A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **

News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Trk�_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Trk�
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours || of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF | How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
{Info on A-Infos}

(en) Venezuela, The first ever Caracas Libertarian Bookfair

Date Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:46:52 +0200

From 16-22 November, Caracas-based anarchist newspaper El Libertario hosted the first
ever Libertarian Bookfair of its kind in Venezuela. Below is something of an evaluation of
the week, plus some analysis of the political spectrum inside the country. ---- The event
- which coincided with the state-organised Bookfair but five stops away on the Caracas
Metro - was small in its size and modest in its ambitions, but at times inspiring and
motivating. The simultaneity of the two bookfairs warranted a comparative article on the
website of BBC Mundo (the BBC's Spanish language service), which represented great
exposure. (Quite how the reporter decided that Nelson was the "owner" of El Libertario is
beyond me though). Moreover, the Fair's location (until the weekend at least) on the
campus of Universidad Central de Venezuela - Venezuela's big public university - was a
tactical coup.

In a state with a weak, unbalanced sense of bourgeois democracy and only a marginal
commitment to freedom of expression, anarchists and fellow travellers have to take even
more precautions than in other places. La Central, with a politicised student body and
faculty members, who consider their "autónomo" status (a standard of many public
universities in Latin countries which enshrines in law that the police and military can
only step on campus in the event of being expressly invited by the university rector) to
be just one part of their commitment to political independence. Previously, El Libertario
members have received harassment in public from chavistas and antichavistas alike, so
security had to be paramount here.

Of course, the very convocation of an anarchist bookfair in the first place represents
something of a high point for Venezuelan revolutionary struggle. Unlike Mexico, Argentina,
Brazil and some of the other more affluent Latin American countries, Venezuela has
practically no anarchist history at all. The publication of the first ever El Libertario
in 1995 represented one of the very first expressions of libertarian thought in the
country's history, while the attempt to create a national anarchist federation (the CRA -
Comisión de Relaciones Anarquistas") a few years ago ultimately resulted in failure due to
the tiny size of the scene. Members of the Caracas collective had organised a similar
dissenting event to the World Social Forum - hosted by Chávez in Caracas in 2006 - in
which around 60-70 individuals crammed themselves into the space the collective share with
a sympathetic photographer near the city centre, but the Bookfair was much larger in scope.

Throughout the week, discussions revolved around the basics of anarchist thought and its
application to contemporary national political discourse (the issue of opposing chavista
attacks on working and living conditions while not becoming incorporated into the
pro-business, right-wing opposition being a running theme), the plight of refugees in the
region, and the role of women in a revolutionary movement, amongst other subjects.
Lunchtime workshops were also held on photography, human rights and using the internet as
a militant's tool. In the afternoons, films with revolutionary content were shown, and
these were popular with many attendees, although the tight nature of the schedule
prevented much discussion about the issues the movies raised. All this, of course, against
the backdrop of a smattering of stalls offering a broad variety of literature in the
Spanish language, with publications from groups throughout the Americas and Spain (and
even a few Resistances and Direct Actions!).

Unfortunately, illness and work commitments prevented me from attending many of the
activities throughout the seven days, but I did manage to catch a presentation by the folk
from the Victims' Committee Against Impunity (CVCI) in Lara state on Saturday. After
watching a documentary that the group had made on the labourious process of making
official complaints ("denuncias") in response to police homicides (a figure which runs at
over 7,000 in that state alone for this decade), and the risks of making such "denuncias"
in a region in which the drugs and arms trade are run by Mafiosi cabals of police and
politicians (with prominent activists being followed by unmarked cars and armed men), we
were shocked and devastated to discover five days later that a 24 year old cameraman with
the organisation had been assassinated by unidentified gunmen outside his house. In the
face of such a rapacious orgy of murder, the CVCI needs solidarity in its attempts to
counter the police's activities in their communities, with an eye to establishing
alternative, neighbourhood-based security initiatives.

Following the thoroughly harrowing meeting with the CVCI, a number of dreadlocked,
be-capped, baggy-trousered oiks showed up with Coke bottles full of alcohol and proceeded
to serenade the hereby gathered with a raucous and somewhat chaotic session of socially
conscious hip hop. Although - as throughout the week - their audience was low and largely
pretty unresponsive, I was impressed by the relaxed atmosphere during their various sets
(over here, hip hop is associated with the "malandro" - criminal - subculture and many
shows are broken up by gunfights), as well as the high level of political understanding
many of the MCs demonstrated. One kid - drunk off his ass and with his shiny Adidas
trousers around his knees - caused me to raise my eyebrows when he namechecked Kropotkin,
while another tune deconstructed the facets of state capitalism with a precision that many
British Politics students would find testing.

Of course, all events are only as worthwhile as the subsequent activity they inspire, and,
at times, the low concentration of interested parties seemed problematic. It is definitely
true that the near-non-functional status of Caracas transportation - and the de facto
after dark curfew imposed by its astronomically high crime rate - impede any sort of
independent political activity. The weekend venue for the Bookfair was only seven blocks
from a Metro station, but it's unsafe to walk alone at night in many areas and most folk
in the city start to worry about getting home after 7pm (even on weekends).

