A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage)
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours
Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) US, black rose fed: Lorenzo Komboa Ervin: Why I Am An Anarchist
Sat, 10 Jun 2017 10:26:56 +0300
Lorenzo Komboa Ervin is a former member of the Black Panther Party and wrote the seminal
text "Anarchism and the Black Revolution" while incarcerated as a political prisoner. This
is an excerpt from the sections "Why I Became and Anarchist" and "What I Believe" and the
full text can be found in Black Anarchism: A Reader published by Black Rose/Rosa Negra
Anarchist Federation. ---- By Lorenzo Komboa Ervin ---- In the 1960s I was part of a
number of Black revolutionary movements, including the Black Panther Party, which I feel
partially failed because of the authoritarian leadership style of Huey P. Newton, Bobby
Seale and others on the Central Committee. This is not a recrimination against those
individuals, but many errors were made because the national leadership was too divorced
from the chapters in cities all over the country, and therefore engaged in "commandism" or
forced work dictated by leaders. But many contradictions were also set up because of the
structure of the organization as a Marxist-Leninist group. There was not a lot of
inner-party democracy, and when contradictions came up, it was the leaders who decided on
their resolution, not the members. Purges became commonplace, and many good people were
expelled from the group simply because they disagreed with the leadership.
Because of the over-importance of central leadership, the national organisation was
ultimately liquidated entirely, packed up and shipped back to Oakland, California. Of
course, many errors were made because the BPP was a young organisation and was under
intense attack by the state. I do not want to imply that the internal errors were the
primary contradictions that destroyed the BPP. The police attacks on it did that, but, if
it were better and more democratically organised, it may have weathered the storm. So this
is no mindless criticism or backstabbing attack. I loved the party. And, anyway, not
myself or anyone else who critique the party with hindsight, will ever take away from the
tremendous role that the BPP played in the Black Liberation movement of the 1960s. But we
must look at a full picture of out organisations from that period, so that we do not
repeat the same errors.
I think my brief period in the Panthers was very important because it taught me about the
limits of - and even the bankruptcy of - leadership in a revolutionary movement. It was
not a question of a personality defect on behalf of particular leader, but rather a
realisation that many times leaders have one agenda, followers have another.
I also learned this lesson during my association with the African People's Socialist Party
during the 1980s. When I had gotten out of the joint I had met Omali Yeshitela while I was
confined in Leavenworth (KS.) federal pen, when he was invited to our annual Black
Solidarity Bay festivities in 1979. This association continued when they formed the Black
prisoners' organisation, the African National Prison Organisation shortly thereafter. ANPO
was definitely a good support organisation, and along with News and Letters Committees the
Kentucky branch of the National Alliance Against Racism and Political Repression, and the
Social revolutionary Anarchist Federation (now defunct), they wrote letters and made phone
calls to have me hospitalised after I had been infected with Tuberculosis, which saved my
life. But the group folded when the proposed coalition of founding organisations collapsed
due to sectarianism
After I got out of prison, I lost contact with them as they had moved from Louisville to
the West Coast. It was not until 1987 that I once again contacted them when we were having
a mass demonstration against police brutality in my hometown. They were invited and came
to the demo, along with ANPO and several left-wing forces, and for two years off and on, I
had an association with them. But I felt APSP politically was always an authoritarian
organisation, and even though was never a member, I became more and more uncomfortable
with their organisational policies In the Summer Of 1988, I went to Oakland, California to
attend an "organisers' school"?, but I also wanted to satisfy myself about the internal
workings of the group. For six weeks, I worked with them out of their national
headquarters in the local community. I was able to determine for myself about internal
matters and also abort the politics of the group itself. I found out that about a whole
history of purges, factional fights, and the "one man" dictatorial leadership style of the
Party. While in Oakland, I was asked to attend a meeting in Philadelphia that Fall to
I attended the Philly meeting, but was very concerned when I was automatically placed as
part of a "slate"? to be officers of the ANPO group, without any real democratic
discussion among the proposed membership, or allowing others to put themselves forward as
potential candidates. I was in fact made the highest-ranking officer in the group.
