of racism. First, there is the overt discrimination based on
seeing someone as inferior because of a perceived difference, usually to do with
ethnicity. This ranges from hate speech and direct abuse, not treating people equally in
employment or in the statements that use generalisations that tar entire groups of people
with the same brush.
The second is the institutionalised racism that comes with more subtle forms of government
or company policy, which appear to treat everyone as equal but actually disadvantage
particular groups. In this, it is not the individuals, but the entire system that
perpetuates discrimination for its own purposes.
The third is the internalised racism of society, a cultural racism, that manifests itself
in all sorts of hidden ways, particularly in privileges that we are so used to that we are
effectively blind to them.
The first two are relatively easy to recognise for those of us coming from an anarchist
background. Through our work on class and anti-State politics, we can see the oppression
inherent in such institutions - immigration policies being the standard one, but also
social policy such as education. The analysis of discrimination against one group of
people is relatively easily applied to others. A clear example is the treatment of
Travellers who face coercion by state organisations for not conforming to a particular set
of norms and live in a country where the use of derisive names such as ‘knackers’ is seen
As such, the ways to challenge, name and reject these forms of racism are fairly
straight-forward. It sits easily with our existing critiques of domination and is easily
incorporated, as if that was enough. It is the third aspect that is not caught in this net
and slips through as we believe we have done enough. However, it is this that forms the
core of much anti-racist organisation and theory globally. At the very centre is the
notion of privilege.
A problem facing anarchists is that much of the realm in which racism is experienced, and
anti-racism needs to take place, is the liberal sphere. All too easily, the espousal of
equality for all is co-opted and depoliticised: turned into self-serving bureaucracies
that simply maintain the privileges of the dominant group.
The Israeli-Irish commentator Ronit Lentin puts this nicely:1
“However, one of the most important questions asked in relation to antiracism is ‘who
speaks for whom, who says what and from where?’ Antiracism can be either generalised –
intending to raise awareness among the population and reach a post-racial ‘racelessness’,
or colour blindness. Or it can be self-representational, where the lived experience of the
racialised informs the struggle. Generalist antiracism is anchored in universal values
such as democracy, human rights, equality and tolerance; it reduces the importance of
state racism and emphasises individual (or institutional) prejudice. In contrast, self
organising antiracism stresses the role of the state, which focuses on notions of the race
idea rooted in the political structure. The lived experience of the protagonists informs
the struggle and names the state as the main culprit rather than stress individual
prejudice, a way of depoliticising racism and antiracism.”
As she points out elsewhere, many of the anti-racist groups in Ireland are led by white,
middle-class people, not by the people they are meant to be representing.
Thus, part of the role that anarchists can and should be playing is ensuring that racism
is not depoliticised as an issue. Anarchism’s emphasis on self-organisation and critique
of the state means that this can be accommodated within our existing politics. Though it
is not as straight-forward as we like to think: to be effective ‘allies’, it is important
that we do not depoliticise it unwittingly in our own actions.
An Anarchist Anti-Racism?
Anarchism brings a recognition of how class, state and capitalism play a role in creating
and maintaining oppression of many kinds. However, eliminating these three problems will
not simply ‘solve’ racism. We still have to confront our own privilege, but with the added
challenge of staying true to our own political framework.
There has been a lot of exploration of cultural racism and how it can be challenged from a
radical perspective – see the writings of Audre Lorde, bell hooks and Lena Dominelli for
example. What has emerged is a theory based around privilege and challenging existing
Thus, anti-racism includes two important principles. The first is to recognize that we
have privileges simply because of our skin colour or ethnic group. We may not like that we
have those privileges due to something we could not control – being born – but the first
step is not denying that we have them.
The second principle is giving voice to the oppressed, not speaking on their behalf or
seeking to dictate how they should define or resist their oppression.
Both work hand in hand and make demands of us, often uncomfortable ones as we are being
asked to face up to things on personal level. It requires that we take a back seat in
driving the politics and also that we are proactive in challenging ourselves.
There are increasing amounts of resources available, much of which can be adapted to the
particular context of racism within Ireland, and which are generally applicable to
combating forms of discrimination other than racism.
By focusing around the issue of voices and privilege, these can be incorporated into an
effective anarchist anti-racism: one that does not merely pay lip-service to the idea.
There are, however, several issues of particular relevance to us:
Because we perceive ourselves as anti-racist, we often act as if someone’s skin colour or
other ethnic feature is not there. We want to be ‘colour-blind’, so to speak. The problem
is: this ignores the fact that the other person’s colour is a real feature, part of their
identity, and affects them in their daily interactions. It is not a neutral thing, and by
us pretending that it is, we are denying their experience from their point of view.
By not seeing colour you are not seeing or celebrating the difference, and you are not
seeing the hidden racism. As white people we have the privileges that are commonplace to
us, that we can simply assume, and thus we often do not realise just how privileged we
are. We can often walk away from situations that people from different ethnic groups cannot.
