A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Català_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Català_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours ||
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF | How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
{Info on A-Infos}
(en) France, Union Communiste Libertaire AL #298 - The right to abortion between gains and setbacks (fr, it, pt)[machine translation]
Date
Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:00:11 +0200
In September, on the occasion of the International Day of the Right to Abortion, the
question of voluntary interruption of pregnancy was put at the center of the debate. The
moment to take stock of the abortion abroad, this right constantly questioned and unequal
in its conditions of access. ---- Every year on 28 September, the International Day of the
Right to Abortion, is a new opportunity for women around the world to demonstrate for this
fundamental right to dispose of their bodies. The attacks of anti-choice are multiplying
everywhere, including where abortion seemed definitively acquired. The right to abortion
is not just a feminist issue, it is also a matter of class for the poorest women who can
not afford to go abroad or to private clinics.
A disparate international situation
In the world, only about fifty countries allow abortion, without condition to fulfill
(except legal deadlines). For other countries, the situation ranges from total prohibition
to extremely restrictive legislation (in case of rape, danger to the health of women or
fetal malformation).
Since the beginning of the year, in the United States, no less than 300 laws have been
passed by the states. Among the most prominent are Alabama (where doctors performing
abortions are up to 99 years in prison, except in cases of life-threatening maternal
urgency or " lethal abnormality " of the fetus). Georgia, which now prohibits women from
having an abortion beyond the sixth week of pregnancy. The arrival of Trump in power is
not for nothing in these offensives. The US president has appointed many conservative
judges in federal appeal courts to end anti-abortion laws. Their clear objective: to seize
the Supreme Court and to question the 1973 decision ( Roe vs Wade ) authorizing the abortion.
In Latin America, very few countries allow abortion, and many demonstrations of women
claim this right. They are particularly massive in Chile and Argentina. In the latter
country, things are progressing (a decriminalization law has almost been passed in 2018)
and it seems that it is only a matter of time in this conservative country and homeland of
the Pope, who recently compared abortion to a mass murder. In Asia, the picture is a
little more contrasted. Reversal of the situation in South Korea which prohibited since
1953 the abortion except in case of rape or incest. The Constitutional Court of South
Korea invalidated last April the law penalizing voluntary abortions in force for more than
65 years. In North Korea, India, China, Nepal, Viet Nam and Taiwan,
In Africa, legislation can also be very different from one country to another, but with a
majority of states totally or partially prohibiting abortion. However, the misuse of
certain drugs (which cause miscarriages) allows Latin American women in particular, but
also Asian, to have access to a more secure abortion despite the prohibitions.
A Europe moving forward but ...
The situation seems more favorable for European women. Thus Irish women now have the right
to abort (following the referendum of 2018 which saw the "yes " Two-thirds), as well as
the Cypriots. Nevertheless, abortion is still prohibited in Malta, Monaco and Andorra. In
Monaco, the injunction contradictory with the announcement of the government last August
that says that the principality will soon be ready to decriminalize abortion but without
allowing it. Monegasque women who had been facing a prison sentence of six months to three
years and a fine of 9,000 to 18,000 euros could go abroad to abort. As for Poland or
Hungary, they are regularly on the point of completely banning this right. As in Spain a
few years ago, it is the women's struggle that is pushing back reactionary governments.
But until when? Especially since European MPs are unable to agree to have abortion
included in the Constitution as a fundamental right.
For even in countries where it is legalized, abortion is often a path of combatants for
those who would like to resort to it: lack of local structures, clause of conscience of
the doctors, not taken in financial charge by the States, making them run the risk of
ending up in outdated deadlines and no longer being able to abort according to the
country's legislation.
Debate restarted in France
Recently, as part of the Health Bill, an amendment proposing longer delays (from 14 to 16
weeks of amenorrhea) was adopted by the Senate, before being put again to the vote (with
the approval from the Government) and rejected. This episode has revived the debate in
France, where deadlines have not changed since 2001. Certainly there have been some
progress (deletion of the reflection period for the majors, supported 100% by the social
security, possibility of abort out of hospital). However, all women can not abort in
France: this is the case of those who discover their pregnancy beyond the twelfth week or
who have not found a solution before this time. In this case, the only recourse is to go
abroad (generally in Spain or the Netherlands, where the delays are much longer). But this
solution has a cost (800 to 2000 € intervention) that only those who can afford it can
afford. Exit therefore women in situations of precariousness (RSA, stay-at-home mothers,
in an irregular situation ...) or victims of domestic violence who have a hard time
justifying an absence of at least two days.
A fundamental right to defend
Whether legal or not, abortion has always been and is practiced all over the world. Each
year, more than 50 million abortions take place, nearly 50% of which are insecure, with
all the risks that this entails for women's health (risks of infections, bleeding,
sterility), even on their lives (as was the case in France before 1975 and legalization).
For if those who can afford to abort in expensive private clinics (even in countries where
abortion is prohibited or severely restricted), the others find ways to abort anyway at
their own risk. Thus, it is estimated that about 10% of maternal deaths can be attributed
each year to unsafe abortions.
In countries that allow abortion, the battle is now around the resources allocated (places
for abortion, doctors trained, financial support) but also on the delays to extend or even
eliminate - as is the case in Canada (see insert). Such a measure would allow women to
have abortions free of charge in their country of residence and eliminate inequalities of
access between women of different backgrounds. On the other hand, it is necessary to put
an end to the speeches that infantilize women, who would need laws to know when they can
or can not abort. Women know what is good for them, they do not need lawmakers deciding in
their place (and without any medical reason to come to support such or such delay) for
moral, religious or philosophical questions.
It is also a date of international solidarity between all women, whatever the legislation
of their country. Not one of us will be free until we all are free !
Canada, an example to follow ?
Since 1988, abortion has been decriminalized in Canada. It took many mobilizations and the
relentlessness of a doctor practicing abortions for the Supreme Court to break the law
prohibiting abortion. At the time, judges relied on section 7 of the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms, which guaranteed women's rights to "the life, liberty and security of
their person" to arrive at the conclusion that the abortion provision of the Criminal Code
conflicted. In 1989, the Supreme Court will rule that only one person has constitutional
rights and that these rights only begin at the moment of birth.
For 30 years, Canadian women can therefore abort, without delay and without being able to
oppose the primacy of the life of the embryo or the fetus on their will to interrupt a
pregnancy. However, the vast majority of abortions take place during the first trimester,
most often in early pregnancy. We are far from the images conveyed by the anti-choice of
women aborting a few days of the term of pregnancy !
In addition, a 2019 study in Quebec showed that the number of abortions had dropped by 21%
since 2003, with a historically low level of 2018. This decrease can be explained in part
by better access to contraception among young people (with a large increase in the use of
the IUD). These figures defeat the conventional wisdom that the lack of time would
increase the number of abortions. However, the difficulties persist in rural areas in
Canada where women sometimes have to travel thousands of kilometers to get to a clinic or
hospital.
Gaëlle (UCL Saint-Denis)
https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?Le-droit-a-l-IVG-entre-gains-et-reculs
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center