Although I still believe that there should be a mass political prisoners' movement and
especially a Black prisoners' movement, I became convinced that this was not it. I believe
that it will take a true coalition of forces in the Black and progressive movements to
build a mass base of support. I got to feeling that these folks just wanted to push the
party and its politics, rather than free prisoners, and so I just dropped out and haven't
dealt with them since. I was very disillusioned and depressed when I learned the truth. I
won't be used by anybody - not for long.
The early stages of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee was a contrast in many
ways to any Black freedom group to come before or after. Part of the SNCC activists were
middle class college intellectuals, with a small number of working class grassroots
activists, but they developed a working style that was very anti-authoritarian and was
unique to the Civil rights movement. Instead of bringing in a national leader to lead
local struggles, like Dr, Martin Luther King Jr. and his group, the Southern Christian
Leadership Council, was wont to do, SNCC sent in field organisers to work with the local
people and develop indigenous leadership and help organise, but not take over local
struggles. They placed their faith in the ability of the people to determine an agenda
which would best serve them and lead themselves to obtain their goals rather than being
inspired or told what to do by a leader SNCC itself had no strong leaders, even though it
had persons in decision-making authority, but they were accountable to membership boards
and the community in a way no other group in the civil rights movement was.
SNCC was also a secular organisation, in contrast to SCLC, which was formed by Black
preachers and had co-opted their style of organising from the Black church, with a
religious authority figure who gave orders to the troops. Today most political
commentators or historians still do not want to give full credit to the effectiveness of
SNCC, but many of the most powerful and successful struggles of the Civil rights movement
were initiated and won by SNCC, including most of the voting rights struggles and the
Mississippi phase of the freedom movement. I learned a lot about internal democracy by
being a part of SNCC, how it could make or break an organisation, and how it had so much
to do with the morale of the members. Everyone was given an opportunity to participate in
decision-making, and felt part of a great historical mission, which would change their
lives forever. They were right. Even though SNCC gave some lifelong lessons to all of us
involved, even if it was destroyed by the rich and their own, who resorted to an
authoritarian style in later years.
I also began to have a rethinking process after I was forced to leave de U.S. and go to
Cuba, Czechoslovakia and other countries in the "Socialist bloc"?, as it was called then.
It was clear that these countries were essentially police states, even though they had
brought many significant reforms and material advances to their peoples over what had
existed before. I observed also that racism existed in those countries, along with the
denial of basic democratic rights and poverty on a scale I would not have thought
possible. I also saw a great deal of corruption by the Communist Party leaders and State
administrators, who were well off, while the workers were mere wage slaves. I thought to
myself, "there has to be a better way!". There is. It is Anarchism, which I started to
read about when I was captured in East Germany and had heard more about when I was
eventually thrown into prison in the United States.
Prison is a place where one continually thinks about his other past life, including the
examination of new or contrary ideas, I began to think about what I had seen in the Black
movement, along with my mistreatment in Cuba, my capture and escape in Czechoslovakia, and
my final capture in East Germany. I replayed all this over and over in my head. I was
first introduced to Anarchism in 1969, immediately after I was brought back to the U.S.
and was placed in the federal lockup in New York City, where I met Martin Sostre. Sostre
told me about how to survive in prison, the importance of fighting for prisoners'
democratic rights, and about Anarchism. This short course in Anarchism did not stick
however, even though I greatly respected Sostre personally, because I did not understand
the theoretical concepts.
Finally around 1973, after I had been locked up for about three years, I started receiving
Anarchist literature and correspondence from Anarchists who had heard about my case. This
began my slow metamorphosis to a confirmed Anarchist, and in fact it was not until a few
years later that I came over. During the late 1970s, I was adopted by Anarchist Black
Cross-England and also by a Dutch Anarchist group called HAPOTOC (Help A Prisoner Oppose
Torture Organising Committee) which organised an instrumental defence campaign. This
proved crucial in ultimately getting people all over the world to write the U. S.
government to demand my release.
