A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **

News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Trk�_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Trk�
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours || of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF | How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
{Info on A-Infos}

(en) Britain, Newsletter of the anarchist Solidarity Federation Catalyst #18

Date Sun, 31 May 2009 18:58:40 +0300



Content ---- * The real cost of inflation * Dirty dealings at the LSE * Who we are.. * Can
I phone a friend? * Day of action against Starbucks * Know your rights: Trade Union
Membership * Cleaning up on the tube * Service not included * Education, Education,
Education * Making a killing ---- The real cost of inflation ---- If the government were
to announce that it was cutting the wages of all workers there would be uproar. Yet this
is exactly what they have done by calling for ‘pay restraint’ and capping all wage rises
at 2%. A below-inflation pay ‘rise’ is a pay cut. No amount of statistical trickery
changes this fact. ---- The government’s favoured measure of inflation, the Consumer Price
Index (CPI) is currently running around 3.3%. However, this excludes mortgage repayments.

Does that mean we don’t have to pay them back out of our falling wages? No such luck. The
inflation measure that does include these payments is called the Retail Price Index (RPI).
It is currently running at around 4.3%. So by the government’s own figures they are
imposing a pay cut of over 2%.

However, the official figures don’t tell the whole story. Inflation is calculated by
taking the average prices of a ‘typical basket of goods,’ including such items as bread
and butter, digital radios and flat screen TVs. However, if prices of essentials are
rising while prices of gadgets are falling – which they are, we simply spend more on
essentials and less on luxuries, and our standard of living falls even though overall
prices may appear quite stable. The Telegraph calculated a ‘Real Cost of Living Index’ of
9.5%, taking into account rocketing food and energy costs.

Inflation is already being blamed on ‘greedy’ workers demanding they maintain their
standards of living, despite wages in the economy as a whole failing to keep up with
inflation over the past decade.

The irony here is that Gordon Brown built his ‘prudent’ reputation by keeping wages down –
and profits up – while the economy grew. But a growing economy requires growing
consumption. How are we to consume more if our wages aren’t keeping up? The ‘answer’ was
cheap credit for all to plug the gap; a pyramid scheme reliant on rising house prices -
the reason we are up to our eyeballs in debt.

Now that the housing market has begun to fall and credit is beginning to dry up, inflation
is doing the dirty work. Behind all the talk of the ‘credit crunch’ and rising oil prices,
inflation is just the latest means to a familiar end – employers always want us to do more
work for as little pay as they can get away with (just consider unpaid overtime,
understaffing, increasing workloads...).

Therefore the only way to fight the current pay cuts is to fight for our own interests
against theirs; regardless of the state of the economy our standard of living is only ever
as low as we let them push it or as high as we can win through collective action.

Dirty dealings at the LSE

At the London School of Economics the cleaning contract is held by ISS, a multinational
with lots of privatised cleaning contracts, including the London Underground. The cleaners
are mainly Latin American with poor English and a fear of joining a union or speaking out
about their lousy pay and conditions.

As a result of a campaign by Justice for Cleaners, the LSE has adopted the London Living
Wage which is higher than the National Minimum Wage. However, it was phased in over three
years of the new cleaning contract.

Worse, the workers are paying for it. They are currently paid £6 per hour but staffing has
been cut and they have to work harder. This has affected standards of cleaning -
management blame the new contract for mice in the Library.

iss is well known on the Underground for using immigration controls to victimise
organisers and intimidate the workforce. Union activists in the recent strike by cleaners
on the Underground have been suspended without pay, allegedly for working with bogus or
incorrect National Insurance numbers. They’ve worked with these numbers for years - this
is simply victimisation.

National Physical Laboratories once arranged an immigration raid on its cleaners to cut
the workforce and cut costs. iss is rumoured to have used document checks against workers
at the LSE earlier this year. Hard facts are difficult to come by due to the reluctance of
cleaners to talk to union activists, but there is a suspicion that the workforce was cut
by this method.

LSE likes to think of itself as special, it’s paternalistic. Its apparent benevolence -
especially if your face fits - helps to undermine union membership as many people think
they don’t need a union. Yet scratch the surface and the need for organisation couldn’t be
clearer.

We have to organise in solidarity with cleaners and push for the contract to be taken back
in house on the grounds that it isn’t really value for money. We also have to recognise
that immigration controls are a means of undermining pay and conditions and disciplining
vulnerable workers, and oppose them.

Who we are...

Anarcho-syndicalists believe that workplace organisation has to be based in the workplace
and to involve the membership of all the unions in each workplace. Pay rises, job safety
and control over how we work will not be won by representation, but by workers taking
action for themselves, independent of their bosses or any would-be representatives.

“Workers rights” will only be won by direct action, or by negotiations backed up by the
credible threat of direct action, regardless of legislation. Confusing workplace
representatives with the rank and file only obscures the real task we face - that of
building effective organisation in the workplace.

