A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
The.Supplement
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours ||
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF | How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
{Info on A-Infos}
(en) US, In Support of David Graeber
From
a-infos@ainfos.ca
Date
Wed, 11 May 2005 23:54:11 +0300
Delivered-to
ilan@ainfos.ca
Delivered-to
ainfos.ca-a-infos@mail.tuxic.nl
Delivered-to
ainfos.ca-a-infos-en@mail.tuxic.nl
List-archive
<http://tuxic.nl/pipermail/a-infos>
List-help
<mailto:a-infos-request@ainfos.ca?subject=help>
List-id
a-infos.ainfos.ca
List-post
<mailto:a-infos@ainfos.ca>
List-subscribe
<http://ainfos.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a-infos>, <mailto:a-infos-request@ainfos.ca?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe
<http://ainfos.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a-infos>, <mailto:a-infos-request@ainfos.ca?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1
from chuck@mutualaid.org
In Support of David Graeber by Andrej Grubacic
Recently David Graeber and I wrote an article together attempting
to explain why anarchist ideas have received almost no attention in
the academy. When you think of it, academia is full of Marxist
radicals, but only a handful of professed anarchists. We came to a
conclusion that it must have something to do with anarchism's
concern with forms of practice; with its insistence that one's means
most be consonant with one's ends; with its stubborn rejection of
the idea that we can create freedom through authoritarian means,
embracing instead the position that we should embody the society
we wish to create. All of this does not square very well with
operating within a university. The university has survived in much
the same form since the middle ages, waging intellectual battles at
conferences, re-enforcing class distinctions, making cabalistic
decisions in secret rooms. As we stated in our article: "At the very
least, one would imagine being an openly anarchist professor would
mean challenging the way universities are run and that, of course,
is going to get one in far more trouble than anything one could ever
write".
Ironically enough, as if he was testing his own hypothesis,
internationally respected anarchist anthropologist, David Graeber,
was fired from Yale University a few days ago. Of course, that
wasn't the official explanation. The official one reads that "his
contract wasn't renewed" because of his lack of "collegiality". If you
would allow me to translate this: the "lack of collegiality" that David
had showed was when he was trying to defend his graduate
students who were graduate union organizers. Union organizers are
regularly targeted at Yale. When one brilliant graduate student
organizer was almost kicked out for clearly fabricated reasons,
David Graeber was the only member of her committee with the
courage to openly stand up for her at that committee meeting, and
then later at a faculty meeting. On david Graeber's behalf, Yale
graduate students have initiated a petition which has been signed by
almost all graduate and good number of undergraduate students of
anthropology.
So, why has David Graeber been given the boot? To begin with the
obvious, he is an unrepentant anarchist. David Graeber was one of
the spokespeople for the Anti Capitalist Convergence during the
World Economic Forum protests in New York. He was an activist
with Direct Action Network. He is one of the founding members of
the Peoples Global Action infopoint in New York. And he had
authored many essays and articles on anarchism. But he never did
any organizing or activism on campus.
What perhaps was David Graeber's greatest crime was simply his
apparently over optimistic belief that he could remain true to his
anarchist principles within the academy. Graeber believes that
graduate school should be more than a training camp for becoming
a commodity on the academic market. Rather it should also be
about joy and creativity. Anyone who goes through a graduate
program knows that such institutions are all about socialization as
an academic, much of which requires the destruction of the sense
of joy and creativity in learning, thinking and imagining that draws
people to become scholars in the first place. For certain, some
universities are worse then others. For various reasons, Yale seems
to specialize in this kind of soul-crushing sport.
David Graeber offered his students an alternative model. He
believes that it's possible to be an academic intellectual and not an
academic prostitute, that it is possible not to sacrifice everything
that makes life enjoyable, that it is possible to be both intellectually
productive and politically committed. Given such convictions, is it
little wonder that David Graeber was given the boot?
As a close friend of David's, I have witnessed a somewhat frantic
activity on the behalf of a few members of the Yale faculty to have
him fired. Not incidentally, these faculty members have not been
speaking to David since his name was mentioned in the papers in
conjunction with the WEF protests three years ago. But ostracizing
him was difficult. Not only because of few decent colleagues who
ardently defended him. Since that time David has published two
well respected books and articles in dozens of languages. Last year
the Yale bureaucracy renewed David's contract for only two years,
citing his behavior as not being in accordance with Yale's
"academic ethics" and said that his contract might be extended two
more years if he improved "his behavior".
Last Tuesday a meeting was held to consider David's
reappointment. Only senior faculty were allowed to attend and
David was not permitted to respond to his accusations, nor where
his accusers expected to present evidence. After an extended
slander fest, participants seem to have concluded that it doesn't
really matter if the accusations are false and trivial, because his
presence is clearly divisive thus it would be safer to just kick him
out.
As someone who has spent many wonderful moments with David, I
am certainly not neutral here. But neither should you be. This issue
extends beyond the academic career of David Graeber. And beyond
the price one may have to pay for advocating anarchism in the
academy. In this country, at this exciting and surreal point of its
history, this could happen, as it already has, on so many different
levels, to anybody who refuses to participate in the Salem-like
atmosphere that is being systematically promoted in institutions like
Yale, or Columbia, or Colorado. To support David Graeber is to say
that we have had enough of this nation-wide persecution of leftist
professors, accused of 'falsifying' their "Native American identity",
of supporting anti-Semitism, or of being anarchists. To support
David Graeber means to support academic freedom and to reject
the conformist dictate of fear and obedience in the US academy.
_______________________________________________
A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
http://ainfos.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
_______________________________________________
A-infos mailing list
A-infos@ainfos.ca
http://ainfos.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a-infos
A-Infos Information Center