A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Irish Anarchist Review #5 - Torture, Murder & Exclusion: Irelandâs first 10 years of Independence
Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:58:38 +0300
The 1916 proclamation, the manifesto of the 1916 rebels, states: âThe Republic guarantees
religious and civil liberty, equal rights and equal opportunities to all its citizens, and
declares its resolve to pursue the happiness and prosperity of the whole nation and of all
its parts, cherishing all the children of the nation equally, and oblivious of the
differences carefully fostered by an alien government, which have divided a minority from
the majority in the past.â ---- These noble aspirations would become almost a bible of
Irish Republican ideals and within six years, after the end of the War of Independence in
1922, a section of that movement had a chance to implement these ideals. However the
society established after the war of independence âThe Irish Free Stateâ was a pale shadow
of even the most modest interpretation of this document. Civil liberties were almost non
existent, citizens were not equal, with women becoming second class while the poor were
plunged further into destitution.
The early story of the Irish Free State is one of a dark authoritarian regime based on
repression, discrimination and censorship where the elite of nationalist Ireland
re-established control over a society that had teetered on the verge of revolution for
years. Their deeply authoritarian attitude to politics was underscored by severe catholic
morality which stifled culture and allowed no political debate or opposition of any kind.
By 1937 the âThe Irish Free Stateâ had created a society that had betrayed the ideals of
what many had set out to achieve two decades earlier.
Over two articles Fin Dwyer will examine the path which saw revolutionary Ireland descend
into conservative authoritarianism, first looking at the establishment of the state
through the civil war and its aftermath and then, in the next issue, looking at its social
programme in the later 20âs and 1930âs
War of Independence and Revolution
Within a few years of the 1916 rebellion the Irish Republican movement found itself
transformed from a relatively marginal group to being one of the key political forces in
early 20th century Ireland. In 1917 when the British Army faced a manpower crisis in World
War I conscription was threatened in Ireland. This was deeply unpopular and the Republican
movement grew quickly as they had consistently and militantly opposed World War I since
its outbreak in 1914.
The movement grew from strength to strength and by 1919 a full-scale war of Independence
was under way. Over the following two years the basis of British power in Ireland
collapsed and groups traditionally frozen out of society began to assert their power, most
notably women and workers.
In the decade before independence women had made great strides in their struggle for
equality. After years of struggle, albeit with opposition, women were forcing their way
into politics best symbolised by the republican socialist Constance Markievicz, who was
the first woman elected to the house of Commons in the 1918 election. Markieviczâs formal
role as a military leader during the 1916 rebellion would have been unthinkable in the
previous century. This surge of activity from women was reflected through the ranks of the
republican movement with womenâs organisations like Cumann na mBan and Inghinidhe na hÃireann.
Cumann na mBan
Although not feminist in any sense of the word their very existence showed a marked change
from the last period of radicalism in Ireland in the 1880âs when women had struggled to
get any acknowledgement for their participation in the Land War of 1879 -1882. The Ladies
Land League was castigated by nearly all sections of society and only received limited
acknowledgement when the Land League itself was proscribed. While womenâs liberation had a
long way to go through the second decade of the 20th century, change seemed imminent. This
mood was reflected by the fact that equality of the sexes was enshrined in both the 1919
democratic programme of the first DÃil and the 1922 constitution.
The other group in society to surge forward was Irelandâs organised Labour Movement.
Although resoundingly defeated in 1913 during the Dublin Lock Out, by 1919 the Trade Union
movement in Ireland had been reorganised and was immensely powerful. Aside from IRA
activity, organised labour had played a prominent role during the war of Independence.
Along with numerous general strikes including one in support of IRA hunger strikes in
1920, there were 233 other strikes that same year and even the establishment of an albeit
brief workersâ soviet in Limerick in 1919. They also played a crucial role in the war
itself when transport unions refused to transport war supplies or soldiers for the British
The Birth of The Free State
After years of conflict, strikes and assassinations a temporary truce was called in 1921
between the IRA and the British Government. This was followed by negotiations which
produced the famous Anglo Irish Treaty. It clearly fell short of the aims of the
Republican movement. The six counties that today form Northern Ireland were to remain part
of the United Kingdom while Ireland was not to become a Republic but aâFree Stateâ within
the British Empire.
When the document was debated in Ireland it created huge division. The DÃil (the Irish
Parliament) eventually narrowly passed the treaty 56-48.
