A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **

News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Trk�_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Trk�
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours || of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF | How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
{Info on A-Infos}

(en) Canada, Anarchist Journal, Linchpin #1 - Ideas>> True Democracy: Anarchism as Order

Date Tue, 04 Dec 2007 10:37:38 +0200

When reports of social breakdown are reported on the news, we always hear that
it is 'anarchy'. What can it mean when we say we are anarchists? Chaos and
terror? Anarchy means no rulers, just like mon-archy means one ruler explains
Wes. ---- In places like Somalia and Afghanistan the problem is not an absence
of rulers, but too many rulers. The violence and chaos is the product of
warlords, each a petty authoritarian trying to grab more power. Anarchists,
those who believe in society without rulers, cannot possibly support chaos,
because chaos and disorder breed authoritarianism. ---- The influential Italian
anarchist Errico Malatesta pointed out a long time ago that: 'apart from brute
force' the origin and justification for authority lies in social
disorganization. When a community has needs and its members do not know how to
organize spontaneously to provide them an authority satisfies those needs by
utilizing the services of all and directing them as well as imposing itself and
throwing its weight around, the less organized we have been, the more prone are
we to be imposed on by a few individuals, organization, far from creating
authority, is the only cure for it and the only means whereby each one of us
will get used to taking an active and conscious part in the collective work, and
cease being passive instruments in the hands of leaders.

The question is not order versus disorder, but the type of order we want, and
how we can organize to secure it. For this it makes sense to go back to another
term that rulers have cynically manipulated to their advantage democracy, rule
by the people. If the people rule then there is no room for a ruling class.
While it is certainly preferable to have some degree of choice over who rules,
having some input into who rules is not the same as having control over our own
lives. Real democracy means directly democratic assemblies in our communities
and in our workplaces, which then federate, as coordination is an absolute
necessity. It is not enough to have pieces of paper that say that the people
rule. True democracy is something that we have to live on a day to day basis.

To have such a real, lived freedom, one where we control our lives together with
our fellow citizens, if we are to have a society without rulers, then we cannot
possibly stop at opposing the political ruling class. What we live is more
important than what it says on a piece of paper, and the reality is that
economic warlords control our lives at work and in our communities. We oppose
governments, but at least they have to pretend to be responsible to us. People
like Stephan Harper talk about getting big government off of our backs, not to
give us more control over our lives, our work, or our communities, but to put
gigantic business on our backs, which does not even pretend to be democratic.

Their opposition to the power of the state is the opposition of the warlord, who
wants to the power to dominate and exploit. This is also why they always want
more police and prisons, and fewer rights for us, when they talk about a smaller
state. They are usually pretty good at hiding what they really want, but it
peeks out at times, like when Conrad Black said, "I'm not prepared to re-enact
the French Revolution's renunciation of the rights of the nobility". That is the
truth of who they are, and how they see the rest of us.

This is why we are anarchist communists. Capitalism only means the liberty of
the powerful to oppress the rest of us. Socialism has always been about opposing
the tyranny of the boss class, but it defeats the purpose if we put the power in
the hands of the state. The choice between an economic ruling class (ie the
bosses) or the political ruling class (ie politicians) is a false one. We say
neither, we want freedom. And we can only secure this by organizing, by building
our capacity to self govern, through federated, directly democractic assemblies,
in our own autonomous organizations.
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
A-infos-en mailing list

A-Infos Information Center