A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Trk�_ _The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Trk�_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours | of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Britain, Cardiff Anarchist Network - South Wales Anarchists say 'Kill the Mosquito!'

Date Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:14:36 +0200



If you're under 25, there's a good chance you've have your ears pierced...by the Mosquito, a nasty
device that emits a very loud, high-pitched noise. Howard Stapleton, the inventor, has made an even
louder model and a cute version for the child-hating homeowner. Stapleton's company Compound
Security Systems Ltd is based in Merthyr Tydfil, South Wales. ---- KILL THE MOSQUITO! ---- Compound
Security Systems Ltd (CSS) is, once more, making the news for all the wrong reasons. For those of
you who haven’t heard of it, the Merthyr-based outfit manufactures the Mosquito, a device emitting
a very loud, high-pitched noise designed to “deter youths from congregating” according to the
company website. And it works. Young people find the noise unbearable and degrading. “It [the
Mosquito] makes us feel like second-class citizens”, said one.

Since production began in 2006, 6,000 of the devices (costing £500 each) have been bought by local
authorities and, not surprisingly, police forces around the UK in attempts to make life even worse
for our young people.

Quite rightly, this modern-day instrument of torture has attracted scathing criticism from
children’s organisations and Liberty, the human rights watchdog. “Imagine the outcry if a device
was introduced that caused blanket discomfort to people of one race or gender, rather than to our
kids”, said Liberty. Kathleen Marshall, the children’s commissioner for Scotland said: “such
indiscriminate targeting would not be tolerated against any other section of society”. Al
Aynsley-Green, the children’s commissioner for England described the use of the Mosquito as
“demonising children and young people.” Autistic children are particularly at risk, according to
Benet Middleton of the National Autistic Society. Keith Towler, the children’s commissioner for
Wales, has been much less outspoken, which shows a serious lack of judgement, given that the
Mosquito is manufactured in his patch.

The ‘Buzz Off’ campaign, which documents young people’s opposition to the device and their desire
to see it outlawed, is having some success. Mosquito sales are falling as local authorities find
themselves subject to increasing pressure to remove the contraptions from public places.

Yet CSS still hasn’t got the message. To counter falling profits, Howard Stapleton, the Mosquito’s
inventor, has just launched the Mini Mosquito, a half-price version for homeowners, even though
last year he promised he wouldn’t. The company is also flogging the “improved” mark 4 Mosquito,
which can emit an ear-splitting 108 decibels (dB), way above World Health Organisation
recommendations that outdoor noise levels should not exceed 55 dB. Clearly Mr Stapleton doesn’t
care about the potential damage to children’s hearing, even, presumably, that of his own five children!

So why isn’t the Mosquito banned?

Perhaps the campaigners haven’t paid enough attention to the impressive list of documents on the
company website “all of which have been compiled and written by independent third parties” we’re
told. Had the commissioners taken a close look at the evidence, they would have understood that,
rather than supporting the company’s official claim that the Mosquito is completely harmless, the
reports highlight serious health risks and express grave reservations about its usage.

At the top of the list is an Acoustic Test Report carried out in April 2006 by David Taylor,
clinical scientist and radiation protection adviser of the Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, for
North Staffordshire Police. Mr Taylor reports that his 23 year-old female “guinea pig” found the
tone “disagreeable” and that it was “not possible to state categorically that supersonic components
are irrelevant to any possible hazards associated with the Mosquito, since there may be effects on
human hearing at lower frequencies which are unknown”. Subsequent pages of the report have been
deliberately omitted, which hardly makes for a ringing endorsement. Let’s not forget, either, that
Mr Taylor was reporting on a version of the Mosquito which emitted a maximum of 89 dB, 20 less than
the new Mark 4.

Next is an unsigned draft report carried out by the Applied Environmental Research Centre Ltd
(AERC) and commissioned by CSS in 2006 so not independent at all. Mr Stapleton considers the report
so crucial that he’s listed it twice. Whoops! Here’s what paragraph 3.4.1 of the report says
(twice): “Exposure to constant or very loud noise - either occupational (above 80 dB) or
leisure-associated - can cause temporary or permanent hearing damage.” The report’s unknown author
also suggests that existing legislation, such as the Noise Act 1996, isn’t applicable to the
Mosquito, but insists that: “specialist legal advice is sought regarding the conclusions drawn from
this assessment”. So they’re not sure of its legality.

Likewise, another CSS-commissioned report carried out by the Institute of Sound and Vibration
Research (ISVR) at the University of Southampton admits that “It seems possible that the worst-case
Mosquito signal 16.8KHz at 89 dB might produce some subjective effect in sensitive individuals”. We
wonder what the institute would say about increasing the volume to 108 dB?

Other documents, such as the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Advocacy Report and one
by the Belgian Superior Health Council turn out to be worthless summaries written by person(s) unknown.

Those who are still convinced, however, that the Mosquito can make the world a better place will
take comfort from the findings of a third party report “analysing the use of high frequency sound
and its impact on human hearing”. Compiled in July 2007, this document concludes unequivocally that
“there is no danger to hearing from exposure to the Mosquito device“. And the author? A certain
Simon Morris who just happens to be one of the directors of…Compound Security Systems Ltd!

Cardiff Anarchist Network
- e-mail: cardiffanarchists@riseup.net
- Homepage: http://www.southwalesanarchists.org
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://ainfos.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en


A-Infos Information Center