Post Independence Hopes
After independence both women and workers had high hopes that the society being forged in
Ireland would protect their new found power but over the following decade these groups
were harshly suppressed by the new Irish government. Irelandâs new political elite would
effectively hope to turn the clock back and enforce the status quo that had existed in
Ireland years if not decades before the war of Independence.
However, first to learn the authoritarian nature of the new state were the former comrades
of the new government who opposed the treaty. A few months after Independence a civil war
broke out between the pro and anti-treaty sides which the new government fought in the
most ferocious manner. Often seen as an internal fight within the Republican Movement the
civil war had immense ramifications for the wider society. The basic attitudes of how the
new Irish elite would rule the Irish Free State were laid bare in what was a brutal struggle.
The build up to civil war
As soon as the DÃil ratified the treaty the President Eamon de Valera resigned and walked
out uttering the words âI am not going to connive at setting up in Ireland another
Government for Englandâ. He was soon joined by many other republican TDs who opposed the
Treaty including Harry Boland, Constance Markievicz and Cathal Brugha. In their absence
those republicans who supported the treaty set about establishing a government. Among the
key figures were WT Cosgrave, Kevin O Higgins, Richard Mulcahy, Arthur Griffith and
The first major challenge of the new government was how they would deal with opponents of
the Treaty. These opponents, while in a minority, significantly had a majority of support
within the army â the IRA. When senior anti-treaty members of the IRA called a convention
on March 26th 1922, in spite of a government ban, 52 out of 73 brigades attended and
rejected the Treaty, proclaiming the parliament had betrayed the republican ideal by
ratifying the treaty.
Over the next few months the Free State reacted by establishing a new army â the National
Army - to break its dependence on an organisation who it could not control and which
clearly did not support it. In June an election was held in which the anti treaty side
received 21% while the pro treaty side received almost 40% of the vote. While this was
interpreted as a mandate by those in favour of the treaty, those opposed to the treaty
were unmoved. Liam Mellows, an opponent of the treaty, remarked it was not the âwill of
the peopleâ but âthe fear of the peopleâ in reference to the British threat to wreak a
terrible war if the treaty was rejected.
For reasons beyond the scope of this article, which are highly debated among historians,
the opposing sides ended up in conflict within a few days of the election, precipitated by
the Free Stateâs âNational Armyâ shelling a 3 month IRA occupation of the Four courts on
June 26th 1922. This was after 3 months of effort by groups within both camps to avoid
conflict. Understanding the nature of this conflict is key to understanding the origins of
the nature of Authoritarianism in Ireland after Independence.
The Civil War
It became evident very quickly that the Pro Treaty forces were going to emerge victorious.
The Anti Treaty IRAâs sole point of unity was that they opposed the Treaty. Identifying
other goals which unified them is impossible as they encompassed republicans of both the
left and right. This lack of unity hamstrung their ability to act. While the pro-Treaty
side were also politically very diverse they had unity originating not the least from the
fact that they could claim a mandate from the 1922 election.
Within a few weeks the I.R.A. forces were decisively defeated in Dublin and Cork city was
captured on August 10th. By early August the overall threat being posed by the Anti-Treaty
I.R.A. was diminishing given they had already lost every urban area and Liam Lynch the
Chief of Staff of the IRA gave the order to resort to guerilla warfare on August 10th.
A few days later, Michael Collins, the key figure in the Free State Government, now a
general in the National Army, was killed in an ambush in West Cork at BÃal na mBlÃth on
August 22nd 1922. His death unleashed and unmasked the true authoritarianism that lay
behind the Free State government. Instead of trying to de-escalate a conflict they were
clearly winning the authoritarianism of the government politicians demanded an absolute
annihilation of the I.R.A.
Following Collinsâ death nearly a year of terrifying brutality saw the Free State National
Army breach several articles of The Hague convention of 1907, the eraâs equivalent of the
Geneva Convention. Far from the lofty heights of ensuring civil liberties for the people
of Ireland they engaged in a campaign of brutal repression.
At Oriel house in Dublin, the Free State set up the Criminal Investigation Department
where ex IRA members waged a campaign of torture and killings against anti-treaty
republicans. After the killing of Collins they killed four republicans in Dublin and
dumped their bodies. This would result in 21 deaths in Dublin alone by the end of the war.
These activities were not just those of a few men who had gone off the edge, but that of
a 250 strong force operating in Dublin city centre.
