|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours
Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) France, Alternative Libertair #221 - Sociology: The new proletarians Sarah Abdelnour, ed Textuel (fr) [machine translation]
Date
Sun, 09 Dec 2012 10:04:38 +0200
New Workers, published in the collection "small encyclopedia critical," aims to revisit
the notion of the proletariat today. Indeed, the dominant discour says that the working
class has long since disappeared, giving way to a huge middle class to which few escape
excluded quasi-residual (commuters, homeless, undocumented ...). In contrast to Sarah
Abelnour, talk proletariat has lost none of its relevance even if the composition of it
has evolved since the great economic restructuring 70s. ---- For starters, it tries to
give a precise definition of what the proletariat. In fact, the term has been so overused
over time we could get him to say everything and its opposite. For starters, the
proletariat does not exactly match the wage. The proletarian is characterized by the
failure to possess its labor force (roughly, his arms and skills).
This is not the case of some layers employees who benefit from access to land, a series of
consumer scoring a higher social status, credit, and certain forms of economic capital and
/ or cultural. The proletariat corresponds to unqualified employees who do not have the
means to benefit from the range of goods.
While the former proletariat was mainly composed of industrial workers, what about today?
If workers are obviously not disappeared as the dominant ideology would have us believe,
their share decreased popultion active. Six million in the '70s, they rose to 4.7 million
in 2011, while the population has increased in the meantime. They were joined by a cohort
of employees in the service sector, underpaid and exploited. In addition, the proletariat
has more women and immigrant-es before.
Finally, another element carectÃrise the "new proletariat" casualization. If before, most
of the workers had a more or less stable status, nowadays an increasing share of the
proletariat knows the experience of insecurity. We can understand it as a permanent
insecurity in relation to its economic status, resulting in vulnerability to employers and
difficulty in projecting the future in economic terms. If the proletariat as a whole is
not fragile, it is nevertheless a growing share of the latter that becomes.
To conclude, the book draws the outline of a proletariat which, far from disappearing, is
well developed. It includes both employee-es of industry than in services, increasing tank
operated countless es.
If the book paints a very end of the proletariat, we can nevertheless regrettable that
does not articulate enough sociological analysis and framework for action, while still
providing an overview searched and relevant on an issue more topical than ever .
Matthijs (AL Montpellier)
Sarah Abdelnour, the new proletariat, "Little Encyclopedia critical" Textuel, 2011
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://ainfos.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center