A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage)
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours
Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) black rose fed: SENZALA OR QUILOMBO: REFLECTIONS ON APOC AND THE FATE OF BLACK ANARCHISM
Fri, 1 Jun 2018 09:08:01 +0300
"Sezala or Quilombo" was in it's time a scathing indictment against certain quarters of
criticism inside the wider US anarchist movement around the formation of Anarchist People
of Color (APOC). First began as a website and list serve that linked various
self-identified anarchists of color, the effort blossomed into a 2003 conference in
Detroit and was followed up by regional and national conferences and attempts to form
local group in some parts of the country. At the time of the writing of this piece in 2005
Pedro Ribeiro was a member of the Furious Five Revolutionary Collective in San Jose, CA
which later merged into the California based Amanecer. This piece was published as part of
the Black Anarchism reader. ---- By Pedro Ribeiro
In years past, when the slavery of the children of Africa was carried out by chain and
whip instead of uniforms and patrol cars, black people in Brazil had only two places where
they could be - in the Senzala or the Quilombo. The Senzala was a small hut placed outside
the master's house, a shack in which the slaves would stay from after sunset to before
sunrise, chained to the walls and behind locked doors. The Senzala was their home; there
they raised their children and grew old. In secret, they practiced their language,
religion and culture away from white eyes. The window of the senzala would always face the
main quad of the plantation where a single post could be seen emerging from the earth's
belly. The Pelourinho - the mast in which rebellious slaves were tortured into submission
or death, whichever came first. This was the Senzala.
But, every once in a while, a laborious and dedicated group of slaves would defect from
the generosity of the slave master's whips and chains and senzalas, and go into the
jungle. They would run, day after night after day after night, into the mata, deeper into
the forest; away from the treacherous Capitão do mato, the black or mulatos overseers
responsible for capturing escaped slaves. In the jungle, they looked for hope. In the
jungle, they looked for freedom. In the jungle, away from the white man, they looked for
Quilombos were city-states created in the heart of the mata by escaped slaves. The most
famous - the largest and the one whose name was whispered in secret in the dark by those
in search of freedom - that was Palmares. Palmares had a estimated population of twenty to
thirty thousand, structured in eleven different villages. In Palmares, as in other
Quilombos escaped slaves held the majority. Natives and poor whites were also accepted
into the Quilombo, with and shared the same rights and duties as anyone else. Decisions
were made by village assemblies, in which every adult, man or woman, of every race, could
(and most would) participate.
No, Palmares was no utopia. It was no communist society in which the decisions where as
horizontal as possible and in which all were seen as equal. Palmares had chiefs, one for
each village. The chief of the capital, Macacos, was the king of Palmares. But this is
neither here nor now. The now is the quilombo as opposed to the senzala.
Palmares died in flames. It fought until the last person was dead. It had been fighting
for its sovereignty and independence for over one hundred years. It gave its blood to
defend what it cherished most - its freedom and its self-determination.
Whatever drove the Palmarinos to fight is what I am interested in talking about. A friend
of mine said something that struck a chord in me. He said: "People are always talking
about dying for this or that. You gotta die for the cause if you are militant enough, if
you are really bad ass you should die for your beliefs. But nobody asks, what are you
living for? Not dying, but living - what is your life for?"
The Palmarinos were living for something. They were living for their freedom and their
collective autonomy. They were living for their right of self-determination, to do away
with the chains that held them slaves in the past and to decide by themselves the path of
their life. If they died fighting for that, they died for what they were living for. They
died the death of free people.
We now call ourselves Anarchists. We say we want the end of all chains and the
extermination of all oppression. Yet, in the Anarchist "movement", black folk and other
folks of color are still in the senzala. We are still having to disguise ourselves, call
whitey "Massa" and chain ourselves to the wall. No, don't talk about racism unless is in
that very abstract sense of
racism. While there might be nobody yelling "die, nigger, die!*", you can hear a very
clear "shut the fuck up, nigger, just shut the fuck up."
We pretend that racism is just a minor problem, something that, like the Leninist State,
will wither away if we will it to. The intrinsic racist characteristics that infect
Anarchism, specially North-American Anarchism, cannot be questioned without one being seen
as some kind of authoritarian nationalist, or even worse, a Maoist. Red-baiting, of all
Like in the real senzala, our resistance to racism needs to be covert. It needs to be
hidden and made like it is something else. It cannot be what it needs to be, it cannot do
what needs to be done, or the senzala would break apart and the master's house would be
set aflame. No. Like capoeira, our fight against white supremacy inside North American
anarchism needs to disguise itself as a dance in order to become a martial art.
And you know how the rap goes: if we talk about empowerment we are power hungry. If we
assert our self-determination, we are authoritarian nationalists. When we expose how white
Anarchism is, elitist white Anarchists generally come with excuses like "Hey, I saw a
black anarchist once!" or the classic, "well, we need to outreach to communities of color."
Let me tell you something, the reason why the masses are not flooding to your Anarchism is
exactly that one - it is your Anarchism. It is a white, petty-bourgeois Anarchism that
cannot relate to the people. As a Black person, I am not interested in your Anarchism. I
am not interested in individualistic, self-serving, selfish liberation for you and your
white friends. What I care about is the liberation of my people. The collective liberation
of the children of the African Diaspora, those that have been beaten down and treated
worse than dogs all across the world.