During the second half of 1922 the National Army made several naval landings into Munster
where the IRA remained strongest. In a ruthless campaign prisoners were frequently
executed. Again this cannot be explained away as just the activities of soldiers hardened
by war, indeed far from it. By September 18th 1922 reports of the executions of prisoners
were forwarded to cabinet but nothing was done save Richard Mulcahy agreeing to help
remove soldiers who had a problem with such activity. The activity was in effect condoned
by Patrick Hogan Minister for Land and Agriculture when he said that the ânational army
are a little too ready to take prisonersâ.
Further to this the government itself passed legislation which effectively legalised
similar executions. On 28th September the sitting members of the DÃil had overwhelming
(48-18) endorsed legislation that removed jury trials for numerous activities and allowed
military courts to try civilians with death sentences being handed down to those carrying
weapons. On October 3rd they offered an amnesty lasting only two weeks before the military
courts began a killing spree endorsed by cabinet which saw dozens of people executed.
On November 10th Erskine Childers, who had signed the treaty but opposed its
recommendations, was arrested, tried and executed for being in possession of an ornamental
gun given to him as a wedding present by Michael Collins himself. Worse was yet to come.
The IRA responded in kind and on November 27th Liam Lynch issued an order that any TD who
voted for this legislation, which was dubbed the âMurder Billâ, was to be executed on
sight. Two weeks later two government T.D.âs Sean Hales and Padraig O MÃille were shot.
Hales died of his wounds.
In response the government decided to execute four prominent republicans being held in
Mountjoy jail in Dublinâ Liam Mellows (IRA quarter master), Joe McKelvey (former IRA Chief
of Staff) , Rory OâConnor (IRA director of Engineering) and Dick Barrett. The sentiment
behind the government policy was outlined by WT Cosgrave in the statement âTerror will be
met with Terrorâ. Indeed nothing else could explain killing four men who could not
possibly have had any involvement given they were in prison since the first weeks of the
war. It has been argued that the time provoked desperate measures but even contemporaries
thought it was unjustifiable. Thomas Johnson, leader of the Labour Party which was neutral
in the civil war, described the enormity of what had happened:
âMurder most foul as in the best it is - but this most foul, bloody and unnatural. The
four men in Mountjoy have been in your charge for five monthsââ.. the Government of this
countryâthe Government of SaorstÃt Eireann, announces apparently with pride that they have
taken out four men, who were in their charge as prisoners, and as a reprisal for that
assassination murdered them.â..I wonder whether any member of the Government who has any
regard for the honour of Ireland, or has any regard for the good name of the State, or has
any regard for the safety of the State, will stand over an act of this kind.â
By March 1923 as the Free State was unquestionably on the verge of victory they began to
commit atrocities on an unprecedented scale in reaction to anti-treaty assassinations and
attacks on property. In Kerry at Cahirciveen, Killarney and Countess Bridge horrific
massacres of IRA prisoners were committed. The most notorious atrocity was that committed
at Ballyseedy, Co. Kerry where the National Army tied 9 IRA prisoners to a bridge before
detonating a landmine killing all except one - Stephen Fuller - who testified to the
The Civil war drew to a close in the early summer of 1923 and it was clear the Irish Free
State had fallen far short of the aims of the 1916 proclamation or even far more timid
aspirations. It has been argued that exceptional times called for exceptional measures,
however it is hard to see how such measures could ever be justifiable or excusable. Even
if it was justifiable it is difficult to see how the IRA posed such a threat to the state
after Michael Collinsâ death (the period that saw the worst persecution) that warranted
such a brutal response.
The Anti Treaty forces had always been seriously disunited and poorly armed with an
arguably non existent strategy. One of the events that heightened tensions in the run up
to war illustrated this. When an IRA unit occupied the Four Courts they were so disunited
that when the IRA chief of staff Liam Lynch attempted to gain entry on the 19th of June he
was locked out. Although Lynch eventually was able to repair the links with the four
courts garrison it was indicative of wider problems that such squabbling was ongoing
within days of the civil war breaking out.
Their disunity through the following months stopped them utilising their numerical
strength. This was compounded by the fact several key figures within the anti Treaty
movement including Rory O Connor, Liam Mellows, Joe McKelvey, Cathal Brugha and Paddy O
Brien were captured or killed within a few days of the conflict starting. In essence they
were strategically reactionary. Their sole innovative move was the Four Courts occupation
in Spring 1922 after which they largely reacted to Free State activity: when the war
started when the Free State attacked the Four Courts garrison, they reverted to guerilla
warfare only after they had lost all urban centres and logically enough in this pattern
they responded to state terror with terror.
