Mumia defense fights to air new evidence (fwd)

marta rodriguez (
Sat, 21 Sep 1996 01:24:20 -0400 (EDT)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 19:55:48 -0400 EDT
From: Workers World <>
To: Workers World Service <>
Subject: Mumia defense fights to air new evidence

Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the Sept. 26, 1996
issue of Workers World newspaper


By Andy McInerney

Faced with important new testimony in Mumia Abu-Jamal's
favor, on Sept. 4 the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ordered
that the new evidence must be heard by the Philadelphia
Common Pleas Court.

In 1982, Abu-Jamal was convicted and sentenced to death
for killing a police officer after a trial that his
supporters charge was rigged against him.

In June 1995 Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge signed Abu-
Jamal's death warrant. But after a mass defense campaign
Abu-Jamal was granted a stay of execution.

His legal team then petitioned for a new trial. Judge
Albert Sabo--who had presided over Abu-Jamal's original
trial--refused to grant that request.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is now considering Abu-
Jamal's appeals.

The new testimony is a recantation by Veronica Jones. The
defense had called Jones in the original trial as a witness
to seeing two men flee the scene of the shooting. But she
changed her story on the stand and identified Abu-Jamal as
the shooter.

She now claims, in a sworn deposition, that Philadelphia
detectives visited her in jail--where she was facing felony
charges--and "told me that if I would testify against Jamal
and identify Jamal as the shooter, I wouldn't have to worry
about my pending felony charges."

That statement confirms defense claims that Philadelphia
police coerced witnesses to finger Abu-Jamal as the shooter.
Abu-Jamal is a former Black Panther who exposed police
racism and brutality as a radio journalist.

The Supreme Court ordered that the new testimony be heard
on Sept. 18 to decide whether it merits a new post-
conviction-relief hearing. However, the testimony will be
heard by none other than Sabo, known as the "hanging judge"
for having sentenced more people to death than any other
judge in the country.

Sabo has made no secret of either his hatred for Abu-Jamal
or his pro-cop sympathies.

Further, the courts have denied Abu-Jamal's right to be at
the court when the testimony is presented.

Abu-Jamal's supporters have never expected justice by the
grace of the courts. They are mobilizing to make a strong
showing at the Sept. 18 hearing.

Activists are also gearing up for a Dec. 9 mass
demonstration on Wall Street in New York to mark the 15th
anniversary of Abu-Jamal's arrest.

- END -

(Copyright Workers World Service: Permission to reprint
granted if source is cited. For more information contact
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail: For subscription info send message to: Web: