A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **

News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_ The.Supplement
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours || of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF | How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
{Info on A-Infos}

(en) US, Agitator Index, Bring the Ruckus vs. Race Traitor By Geert

From a-infos@ainfos.ca
Date Sun, 08 May 2005 21:34:58 +0300
Delivered-to ainfos.ca-a-infos@mail.tuxic.nl
List-archive <http://ainfos.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/private/a-infos>
List-help <mailto:a-infos-request@ainfos.ca?subject=help>
List-id a-infos.ainfos.ca
List-post <mailto:a-infos@ainfos.ca>
List-subscribe <http://ainfos.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a-infos>, <mailto:a-infos-request@ainfos.ca?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe <http://ainfos.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a-infos>, <mailto:a-infos-request@ainfos.ca?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization a-infos
User-agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1

From: a-infos-en@ainfos.ca
To: a-infos-en@ainfos.ca

The proletarian movement is the self-conscious, independent
movement of the immense majority, in the interest of the immense
majority. The proletariat, the lowest stratum of our present society,
cannot stir, cannot raise itself up, without the whole superincumbent
strata of official society being sprung into the air. ?Karl Marx, 1848
It can see to it that not only no action of this inner group [Blacks] is
opposed to the real interests of the nation, but that it works for an in
conjunction with the best interests of the nation. ?W.E.B. DuBois, 1940 [T]heir
agitation, resistance and the political developments that they can initiate, can
be the means whereby the proletariat is brought on to the scene. ?C.L.R. James, 1948

Is Bring the Ruckus* a Race Traitor Organization? Does Bring the
Ruckus subscribe to Race Traitor politics? Do Race Traitor and Bring
the Ruckus put whitey at the center of the revolutionary struggle?
These kinds of question pop up all the time. This brief piece tries to
bring some clarity to these kinds of questions.

Race Traitor is a radical journal that was founded in 1992. This
journal argued through articles, poetry, and personal stories that the
way to bring about revolutionary change in this country was to
?abolish the white race.?

The political reflected in Race Traitor follows in a long-tradition of
revolutionary politics in the U.S.. This is that tradition of the
Abolitionists, of W.E.B. Du Bois, and of C.L.R. James. This is the
tradition that has continually argued the fundamental importance of
the fighting the "color-line" in the U.S. as a revolutionary strategy.
There is no fundamental difference between Du Bois's analysis of
Reconstruction (1935), of James' arguments in the "Revolutionary
Answer to the Negro problem in the USA (1948)" and the positions
of Race Traitor or Bring the Ruckus. Dubois, James, Race Traitor,
BTR all argue the fundamental importance of fighting the color line
in order to create a new world. I believe one of the reasons that some
might think of BTR as a "Race Traitor" organization is because
fundamentally both the journal and our organization focus on
importance of the fighting the color line. This position is very
different from most organizations on the "Left".

BTR emerged in the wake of the death of ?Love and Rage" and the
?Seattle? protests. When Love and Rage was splitting, BTR was a
logical outcome of one of the positions on race within Love and Rage.
(see Roy San Filippo?s A New World in our Hearts, AK Press, 2003).
A few former L&R members are currently members in BTR. The
Sojourner Truth Organization (STO) was also important to both BTR
and Race Traitor. Former STO members are in both BTR and Race
Traitor. STO, which was one of the tendencies in ?New Communist
Movement? of the 1970s, also focused on importance of fighting the
color line. These different organizations and journal also belong to a
certain common tendency among revolutionaries.

A key difference, which distinguishes this tendency from other
tendencies, is its approach on race in the U.S. There is a difference
between a position of "Black and White, Unite and Fight" and
"Abolish the White Race" or whatever else you want to call ?the
problem?. The first is the common approach on the left to focus on
"class" and that there are poor POC as well as poor whites thus we
need to focus on their common problems of being poor and fight
together hand in hand. This was a common position within SDS,
within Love and Rage, within NEFAC. A second position of
?abolishing the white race? is the very different. This fight is against
the color line. If people today call this second position a "race traitor"
position, then I will stick with this second position and defend this
position. But I don't think of it as race traitor position, but obviously
both Race Traitor and BTR subscribe to this second position.

But of course, BTR and Race Traitor are not the same. In a sense,
BTR is an organization which is much more ambitious, vague, less
developed and is only in its cradle. Race Traitor is a journal not an
organization. Race Traitor is a project, which may or may not have
published its last issue (On Palestine). BTR is trying to develop a new
Praxis. I think BTR is building upon the work of race traitor, upon
the work of James, upon the work of STO, upon the work of Love
and Rage, upon the work of bell hooks and many, many others
including other tendencies. In a sense, to anyone who has ever read
C.L.R James, both Race Traitor and BTR are Jamesian Projects, but
different projects. When C.L.R. James, Grace Lee Boggs and
Cornelius Castoriadis wrote about the ?Marxist Organization? in
Facing Reality, this is the kind of autonomous organization that BTR
is modeled after which both rejects the vanguard and network.

There is a continuing critique of BTR as well as Race Traitor that
these politics puts whitey at the center. This is not true at all. Not for
BTR nor for Race Traitor. For Race Traitor, there is a special
message for so-called whites. Focusing on fighting the institutions
that hold up the color line and its strategic importance for revolution
does not come from so-called whites but from DuBois, C.L.R James,
Malcolm X, bell hooks and many others. Race Traitor follows in
these footsteps combining their militant language with ?social
construction? language and addressing the role of ?so-called? whites
in this process. An accusation that argues that Race Traitor puts
white?s as the saviors of the revolutionary struggle completely
misunderstand how Race Traitor is rooted in this long tradition of
fighting the color-line and the strategic importance of this struggle in
the creation of a new world.

BTR builds upon this tendency. We believe, that while this is not
solely sufficient, that fighting the institutions that hold up the color
line today will create the possibility for revolutionary change. BTR is
committed to developing an American revolutionary praxis for the
21st century. This is not putting whitey at the center and this is not
just a derivative of Race Traitor. This is a Jamesian project for the
21st century.
Geert is a member of Bring the Ruckus.
* [Bring The Rukus is an antiauthotitarian anticapitalist
direct action revolutionary initiative.]
A-infos mailing list

A-Infos Information Center