In this situation the Free State dictated the pace and course of the war. Using state
terror was clearly the worst path as the I.R.A. would respond in kind, illustrated by
Liam Lynch issuing assassination orders on all T.D.s who had voted for what they called
âThe Murder Billâ or the the ferocious brutality illustrated when the IRA killed Kevin O
Higginsâ elderly father on February 10th 1923 in reprisal for the execution of 33
prisoners in January.
Indeed arguably it was this repression and brutality that allowed what was a disunited
factious movement hold men as disparate as the communist Peader O Donnell and the
conservative catholic Liam Lynch together. Had the Free State executed the war in a less
authoritarian manner they could have surely undermined the basis of the IRA leadership.
Aside from two brief amnesties in late 1922 and February 1923, which seem to have been
more tokenistic than a real gesture to end the war, they fought in a manner which backed
the anti treaty side into a corner. The brutality if anything played into the hands of
militarists like Liam Lynch who argued for carrying on the war until they were utterly
Why did the Free State choose this strategy?
While the majority resented the civil war, the manner in which the new state had exacted
the war should have alarmed people. When Thomas Johnson the Labour leader vented his fury
over the execution of Mellowes, Barret, O Connor and McKelvey in December 1922, he said âI
am almost forced to say you have killed the new State at its birthâ but he missed the
point. They had not killed the state, quite the opposite.
They knew how weak the Anti Treaty forces were, indeed the secretary of the Free State
Government Diarmuid O Hegarty said âThe Government was, however, satisfied, that those
forces contained within themselves elements of disruption that given time would accomplish
their own disintegrationâ. Yet they still ruthlessly crushed them. The Free State were
well aware of what they were doing. The next ten years would show they had successfully
laid the groundwork for a deeply authoritarian state in the civil war, one they would use
to break all opposition regardless of its nature.
In this light their execution of the war did not augur well for the future, far from being
the concern of Anti-treaty republicans it should have alarmed wider society. Over the
following ten years they would apply an equally authoritarian outlook in enforcing their
view of society. Far from creating a stable society they forced well over half the
population into an oppressive existence.
Free State in Power
By early 1923 victory was inevitable and the Pro Treaty forces began to look to the
future. Since December the formation of a new party had been discussed and in April they
reorganised themselves into a new political party â Cumann na nGaedheal. This new party
was supposedly formed to transcend War of Independence politics, appealing to all sections
of society including those who had been opposed to Independence. Whilst theoretically a
nice idea it was in reality a rallying point for the conservative elite in Irish society
who had been divided between loyalist and nationalist, now effectively a redundant divide.
United in Cumann na nGaedheal they would set about re-establishing their authority after a
decade of social radicalism. In office they would introduce a plethora of authoritarian
reforms based on excluding various groups from society.
In May the I.R.A. all but accepted defeat when chief of staff Frank Aiken (Liam Lynch was
killed in April) issued the order to dump arms on May 24th. Over the next few months state
executions and torture tailed off â although Noel Lemass was executed and dumped by Free
State forces in Dublin as late as the summer of 1923. Comfortable in their power, having
annihilated and terrified the opposition, elections were held in August 1923.
The results were only mediocre for Cumann na nGaedhael. Given that many Anti Treaty
republican candidates were in prison, on the run or, in the case of Eamon de Valera,
arrested when trying to electioneer, the fact that Cumann na nGaedhael only returned with
39% was a poor showing. Lacking a majority they could only rule because the Anti-Treaty
republicans refused to sit in the parliament they saw as lacking legitimacy.
Cumann na nGaedheal in Government
Although the president of the administration was W.T. Cosgrave, the Cumann na nGaedheal
government was increasingly under the influence of the highly conservative faction centred
around the authoritarian Kevin O Higgins who famously quipped that Cumann na nGaedheal
were the âmost conservative-minded revolutionaries that ever put through a successful
revolutionâ. If anyone had any hope they would fulfil the 1916 ideal to âpursue the
happiness and prosperity of the whole nation and of all its partsâ they were about to be
sorely disappointed. The authoritarianism that governed their policy in the Civil War was
now to be turned on society at large.
Mary McSwiney Demonstration
Their willingness to use authoritarian measures on the civilian population had been
displayed as early as November 1922. When the anti-treaty activist Mary McSwiney was
interned this caused public anger. The 50 year old McSwiney, was one of the most famous
female republican activists hailing from the same family as the republican martyr, former
Lord Mayor of Cork Terence McSwiney, who had died on hunger strike during the war of
Independence in 1920. When McSwiney went on hunger strike in prison on November 4th, a
demonstration was called to protest against her incarceration. On November 9th a large
demonstration of women gathered in Dublin city centre. With no apparent provocation the
National Army arrived and fired shots at the demonstration. Although no one was killed, 14
were injured in the ensuing stampede.