I wrote a succession of articles for the Anarchist press, and was a member of the Social
Revolutionary Anarchist Federation, the IWW, and a number of other Anarchist groups in the
U.S. and around the world. But I became disheartened by the Anarchist movement's failure
to fight white supremacy and its lack of class struggle politics. So, in 1979, I wrote a
pamphlet called Anarchism and the Black Revolution, to act as a guide to the discussion of
these matters by our movement. Finally, in 1983, I was released from prison, after having
served almost 15 years.
For all these years, the pamphlet influenced a number of Anarchists who were opposed to
racism and also wanted a more class struggle-oriented approach than the movement then
afforded. Meanwhile I had fallen away from the Anarchist movement in disgust, and it was
not until 1992 when I was working in my hometown of Chattanooga, Tennessee, as an
anti-racist community organiser, that I ran into an Anarchist named John Johnson and once
again made contact. He gave me an issue of Love and Rage newspaper, and as a result, I
contacted Chris Day of Love and Rage, and comrades in WSA in New York. The rest, as they
say, is history. I have been back with a vengeance ever since.
All of a sudden, I see there are now others in the movement who understand the workings of
white supremacy and they have encouraged me to rewrite this pamphlet I have gratefully
done so. Why am I an Anarchist? I have an alternative vision for the revolutionary
process. There is a better way. Let us get on with it!
What I Believe
All anarchists do not believe in the same things. There are differences and the field is
broad enough that those differences can coexist and be respected. So I don't know what
others believe, I just know what I believe in and I will spell out it simply, but thoroughly.
I believe in Black liberation, so I am a Black revolutionary. I believe that Black people
are oppressed both as workers and a distinct nationality, and will only be freed by a
Black revolution, which is an intrinsic part of a Social revolution. I believe that Blacks
and other oppressed nationalities must have their own agenda, distinct world-view, and
organisations of struggle, even though they may decide to work with white workers.
I believe in the destruction of the world Capitalist System, so I am an anti-imperialist.
As long as Capitalism is alive on the planet, there will be exploitation, oppression and
nation-states. Capitalism is responsible for the major world wars, numerous brush wars,
and millions of people starving for the profit motive of the rich countries in the West.
I believe in racial justice, so I am an anti-racist. The Capitalist system was and is
maintained by enslavement and colonial oppression of the African people, and before there
will be a social revolution white supremacy must be defeated. I also believe that Africans
in America are colonised and exist as an internal colonial of the U.S, white mother
country. I believe that white workers must give up their privileged status, their "white
identity"?, and must support racially oppressed workers in their fights for equality and
national liberation. Freedom cannot be bought by enslaving and exploiting others.
I believe in social justice and economic equality, so I am a Libertarian Socialist. I
believe that society and all parties responsible for its production should share the
economic products of labour. I do not believe in Capitalism or the state, and believe they
both should be overthrown and abolished I accept the economic critique of Marxism, but not
its model for political organising. I accept the anti-authoritarian critique of Anarchism,
but not its rejection of the class struggle.
I believe in workers control of society and industry, so I am an Anarcho-Syndicalist.
Anarchist Syndicalism is revolutionary labour unionism, where direct action tactics are
used to fight Capitalism and take over industry I believe that the factory committees,
workers' councils and other labour organisations should be the workplaces, and should take
control from the Capitalists after a direct action campaign of sabotage, strikes,
sit-downs, factory occupations and other actions.
I do not believe in government, and so I am an Anarchist. I believe that government is one
of the worst forms of modem oppression, is the source of war and economic oppression, and
must be overthrown. Anarchism means that we will have more democracy, social equality, and
economic prosperity. I oppose all forms of oppression found in modem society: patriarchy,
white supremacy, Capitalism, State Communism, religious dictates, gay discrimination, etc.
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-Infos Information Center