A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **

News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_ The.Supplement
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours || of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF | How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
{Info on A-Infos}

(en) Italy: FdCA document - "Towards a programme of conflictual, class-struggle syndicalism"

Date Thu, 03 Nov 2005 14:03:43 +0200


Contributions to the debate
To all those comrades who have chosen the difficult path of union work in order
to play an active part in the class war, those who have chosen the labour organizations
as the main way to give voice and strength to the collective, immediate and historical
interests of the exploited, those who organize and carry out union activities using
the method of direct democracy, according to the class interests.
> The dimensions of a defeat...
If we analyse the events or processes which have begun but which have not yet
ended, the economic cycle, what do we find again and again? The reduction of
the numbers of productive units; the shifting of certain sectors to countries
with a cheaper workforce and no restrictions on environmental pollution;
changes to the organization of labour with increasingly precarious jobs and
conditions; the outsourcing of tasks to external companies; the introduction of
telework; the development of information technologies and their application
within the productive process; the introduction of policies restricting the
productive base; the repression of consumption; the rapid acceleration of the
flexible use of the workforce and the tendency to create wage differentiation.
While all these processes have been crowned by the policies of the centre-right
Government, it must be noted that they originated with previous governments -
the "Biagi law", for example, is merely a somewhat harsher version of the "Treu
Packet", in other words, the progressive demolition of National labour
Contracts; the transformation of deferred and indirect wages into an
opportunity for welfare to enter the market.


Partnership syndicalism

Concertation, triangulation, partnership. Taking over the national economic
interests (a sort of neo-corporativism) by sacrificing the interests of the
workers. The drama of the confederal unions is a double one: on the one hand,
they try to "govern" the macroeconomic choices, sitting down to bargain while
playing the part of the representative of society whose viewpoint is obligatory
and binding, but the new economic phase does not seem to take into account the
union as a constituent element of the new social pact, there is no space in
Capital's plans for the CGIL's form of co-management nor for the Chirstian
solidarity of the CISL.

On the other hand, they try to "govern" the wage bargaining for national
contracts by forcing it on a counterpart who willingly accepts, provided it is
an empty shell whose contents escape the control of the workers inasmuch as
they are dictated by compatibility with the system (company planning,
productivity).

On its path towards total institutionalization, partnership syndicalism is thus
destined to become a consultation agency, a manager of financial services for
the worker. The deceit of and the damage to millions of union members is thus
two-fold: the idea continues to spread that THIS is the only possible form of
syndicalism, while at the same time the very notion, the practice and the
memory of the union as a place where the workers develop and collectively
defend their class interests is being lost.

It is true that there still exists (or rather, resists) some opposition within
certain categories or in certain geographical areas; it is true that there are
still harsh struggles being carried on in individual areas where the unity of
the workers demands a more conflictual form of syndicalism which prevails over
the usual stance of the CGIL or the CISL; it is true that the coordinating
groups of RSUs (union representatives) in certain sectors or parts of the
country still manage to impose another point of view in place of the decisions
of local or national union leaders.

But these situations no longer seem to be able to "save" the confederal unions
(and above all the bureaucratic-managerial class of the unions) and lead them
to really represent the workers and fight, to drag them out of the mire of
partnership syndicalism and move towards a more conflictual form of
syndicalism.

Currently, the leadership of the CGIL (which is heading for its Congress)
appears to have moved away from a strictly pro-partnership position. However,
it must also be noted that the Confindustria (the employers' association) under
Montezemolo is no longer as radically confrontational as it was under D'Amato.
If there is a change in the government, it could lead to the CGIL's
middle-management, who in effect grew up with the policy of partnership and who
still quietly support it, coming once again to the fore.


Conflictual syndicalism

The gap that partnership syndicalism has created and continues to create has
allowed various alternative and grassroots labour organizations and groupings
to develop, whose creation, spread and growth is linked to the personal
histories of their union activists, to particular places and to particular
sectors. These groupings, having moved on from grassroots committees ("cobas")
to become unions proper, have increased their membership, have succeeded in
getting their representatives elected to RSUs in a number of categories over
recent years, and even manage to launch and promote strugles (both local and
national) which have had reasonable support, EVEN among non-members. With the
growth in their credibility and representativity (political, if not numerical),
there should also be an increase in responsibility in these unions - both with
respect to their own members and with respect to all workers - as the bearers
of an alternative way.

Unfortunately, the plurality of the grassroots unions has thus far failed to
bring added VALUE to conflictual syndicalism, but has turned into a break-up of
workers' unity, leading to a weakening of the alternative way, that of
recreating class-struggle, direct democratic syndicalism. It is to be hoped
therefore that the grassroots unions increase their co-ordination and that the
grassroots struggles can be federated, both as a general strategy and also on
an immediate basis, given the likelihood of change within the political and
institutional scenario.