Post office strike
The stateâs use of authoritarian measures was increasingly evident not just through its
prosecution of the civil war but also the way it dealt with internal dissent. In September
1922 , 10,000 postal workers went on strike provoked by a government wage cut. The
reaction of the government was all too predictable as the army were sent in to break the
strike, with armed guards threatening strikers on picket lines.
The rural poor were also an early victim of Cumann na nGaedhael in power. Hoping to
cultivate a support base with larger farmers in Ireland, they supported these farmers in
their ongoing attempts to drive down the wages of landless agricultural labourers. These
labourers formed around 23% of the rural workforce. As a class they had been the big
losers during the land war of the 1880âs as they could not benefit from reforms that
allowed farmers buy land given they had none. Their attempts to gain a stake in Irish
rural society through organising themselves in the ITGWU (The Irish Transport and General
Workers Union) in the early 20th century was fiercely resisted by farmers.
In 1923 farmers, emboldened by the knowledge that the Free State would support them,
locked out thousands of unionised labourers in attempts to drive down wages. In Athy, Co.
Kildare when farmers locked out 350 labourers the National Army arrested the ITGWU branch
secretary in the area. When a farmer was attacked and a threshing machine damaged 8 trade
unionists were arrested and held for 3 months without trial or charge.
Later in the year when 1500 labourers were locked out in Waterford the response was
similar. The state sent in 600 Soldiers and the entire of East Waterford was put under a
curfew between 11p.m. and 5:30 am. Meanwhile nothing was done to stop vigilantes organised
by farmers called âWhite Guardsâ attacking union organisers across the county. The
Farmers, backed by the state, emerged victorious and crushed the union.
This, accompanied by high unemployment, broke the power of organised rural labour. The
ITGWUâs membership halved in the following three years. This was reflected by the fact
that within 5 years days lost to strike action were reduced by 95%. In the absence of
Unions, the government clearly had no interest in their welfare and the labourers had no
one to argue their corner. This saw their living standards plummet. There was a 10% fall
in agricultural labourersâ wages between 1922 and 1926 and a further 10% in the following
5 years. These policies saw a whole section of the rural population â the labourers -
disappear through emigration, little wonder given their income had fallen by 20% between
1923 and 31.
The Urban Poor
If their despicable attitude toward the rural poor was devastating their ambivalence to
the urban poor proved fatal. The desperate living standards of the urban poor was the
greatest single social issue facing âThe Free Stateâ in 1923. The tenement population in
Dublin lived in crushing poverty. However instead of helping the poorest of the poor the
government focused on building houses for the middle classes, which saw the expansion of
the suburbs on the fringes of Dublin. Little was done to alleviate the conditions among
the urban poor in Dublin. Housing construction was largely privatised and thus little was
done to alleviate the desperate squalor in which people lived as they could never afford
Shockingly Dublin Corporation only built an average of 483 houses a year between 1923 and
1933. This led to the deterioration of housing conditions. In 1926, when a census was
conducted, over a third of the population of Dublin lived in housing conditions with an
average of 4 people per room. This disregard for overcrowding was worsened by their tax
approach. Appealing to the rich in society the Free State, short of money, unbelievably
reduced income tax from what was 27% to 15% and instead turned to levying finances
indirectly, which had a greater impact on the poor. The outcome of theses policies was
revealed in 1926 when the shocking statistic of an infant mortality rate of 12% among
children younger than one in urban areas was revealed. The authoritarian, callous attitude
of Free State politicians and their indifference would allow this to continue unaddressed
with its devastating consequences.
By the mid 20âs Cumann na nGaedheal had eliminated all organised political opposition.
This had begun in their vicious conflict with their former comrades in the republican
movement but was expanded to wider opposition once torture and repression had broken the
Anti-treatyites. The labour movement had next faced similar annihilation by ferocious
attacks which in turn exposed the entire working class to direct attack. Satisfied at
having suppressed all economic radicalism, from the mid 1920âs they would increasingly
focus on social issues and far from resting on their laurels the Cumann na nGaedhael
Government would go on to enforce its narrow catholic doctrines on women in a conflict
that would have some of the furthest reaching consequences for Irish society. This will be
covered in the next issue of IAR.
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-Infos Information Center