This is a liberal concept, often readily accepted in anarchist circles without question.
It was made famous through Voltaire’s (misattributed) quote - “I do not agree with what
you say, but I’ll defend to the death your right to say it” - now taken as dogma in
liberal-left quarters. I would argue that it is not actually anarchist. There are many
things we do not tolerate – fascist street stalls for instance. However, to tolerate means
that you acknowledge that someone is different and though you are not happy with that
difference you are able co-exist in some way. It is not acceptance.(2)
It is this recognition of the problems with tolerance that underlies critiques of
multiculturalism as an approach to culturally diverse societies (3). This is a place where
anarchist thought has a strength that other ideologies do not. There is scope in it for
accepting diversity, for acknowledging difference as a good thing, not to be feared,
without having to accept all aspects unconditionally. However, we have to be both more
explicit and more nuanced in how we approach it. As well as challenging society as a
whole, it includes:
(a) developing positions that recognise the oppression on a practical level in our own
particular cultures; and
(b) finding ways to show grassroots solidarity that do not repeat patterns of privilege to
the detriment of the groups we want to support in their struggles.
But what about...
Finally, we need to be alert to a fear or ‘detour’ that often comes up in privileged
groups, that of pointing to other groups and saying how much worse they are on some other
issue of discrimination. Though a natural response, that does not make it right. It is a
divide and rule game allowing us to ignore what is before us while playing to dominant
fears that are being used by politicians with aims we are opposed to.
This is not to deny that there are issues, but that we should make sure our own house is
in order first before imposing our will on another culture. In many cases it is possible
to find organisations from within those cultures, often at great risk, who have a nuanced,
considered view of how to integrate the competing demands, which do not play into
narratives of hate. Thus, rather than attacking an entire culture and dictating how they
should behave, we can find places to show practical solidarity in line with our own
politics and challenge racists subtexts with our own communities.
This has only been a brief overview of the topic, touching lightly on many of the problems
around forming an effective anti-racist politics. In a subsequent article I look at more
practical examples of cultural racism, particularly around notions of land using Northern
Ireland and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict to unpick some of the deeper assumptions.
Guest writer: Dónal O Driscoll
Note: many of the following resources are based on the situation in the US. Each country /
culture has its own contexts and ways in which oppression is imposed and experienced, so
much will not necessarily translate directly across to Ireland. However, many of the
underlying messages do.
Anti-Racist Social Work, Lena Dominelli.
Rethinking Multiculturalism, Bhikhu Parekh.
Paul Kivel: http://www.paulkivel.com
Resist Racism: http://resistracism.wordpress.com/racism-101/
People of Colour Organize – hard hitting texts challenging problems in white anti-racism:
Colours of Resistance, anarchist analyses of anti-racism: http://www.coloursofresistance.org/
Racial Equality Tools: http://www.racialequitytools.org
Allies for Change: http://alliesforchange.org/
Articles & Blogs
1. Race Revolt – a zine on race politics by feminists and queers: http://www.racerevolt.org.uk
2. Text of a 1994 talk on Racism (WSM): http://struggle.ws/talks/racism.html
3. Anarchism, Racism & Class Struggle (WSM): http://struggle.ws/rbr/rbr4_racism.html
4. Detour-Spotting for white anti-racists, Joan Olsson:
5. Checklist for Allies Against Racism, John Raible: http://johnraible.wordpress.com
6. Tiffany, Friend of People of Colour, Audrey Thompson:
7. So you think you are an anti-racist?, Paul Gorski & Multicultural Pavilion:
8. I don’t see colour, I just see a human being, Abagond:
9. New Code of Ethics for Anti-Racist White Allies, JLove & Tim Wise:
10. Ten Things to Remember: Anti-Racist Strategies for White Students, Chris Dixon:
11. Beyond the Whiteness: Global Capitalism and White Supremacy: thoughts on movement
building and anti-racist organizing, Chris Crass:
12. A few good reasons why white people should not wear ‘Mohawks’ or dreadlocks, C.K.
Donovan & Q-L. Driskill: http://zinelibrary.info/files/dreads.pdf
13. Ronit Lentin, Israeli-Irish blogger on racism: http://www.ronitlentin.net/
14. The Katrina Reader, articles on anti-racism in the context of solidarity following
Hurricane Katrina: http://katrinareader.org/toc/617
Residents Against Racism: http://www.residentsagainstracism.org/
European Network Against Racism Ireland: http://enarireland.org
Irish Travellers Network: http://www.itmtrav.ie
Traveller Solidarity Network: http://travellersolidarity.org
Collective Liberation: http://collectiveliberation.org/
2 For good arguments about tolerance see, for example, Slavoj Žižek’s Living in End Times.
3 Excellently spelled out in Bhikhu Parekh’s Rethinking Multiculturalism.
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-Infos Information Center