The role of Revolutionary labour activists

There are many Revolutionary workers who are active in the unions, from the
left wing of the CGIL to the various Cobas, from the USI to Unicobas and the
RdB/CUB, in different sectors and categories, in a range of geographical and
political areas. Many others are not tied to any particular union. More often
than not, the choice of union is dictated by the situation in the workplace
rather than by any revolutionary feeling, or by the fact that the worker shares
a particular policy or struggle of a particular union rather than any blind
attachment to one union or another. Very often only the anarchist and
libertarian union activists can actually be elements of union between the
workers and not of division, or are able to point out common interests and
intent rather than fall back on sectarianism. And this is because they are
there where the class consciousness is organized in any given moment, in the
forms that the social conflict and the workers themselves mark out.

There are no special pre-defined methods or forms of syndicalism to be
followed: more importantly than the unions themselves, anarchist union
activists pay more attention to the forms of class self-organization in the
workplace and in the community, because the mass organization is built from
that starting point. It is a starting point and organized dimension where
anarchist union activists are present and are working to promote.

Anarchist union activists choose the worker over the particular union, they
choose the unity of the workers over the particular union, they support the
workers' struggles for the defence of their interests independently of the form
or particular union invlved, of the type of syndicalism involved, as long as it
can lead to an improvement in the proletariat's living conditions and to the
creation of more freedoms within society!

In the workplace, building the unity of interests between workers with
different types of contract, winning back the power of decentralized
bargaining, protecting the right to health, managing working hours in order to
better manage our lives, detaching pay from productivity.

In the community, building opportunities where we can seek to rebuild the
fabric of association, of debate, of political and cultural elaboration, of
solidarity that was once typical of the old Mutual Aid Societies and cultural
circles which gave the workers' movement strength and ensured the efficient
defence of class interests.

Or Inter-Union Labour Clubs, inter-category associations, union aliances or RSU
delegate aliances, which can encourage the building of relationships and labour
strategies that go beyond political and union affiliation. Places that can make
the most of all the richness of the different experiences of unions, of
self-managed groupings, of those labour and political militants who mark out
and pursue struggles (both partial and more general) in which the workers of
various affiliation can be federated.

On a national level, we support the spread of conflictual syndicalism so that
it can become the distinguishing feature of federations of class segments,
union activists and various grassroots unions. Given that at present the
convergence of grassroots syndicalism into one single organization is not a
credible prospect, though it is urgent and necessary that conflictual
syndicalism establish itself as a real, alternative and effective forces for
the workers, the least that must be done now is to create a platform for
class-struggle syndicalism.

A platform which must include the aims and principles regarding pay, working
hours, rights, services and union democracy for all workers, be they Italian or
otherwise, north or south, in permanent or precarious employment:

1) struggle for union and political freedoms: the freedom to strike;
the freedom of assembly; the freedom of labour organization and
of expression in the workplace; full operability for all labour
organizations;
2) struggle for employment and against casual work relations, against
all destructurization of the labour market; struggle against modern
forms of day-work and against manpower agencies; the abolition of
Law 30/2003; equal pay for equal work;
3) struggle for a European inter-category minimum wage; the defence
and increase of indirect wages and social services; the defence
and extension of deferred wages with workers' self-determination
of their severance pay and its revaluation on the basis of the cost
of living;
4) full access of all migrant workers to the formal structures of
work relationships and to the world of labour in the host countries,
with full rights and pay parity;
5) struggle against discrimination in social rights and guarantees,
in forms of work and job contracts, on the basis of productive and
socio-cultural criteria; struggle against the re-introduction of
wage ceilings;
6) struggle for access to social services by whoever needs them;
struggle against the privatization of social services (education,
healthcare, transport, energy, telecommunications, etc.);
7) struggle against alienation from the world of employment;
8) struggle for pay parity between men and women;
9) internationalist support for the struggles of workers in other
countries and other economic areas;
10) struggle for free, public, secular education for all;
11) struggle for the right to a clean environment and health,
non-monetizable and non-negotiable, for a better quality of life;
12) against the repression of labour struggles, continuous counter-
information, renewed organization and strengthening of defence
bodies (defence funds, observatories on repression, solidarity
for comrades affected by disciplinary measures, legal aid networks);
13) re-introduction of the Syndicate of Councils, where all can elect
and be elected; free choice of candidates, recallable mandates;
departmental representatives on mandates from the assembly;
worker-elected delegates for bargaining at every phase of the talks.

Federazione dei Comunisti Anarchici
23rd October 2005

Adopted during the 4th National Labour Conference of the FdCA


http://www.fdca.it/fdcaen

From: Federazione dei Comunisti Anarchici <internazionale@fdca.it>
_______________________________________________
A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
http://ainfos.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en


A-Infos Information Center