So, no, we are not interested in your anarchism. We need to create our own. Understand
this, if the whites in Palmares were allies and died with the blacks and the natives it is
not because they invited the blacks and the natives into their structure, into their
society and said unto them: "We are all equal." It was because the blacks and the natives
created their own structure - their own society - in which power relations were different
so that whites could not longer by the sheer force of their privilege impose their view of
how the society should be run. To try and integrate people of color in your society or
your movement, like there would be no culture clash and no confrontation - it is naive,
senseless and can lead nowhere but into deception.
In the senzala of contemporary Anarchist theory and practice, the only place for Blacks
and other folks of color is the chain in the wall or the Pelourinho. To question the
structure of this "movement", why is it really composed mainly of white suburban boys, is
a invitation to the Pelourinho - or to the Quilombo.
Some escaped slaves decided to create their own Quilombo in the forest of North America,
and they called it APOC (Anarchist People Of Color). APOC was a necessary step on the
beginning of the self-determination of people of color inside the movement. This
self-determination we seek is to analyze the problems of race inside and outside the
movement in our own perspective. To create our own analysis of authority and what it means
for us to be Anarchists. What does it mean for those that have always felt odd at an
Anarchist event while looking around and thinking are they made the wrong turn somewhere
and ended up in a white only area of segregated Mississippi.
When an anarchist tells me about how the cops are fascist pigs, I stop for a second and
think. A lot of times I'll of some experience in a protest against this or that corporate
meeting or something, in which the cops tear gassed the crowd and whoop some ass and I
think, man, you got it easy. I remember in my neighborhood in Brazil, where if you got
only an ass-whooping, you would consider yourself lucky. I remember the day they shot my
uncle dead. I remember this one cop that used to follow me around and scare the life out
of me because I thought he was going to cap me and there no way in hell I was approaching
no authorities to complain because then I would surely wind up dead. I remember the police
invading my grandma's house, guns in hand, while my cousin was still a baby and was
sleeping in my aunt's bed. Even here, in my neighborhood in East Palo Alto, you can always
hear the cops fussing around at night and you know they are not looking for no black-bloc
kid from some protest or another. So tell me again how the cops are fascists...
The fact is, we know oppression. We live it, we experience it. In one form or another, one
extreme or another. We do not conceptualize it. We do not sit down and intellectualize
about pain because our people have been hunted down and shot, and burned and beaten and we
lost the need to understand pain philosophically when we learned it physically.
So why are the people not filling the ranks of the Anarchist movement? What it is that
prevents those people of color that have been feeling the brunt of police brutality, and
have been living off the scraps of what capitalism leaves behind, why have they not joined
The answer is simple: because is not their movement. It can never be their movement while
it is being created by and for white middle-class kids with a Jesus complex who think they
can save the world (or the ones with Buddha complex who think they can get wet by talking
about water). You cannot hustle the movement and you cannot hustle the people. Revolution
is not a game in which you can pretend to listen to the voice of the people of color only
when is convenient and shut them off when they start questioning your privilege.
APOC, as any revolutionary step, spurned an immediate reaction, a counter-revolutionary
step. The amount of voices in the Anarchist "movement" that have been raised to criticize,
put down or, in any other form, discredit APOC (most, if not all of them, white, by the
way) have been, if small, consistent and bold. To incur and cite these criticisms is
irrelevant to today's discussion. I am not here to defend APOC. I am here to talk about
why I don't need to do it.
APOC is our Quilombo. Our keep, our fortress, where we can meet as people from oppressed
background and not only share our experiences and how they are relevant to each other, but
also how they are relevant in the larger scheme of things. APOC is more than a safe zone
for people to feel good about not being in a room without white folk, but is a conscious
project of self-determination for people of color. It is a step closer to our freedom as a
people and the materialization of the idea that community comes from something in common,
something we can share.
No, APOC is no utopia. It is not even close. But that is neither here nor now. We may
stumble, we may fall, we may even break our heads wide open. But at least we are walking
on our own two feet.
It is pointless for me to try and convince white Anarchists of the need for APOC because
white anarchists have not experienced what we a people of color have experienced. It is
like trying to convince my boss of the need for Socialism - a more often than not
And while there are white Anarchists out there who remember that only the oppressed can
liberate themselves and the end of white supremacy cannot be brought about by white people
- there are those that, in their arrogance and short sightedness, will not yield and
cannot tolerate the thought that maybe there is something that Anarchist people of color
need to discuss that does not include white people.
And if, for a moment, I thought that APOC needed to be approved by the white anarchist
scene that would be the moment in which APOC would lose its appeal to me. Because is not
about being accepted, being cherished, being "on the good side" with the white Anarchists
- that is the Senzala. It is about self-determination and it is about resistance. It is
about creating our own culture, our own analysis and dictating our own future. APOC for me
is not about seeking a way to make white people love us, or hate us.
I have to tell you a secret about APOC: it is not about white people at all. It is not,
and it should not be ever. I am tired of talking about white people, thinking of white
people, analyzing white people and worrying about white people. I want to know what I have
in common with my Korean sister and my Guatemalan brother. I want to know about the great
struggles for liberation in Uganda and how the Filipino resisted imperialism. What can we
learn from each other as people of color? What does my bairro in Rio de Janeiro has in
common with a Latino barrio in East Side San Jose?
This is something I wrote for my sisters and brothers at APOC. We need to understand
ourselves in order to understand the world around us and be able to fight and destroy the
bourgeois plague which eating away our homes, our lives and our cultures.
As a black person, my anarchism is Black Anarchism. As a member of the exploited class, my
anarchism is Class-Struggle Anarchism. As a person who wishes for a better future, my
anarchism is Anarchist-Communism.
Vamos a ela, porque temos muito, muito para construir.
Não tá morto que peleia!
Viva a Anarquia!
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-Infos Information Center