A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **

News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Català_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Català_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours || of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF | How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
{Info on A-Infos}

(en) Collectif Alternative Libertaire Bruxelles - Against media propaganda, refuse to howl with the wolves (fr, pt) [machine translation]

Date Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:44:17 +0200

Thursday, November 6, Brussels hosted a historic union demonstration which gathered more than 100,000 people against the austerity policies of the new government. Yet it was not until a few hours for the media and politicians about the show in heart condemning the clashes between protesters and police around the Gare du Midi. --- Hungry for sensational images, the media with the help of Christian De Coninck - spokesman for the Brussels police - have separated the wheat from the chaff, the good from the wicked thugs protesters. First cities, the port of Antwerp Dockers but it took a long time to manage that anarchists are also covered by the media and political opprobrium. ---- In fact, the conservative management had been rung several days earlier, especially in the writings of Francis Van De Woestyne (La Libre) or statements Jacqueline Galand (Minister MR mobility), where the right to strike, which was called into issue. We know this government is anti-union, it carries both a political and cultural war against the union rallies. Margaret Thatcher as in the 80s, he dreamed of limiting the right to strike or break any social movement.

Remember, between 84 and 85, the UK knows the most important since World War II social conflict: the miners' strike. Faced with the miners' struggle against the closure of coal mines, the Thatcher government decided to break union resistance to impose a new economic era: neo-liberalism.

To break the social movements, the technique is known and well established. Designate the bad protesters. So Thatcher made striking miners "enemies from within" and makes them shoot the repression of the state. The media, in their role as watchdog, present as undemocratic strikes and strikers like thugs. The police repression (militarized for the occasion) will be 20,000 wounded, 11,000 arrests and six minors will be murdered by the police! Justice, which is never neutral, make strikes illegal and decide on the dissolution of the National Union of Mine Workers.

This technique division protesters is probably as old as the emergence of social movements themselves. It will be applied during the "strike of the Century" against the 60-61 winter the only law of Gaston Eyskens. There are good protesters, Democrats and peaceful face and the bad, undemocratic thugs.

Against the propaganda, nobody wonders why workers-Artists come to use physical violence to express their discontent. As the British miners or Belgian workers 60s, Antwerp dockers fight against the destruction of their working conditions (already among the most dangerous!). Indeed, both the Dutch and French dockers, Belgian face the liberalization of port activity. Liberalization provides among other things the possibility for companies to stop using the statutory dockers but to untrained, under multiple precarious status as temporary with the key below 30% wage non-unionized workers!

The destruction of social gains and casualization is the lead government intends Charles Michel politics, gun of NV-A door. Moreover, Bart de Wever (the real head of the government) has mentioned in an interview that there is no alternative to the policy of the government. There is no alternative? This statement echoes the famous phrase attributed to Margaret Thatcher, "There is no alternative." In the eyes of Michel De Wever and as the eyes of Thatcher 35 years ago, there is no alternative to capitalism, neoliberal reforms, austerity that kills worker-Artists, unravels our acquired Social and always pushes us further into poverty. This is a reminder that violence against workers Artists-we occupied the seat November 6 FEB (Federation of Enterprises in Belgium) whose collusion with the government are known.

But as rightly said Bertolt Brecht, "a river carrying everything they say it is violent, but never said anything about the violence which enclose the banks." Because violence is the government which leads (just go for a ride in Antwerp NV-A doing both racist and ultra-security policies to realize). Faced with austerity measures planned by the new government, facing growing repression, physical, moral and human violence, as against the refusal to hear the social movements ( as De Wever said there no alternative to government policy ) we can only understand the growing discontent and the use of violence by protesters!

Retort is that we live in a democracy? But there he was to still believe this blatant lie? From the moment the so-called democratic laws are made by the same people who defend the bosses and the rich, who can still believe that these laws forbid the people? The laws do not help those they represent. Just see the impunity enjoyed by the police in many cases of police violence yet proven! The jails are full of poor people, because any violation of the order of the rich is wrong...

Operated by the government and media division aims to legitimize state violence but unacceptable social protest, she wants us to believe that if we walk in the nails we will be heard. Yet history shows that any social movement is made of protest, disobedience and violence. The struggle for the 8 hour working day, the struggle for social rights, radicalism is imposed by governments and states that refuse an egalitarian and democratic society.

In the aftermath of clashes between police and protesters, this division has taken a different form. Because politicians and the media fear that protesters identify with these events, they argue that the extreme right was present in this event. While it is true that right-wing extremists were identified as Pascal Cornet was a member of the neo-Nazi splinter group Nation, it was driven by anti-fascist activists. One of our comrades and anarchist militant photographer also been a victim of physical assault for racist reasons and two members of the Autonomous Nationalists Dutch were also spotted. If racist acts are unacceptable, however, it is absurd to assume that the presence of some hidden fascists can influence or infiltrate thousands of demonstrators. Indeed, if we follow this logic, the latest manifestation of GAIA was a fascist demonstration since Nation was present and visible!

For Antwerp dockers, as with many social conflicts, the extreme right is trying to infiltrate struggles to enjoy the discontent of workers-Artists. It was as if Vlaams Belang port of Antwerp. If their populist and racist speech can influence some workers-Artists, this is not the case for the majority of them are aware of their dual discour s (since the Vlaams Belang did nothing to oppose the liberalization of port activities desired by Europe as they sit there).

Antifascism media is about as credible as that of Onkelinx (PS) attacks ministers NV-A. It is they who by their policies and pro-austerity speech paved the way for populist and extreme right. After stating that the anarchists infiltrated the dockers, the media now say that racist acts of some dockers necessarily mean that they are fascists. Nothing is more false, as when some claim that they are actually undercover cops or other events that would be responsible for "agents provocateurs".

The terms "thugs", "anarchists" or other "agents provocateurs" are made to delegitimize an event of historic proportions but also to make illegitimate use of violence by the people. The aim is to promote the soft consensus and stifling the anger of the exploited-es. In sum, we are allowed to express our disagreement but according to the rules set by the dominant. Even those that require us their everyday violence. The media and politicians want us to believe that it is the violence of the demonstrators who discredits the event, then that is the same media and politicians long before these events had already condemned this event, in particular by making the door -words strike against bosses!

Today the state condemns the dockworkers hoping to divide the population. The state condemns them for acts of violence? The history of the British miners shows that if tomorrow the anti-union measures are passed, the state condemn the union for striking. And if we fall into this trap, one day the state will condemn us for simply expressing our discontent. And that day, we will all be considered thugs!
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://lists.ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en

A-Infos Information Center