To this end, we organise in Networks across industries and in Locals geographically, to
support each other in our struggles and to fight for our interests, both in and out of the
workplace.

Solidarity Federation is part of the International Workers Association, organising with
like minded people across the world.

We’d like to distibute Catalyst as widely as possible, so if you’d like to distribute
locally, get in touch at one of the addresses’ below or - Catalyst@solfed.org.uk

For more information: solfed@solfed.org.uk PO Box 29, South West D.O. Manchester M15 5HW
07984 675281
www.solfed.org.uk | www.selfed.org.uk | www.direct-action.org.uk | www.ewn.rgbi.net

Can I phone a friend?

Pell and Bales is a London call centre that raises funds on behalf of major charities.
Since a venture capital company, ICENI, bought shares in P&B, the volume of calls staff
must make has increased.

This added pressure led to friction between management and staff, and an increase in petty
disciplinary actions and grievances.

Pat Carmody, a caller and CWU rep at Pell & Bales, helped build a fast-growing union that
won a pay increase for the first time in 6 years and is capable of winning disciplinaries
and grievances. Senior management were none too pleased.

In June, Carmody was suspended for writing an article for Socialist Worker in defence of a
suspended colleague. Management claimed the article defamed the company and suspended him.

In June 2008 a solidarity picket outside of Pell & Bales’ office was called, attended by
supporters, including workers from Shelter, the Solidarity Federation and the London
Coalition Against Poverty.

He was sacked on the 21st June, but won his appeal and was reinstated with back pay on the
22nd July. However, he did receive a final written warning and management intend to
rewrite the text of the staff handbook to reinforce their control of press relations.

If we are to defend our rights to freedom of speech and stop the victimisation of active
union members, then we must repeat such acts of solidarity.

Day of action against Starbucks

On 5th July this year, members of Solidarity Federation joined a day of action against
Starbucks, after the coffee chain fired a CNT member in Spain and an Industrial Workers of
the World organiser in Grand Rapids, USA. The action was called by the International
Workers Association, (of which SolFed and CNT are affiliates) and the IWW.

Know your rights: Trade Union Membership

You are protected against being fired or refused a job because of trade union membership
or activities, including activities in the past. Your employer is not allowed to treat you
any differently if you are a member of a trade union. This means that they must not pass
you over for promotion or training opportunities, or treat you differently from non-union
members in any way. The same right also applies in the unlikely event of discrimination in
favour of union members.

In addition, you have the right to be accompanied by a union official in a disciplinary
hearing. You can also have someone accompany you in a grievance hearing if the grievance
relates to your terms and conditions of employment.

If these rights are denied, or you are sacked for anything related to trying to exercise
your rights, you have a case that can be taken to an Employment Tribunal; though it should
be mentioned that they are stacked in favour of the employers with little compensation
available.

For more information on your rights at work: www.stuffyourboss.com

Cleaning up on the tube

London tube cleaners have won crucial pay increases from cleaning companies, with their
£5.50 an hour poverty wages being brought up to £7.45.

Cleaners on Metronet contracts were granted the ‘ London living wage’ in July through a
wider initiative whilst those working for ISS (contracted by Tubelines) won a staggered
pay rise in pre-strike negotiations in August.

With the 48hour RMT strike in June/July and the planned three day strike in August forcing
the hand of ISS, the cleaners have demonstrated their strength and gained from it.
However, their fight is far from over with the strike committee continuing to meet in
pursuit of unmet demands - more holidays, better sick pay, a decent pension and an end to
the scandal of ‘third party sackings’.

With more strikes in the pipeline, lessons need to be learned if more gains are to be
made. In the first strike T&G/Unite balloted late and didn’t join, making it less
effective. The strike could also have been more successful if RMT cleaners had not been
told to finish their shifts if they ended after the strike had begun, instead of all
walking out together. This left workers isolated and open to pressure from management. A
tougher obstacle has been ISS suspending strikers without pay on the grounds that there
are irregularities with their NI numbers. Not only are these the same NI numbers they have
always used, bringing the timing of the suspensions into question, but non-strikers have
merely been asked to provide the documents without being suspended. These are clear cases
of victimisation and examples of how immigration controls are used directly by companies
seeking to profit from insecure, cheap labour to discipline their workforce and prevent it
from improving its lot. Outsourcing and this kind of business practice go hand in hand.

The unions need a strategy for defending their members from this kind of attack. In this
instance the RMT were slow to defend their suspended members where they could have got
prompt and supportive legal advice and representation from immigration solicitors. The RMT
is, however, pursuing a strategy of tackling outsourcing, first by seeking to bring
workers’ conditions up to the standard of London Underground staff. They have already won
the victory over post-Transfer recruits to Metronet after being brought back in-house.

Service not included

Following our piece on tips in the last issue, The Independent launched a campaign on the
same issue. They didn’t credit either us or the trades unions, which have been campaigning
on the issue much longer.