An even bigger obstacle though, is the somewhat primitive nature of mainstream Venezuelan
politics in comparison to the norms of First World discourse. The binary between chavismo
and antichavismo is well-documented and at times, it seems almost all-encompassing. El
Libertario have acknowledged how the fluidity of "el proceso" is its greatest strength,
managing to harangue community activists, patriots, yankee-bashers and leftists into its
forces and isolating those who advocate radical social change. The right wing opposition -
bank-rolled by big business and the tiny elite - struggles to match Chávez' populism, but
a popular base is coalescing around those who note the disparities between the wild
prognoses of the regime for Venezuelan quality of life and reality, helped by the
insidious ubiquity of cable TV and consumerist culture. Existing outside of these
intensely magnetic poles has always been difficult, although new spaces are emerging, as
much as a result of conflicts within "el proceso" itself as anything else.

Rather disappointingly, what - to my mind at least - was the most interesting talk at the
Bookfair, on the slow development of an independent union movement to the left of Chávez,
was cancelled at the last minute by its union leader speaker, a Trotskyist. No proper
reason was given, although many of the assembled murmured disparagingly about the rather
contradictory line much of the Trotsykist movement takes on chavismo, and the unpopularity
of El Libertario's resolve in its opposition to the regime. Examples do exist of struggles
exploiting the space Chávez is leaving to the left, such as the Sidor steelworkers and in
the Sierra de Perijá, Zulia state, where indigenous people are battling against government
efforts to extract coal in their communities. An opportunity was also missed at the
Bookfair, when struggling university maintenance workers (who have been striking and
blocking vehicular access to the campus one day a week since I moved here) were not
engaged with, with priority being given to considering how their actions might affect
Bookfair attendance. In fairness, I am unaware of the details of this struggle, and
whether the workers are chavista, antichavista or independent (I was ill on the day they
were out), but in future, such opportunities to engage with militant, angry workers must
not be missed.

With a rising ride of social movements nationally, chavismo has acted fast. El Libertario
estimates that some 2,000 individuals face criminal proceedings of one kind or another for
their involvement in social movements. And in the absence of an entrenched Venezuelan
civil society (El Libertario note that such a body only really came into existence
following the "caracazo" uprising and subsequent http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caracazo
massacre of 1989), revolutionary movements have been pushed into making demands for "human
rights" around protest. This was notable at the Bookfair, where approximately one third of
the stalls had human rights content, and free posters were distributed claiming that
"PROTESTING IS A RIGHT, NOT AN OFFENCE". I was also passed a DVD documentary made by
collective members in conjunction with the Provea human rights group about the Amparo
massacre, the year before the "caracazo", in which the army killed 14 fishermen suspected
of being guerrillas.

The occupation of territory usually better designated for liberal reformists by so called
anarchists could be said to be problematic, but thus far, I have seen it facilitate the
flow of information and maintenance of links with the nation's many, fragmented social
movements, a tall order in a country where the mainstream media is dominated by the
pro-business, anti-worker prerogative of both sides of Venezuela's false polarisation.
We'll see how this one pans out as I become more acquainted with it.

If one third of the Bookfair’s space was given over to human rights materials, then a
second third was dedicated to punk-related merchandise, including fanzines, CDs, badges
and patches. This is a bigger issue, in my opinion, and I'm speaking as someone who still
loosely identifies with punk rock culture. Indeed, a cursory glance at active
"libertarios" would denote a very strong punk demographic, with all the contradictions
that that entails. The issues between punk rock and anarchism are now enshrined in Libcom
orthodoxy - and rightly so, from personal experience - yet I find myself making the same
arguments again (this time in Spanish, and in a Discharge shirt).

As a result of the Bookfair and the handful of individual who registered a definite
interest in Caracas' anarchist movement, the meetings of the editorial collective have
been regularised and opened up to discussion outside of the remit of the newspaper itself.
This is positive, yet it is early days and the group as a whole lack confidence. The
sceptre of punk rock culture must also be exorcised more emphatically from the anarchist
scene, since many of the supposed 'allies' of the newspaper (self-proclaimed "anarcho
punks") failed to attend the Bookfair, despite having organised usage of the space for
their own event two weeks later (a "Do It Yourself" weekender, for individuals who are
"distancing themselves from the conception of 'waiting for times to change for the
better'" in favour of "changing ourselves in the here and now", which apparently equates
to workshops on DIY tattoos and "punk hairdressing"!). The group has also been criticised
for being too synthesist, but I think this is more of a reflection on youthful and
inexperienced nature of Venezuelan anarchism as a whole.

Encouragingly, as well as agreeing to schedule a series of public meetings on campus about
anarchism, the group has also undertaken to hold internal discussion forums, in which
members will have a chance to elaborate their own visions and hammer out our differences .
In the meantime, the possibilities for a revolutionary alternative to chavismo -
encouraged by increased desertion of bolivarianismo by members of its original rank and
file - will continue to motivate the publication and distribution of El Libertario.

A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://ainfos.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en

A-Infos Information Center