A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **

News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_ The.Supplement
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours || of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF | How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
{Info on A-Infos}

(en) Ireland, Anarchist Workers Solidarity #89 - Thinking about anarchism: Anarchism and human nature

Date Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:04:53 +0200

"Then, in the souls of the oppressed, powerless men every other man is taken
for hostile, inconsiderate, exploitative, cruel, sly whether he be noble or base."
- Friedrich Nietzsche - Human, All Too Human, 1878.
It's the last line of defence against anarchism. You're in the pub,
you've convinced them, they can see the possibilities, they want to
know more - they're interested and then the voice pops up: "shure that
would never work because of.... human nature...bud" But, in fairness,
it is a very sincerely held belief by many people, that we are "naturally"
greedy, rotten feckers and, in the absence of government, some mad
form of capitalism would be inevitable.

The English philosopher Hobbes was first to systemise this
pessimistic view of human nature. He coined the term " war of all
against all" to characterise a return to nature where people just
survived through hand to hand fighting, digging lumps out of each
other, even eating each other if necessary. Handily this horror could be
avoided if a sovereign was agreed to. This would be the last assertion
of power by the "people" as, after that, only the sovereign could rule.
Needless to say, his book "Leviathan" was a big hit with European
monarchs and rulers in the Seventeenth Century.

Rousseau expressed the exact opposite view about hundred years
later. He saw Mankind as "naturally good" and wanted to strip off the
layers of "civilisation" that were preventing us from being our most
"natural" and good selves.

Most anarchists, myself included, would see human nature as neither
good nor bad. The very terms are "socially constructed". People are
shaped by their biological make up and by their environment. You
can't change your biological inheritance (much!) but the influence of
your parents, education, friends, the media and so on vary widely from
person to person. In general the prevailing morality of a society, indeed
the very concepts of "good" and "bad" are set out by the ruling forces
in that society.

For example historically meekness and mildness are seen as "good"
where as selfishness and maliciousness are "bad".

Certain traits are encouraged because they keep us in line but cheeky
or rebellious ones are frowned on.

In this present western phase of late capitalist over-production two
things are required. 1. That we stay at home in front of "the box" and
cause no trouble. 2. That we pitch in and consume!

Advertising plays on our most basic human need for security and the
slightly more advanced need for contentment. It sells us a very shallow
in-duh-viduality based entirely on what we consume and how we look.
We become shallow, snobby, alienated and hostile towards everyone
around us as per the Nietzsche quote above. We want to do others
down. Basically the system encourages everything that is crap in us!

But we know people can be better than this. Just look at voluntary
organisations like the GAA, the lifeboat service etc. Local community
groups draw on the time and effort of thousands of people, which they
give quite gladly. Further, many of these grassroots organisations,
though they may appear quite harmless and run of the mill are run in a
very democratic fashion.

Some even practice direct democracy and so (though they might be
shocked to hear it) are functionally anarchist. They bring people
together, empower them and move them beyond in-duh-vidual
consumerism. They present for the system the danger of a good
example. We too know the power of a good example. When people
hear libertarian ideas and, where they see them working in practise
then their "better" side begins to emerge. Capitalism or any society of
leaders and led inevitably brings out our worst - that's what it's
designed to do. Anarchism brings out our best - that's what it's
designed to do!

There is no fixed, inalienable human nature - people can change, and
society can change - for the better.

This page is from the print version of the Irish Anarchist paper
'Workers Solidarity'. http://struggle.ws/wsm/paper.html

We also provide PDF files of all our
publications for you to print out and distribute locally

Print out the PDF file of this issue

You can find out when new issues of the paper come out by joining
the Ainriail list http://struggle.ws/other/ainriail.html

This edition is No89 published in Sept 2005
A-infos-en mailing list

A-Infos Information Center