This newspaper campaign seems to have had some effect, however. “Government insiders” now
claim they will address the issue in the autumn. More significantly, a prominent “Old”
Labour figure has admitted delivering restaurant workers into the hands of their
exploiters when drafting minimum wage legislation in 1997.

Ian McCartney, ex-trades union official and token ex-prole in the government, admitted
that he sold out workers to ensure the agreement of bosses to the minimum wage. While this
ex-waiter banned the use of cash tips to top up the minimum wage, he agreed to a legal
loophole allowing catering bosses to use “service charges” for the same purpose.

In spite of the massive “electoral mandate” enjoyed by his government, he was more
committed to getting the agreement of bosses than he was to helping vulnerable workers. In
the end, lobbying by the “catering industry” counted for more than votes. Democracy in a
nutshell!

Education, Education, Education

Higher Education faces significant changes in the coming years as universities move to a
market based model. Tuition and top-up fees are perhaps the more visible signs of this but
many institutions are now seeing changes which, among other things, significantly affect
education workers’ terms and conditions. Union responses so far have seen conferences like
NUS’s (National Union of Students) ‘Reclaim the Campus’ and UCU’s ‘Challenging the market
in education’ (University and College Union)

Meanwhile, the more action-minded have been far from quiet. The Universities of Sussex and
Manchester, for example, both saw occupations, demonstrations and demands to end this
commercialisation process. In both cases, while the impetus for action has come from
student activists, university workers have also been involved. In Sussex, the ‘Sussex not
4 Sale’ campaign organised the largest rally in Brighton for 20 years.

In Manchester members of the SF’s Education Workers’ Network have been involved in the
‘Reclaim the Uni’ campaign which organised a march and occupation and put together a list
of demands, several of which related to staff issues.

Meanwhile, commercialisation continues apace at Manchester. The introduction of an
internal market is bringing about a situation where each building has devolved decision
making. Though they use university support staff at the moment there is no reason why work
cannot be outsourced and, in the case of one new building complex, private night time
security staff are to be used. Also the no compulsory redundancy agreement runs out later
this year. Although there have already been upwards of 800 voluntary redundancies, with
the university still massively in debt because of its dash for ‘world class university’
status and with an expected squeeze on public spending there are growing concerns that
compulsory redundancies are a distinct possibility.

While it has been encouraging to see university staff and students beginning to come
together to oppose the current neoliberal climate in universities, it is going to require
much more of the same to reverse the flow of change. It is to be hoped that these positive
moves can re-gather momentum as soon as the summer break is over.

For continuing coverage of struggles in the education sector see Education Worker
available online at www.ewn.rgbi.net

Making a killing

Nearly twice as many people die from fatal injuries at work than are victims of homicide,
a new report has revealed. At least 1,300 people died as a result of fatal occupational
injuries in 2005-06 in England and Wales, compared with 765 homicide deaths. It was also
found that non-fatal workplace injuries requiring hospitalisation were far higher than
those needing treatment following a violent crime.

Yet at a time when crime, especially violent crime, takes centre stage and any working
class youth who likes wearing a hood is stigmatized as a potential mass murderer, the
violent crime and murder taking place in the workplace everyday is never reported.
Moreover, while Labour responds to every Daily Mail hang-and-flog-them headline by
throwing yet more people into already overcrowded jails the perpetrators of crime in the
workplace get off virtually scot-free

The trend towards ‘light touch’ regulation of business has in effect ‘decriminalised’
death and injury at work. While sentences for violent crime rocket, the Health and Safety
Executive’s enforcement notices fell by 40% and prosecutions fell by 49% between 2001/02
and 2005/06. The collapse in HSE enforcement and prosecution sends a clear message that
the government is prepared to let employers kill and maim with impunity.

No better example of this occurred at North West Aerosols Ltd where an accident killed one
worker and seriously injured several others. Though the judge described conditions in the
factory as “an accident waiting to happen” the directors of the company, who didn’t even
bother to show up at any of the hearings, were fined £2 and £1 costs as the company had
conveniently been put into receivership after the accident occurred.

The HSE expressed satisfaction at the outcome stating that the trial “would act as a
deterrent to other companies.” The sister of the dead man stated “It’s just a joke. There
is no justice. I will not let this rest and I intend to fight on, not just for the sake of
Christopher but for all the other employees who are put at risk by results like this.”

The reality is that you’re far safer walking alone at night than you are going to work. As
hundreds of thousands of workers and their families know, it is the violence associated
with working for a living that is most likely to kill and hospitalise. But you will never
hear that mentioned in the media or by politicians; it’s far more important to concentrate
on the crime committed by working class youth and leave the bosses to quietly get on with
maiming and killing their workers in the quest for ever higher profits.

solfed.org.uk | direct-action.org.uk | selfed.org.uk | stuffyourboss.com | dam-iwa.org.uk
| swf-iwa.org.uk | af-britain.org.uk | iwa-ait.org
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://ainfos.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en


A-Infos Information Center