A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **

News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Castellano_ Català_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_ The.Supplement
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours || of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF | How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
{Info on A-Infos}

(en) Ireland: Fortress Dublin? - Dirty Tricks & Criminalisation of Protest

From Worker <a-infos-en@ainfos.ca>
Date Sun, 9 May 2004 11:01:07 +0200 (CEST)


________________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
News about and of interest to anarchists
http://ainfos.ca/ http://ainfos.ca/index24.html
________________________________________________

The criminalisation of protest and the demonisation of dissent "The problem
associated with the dissent of protesters was dealt with in an efficient
and speedy manner..." - Michael Smith, Minister for Defence, 6.5.04.
Dublin Grassroots Network has compiled this dossier to highlight three things:
1. The systematic nature of the attempts by security forces and the Government
to criminalise protest and prevent the exercise of democratic rights. These
attempts cover the past month: before, during and after the May Day weekend.
2. The political responsibilities of those involved: not only the
security forces, but more importantly the Dept. of Justice and
ultimately the Government. At the end of the day, people were clubbed
off the Navan Road to prevent embarrassment to Bertie Ahern in front of
"European colleagues" such as Tony Blair and Silvio Berlusconi - and to
intimidate protestors in advance of George Bush’s visit.
3. The linkage between repression of dissent, in Ireland, Poland or
Iraq, and the policies we are protesting against: a neo-liberal drive
to privatisation which attacks ordinary people, a "war on terror" which
treats protestors as terrorists, and a "Fortress Europe" which has
caused over 3,000 deaths on its borders and which criminalises internal
opposition.

This dossier is a very brief list of events, all of which can be
readily documented from obvious sources (media archives, Indymedia). We
hope to be in a position to develop a more detailed history, but this
will naturally take time which for us as a voluntary organisation is
limited.

It consists of two parts: firstly a chronicle of recent events giving
rise to concern from the moment of the banning of the Farmleigh march;
secondly a dossier of "dirty tricks" which we prepared before the
banning of the march and released on Friday, April 30th.

PART I
Chronicle of recent events giving rise to concern

1. The banning of the Farmleigh march

On Thursday, April 29th, details of policing plans for the May Day
weekend were finally released, not officially but in a Prime Time
report. On Friday morning, not only many activists but many journalists
we talked to were unaware of the details.

Dublin Grassroots Network had been calling for clarification on
policing plans for a number of weeks, particularly in relation to
reports of the arming of gardai and the circumstances under which guns
could be used, as well as guidelines for the use of "non-lethal
weaponry". Failure to clarify these facts contributed to raising
tensions in Dublin over the weekend.

The plans released involved an attempt to prevent any march along the
Quays, with detachments of gardai on bridges to push groups of
protestors into side streets (a clearly intimidatory statement). Those
who arrived at the meeting point for the march at Parkgate St. would be
met by the riot squad, with instructions to prevent demonstrators
congregating.

DGN, Harry Browne in the Evening Herald and the Irish Council for Civil
Liberties had all noted that these last instructions, which had been
cited in the Irish Times previously as part of police intentions, were
an infringement of the basic right to assembly and protest, which
involve precisely the congregation of demonstrators.

Garda [Irish police -ed.] claims that the march was not really banned
do not stand up to scrutiny. Details of our events had been very
publicly available, not least through the media, for over a month by
this point. Garda statements openly advertised the fact that its
intelligence unit was following websites. Yet we are asked to believe
that the Gardai had no knowledge that Parkgate St., where the riot
squad was placed with orders to prevent demonstrators gathering, was a
publicly announced starting point for a march which had attracted huge
media attention.

To the best of our knowledge, there has been no scrutiny of these Garda
claims. Yet the banning of a march is a very serious affair; it appears
that marches have not been banned since perhaps the 1970s. We had
hoped, following the banning of the march, that media archives could
clarify the history of restrictions on the freedom of protest in
Ireland, and wonder why this story is apparently insignificant.

We feel that following the banning of the march it was absolutely
necessary to go ahead with a protest, albeit with a new starting point.
The 3-5,000 people who joined us on Saturday night clearly felt the
same way, and expressed this feeling in the meeting which was held
outside the GPO and which decided to march. The freedom of assembly and
opinion are too important to allow them to be incidentally suspended by
a briefing to a television programme which "just happens" to place the
riot squad at the assembly point for a nationally-organised march.

We noted at the time that the late date of the ban was highly
irresponsible and ran the risk of people arriving at Parkgate St. in
ignorance of police plans, and meeting the riot squad. Thankfully, this
does not seem to have occurred, although we have seen no reports either
way.

It is clear though that the militarisation of Dublin, the banning of
the march and the threat of the use of riot police significantly raised
tensions and created a highly confrontational situation. In plain
English, the last-minute message sent out via Prime Time ran: if you
try to march, we will disperse you forcibly. And this is of course
precisely what happened on Saturday night.

2. The policing of the Farmleigh march

In a democratic society, the freedom of assembly and opinion is not an
added extra or a minor annoyance, as some commentators have suggested.
It is fundamental to the maintenance of civil society and democratic
debate. It is used not only by DGN, but by nurses, taxi drivers,
farmers and on occasion even by members of An Garda Siochána.

That force as a whole, and the state, have a duty under the European
Convention on Human Rights to facilitate and protect peaceful protest.
And yet what we saw on Saturday night were severe injuries inflicted on
members of the public, attempts to cause a panic, the arrests of those
who were attempting to lower tensions and denial of basic rights to
access to hospitals, telephones for those arrested and bail to those
granted bail. In order:

(a) General issues

Much of the media coverage of Saturday night’s events have
misrepresented them as a riot. They were not, and the trivial nature of
the charges brought - breach of the peace, refusal to obey the
instructions of a garda - underline this. (There was however a real
riot over the weekend, at the Rally of the Lakes in Killarney, at which
more people were arrested than in connection with the whole May Day
weekend: strangely, it has not received much coverage although it has
been mentioned in the Dáil*.)

The main story is surely that between 3 and 5,000 people found the
courage to march in the face of the ban and the threat of the riot
police, in defence of the freedom of assembly and opinion and as a
protest against privatisation, militarisation and "Fortress Europe". A
secondary story is surely that the police did indeed attack citizens on
the Navan Road, injuring several and arresting two dozen. Yet media
attention has largely ignored both of these stories in favour of a
focus on the alleged actions of a small number of protestors.

There have been some very strange suggestions made in this context, of
which we can highlight two. One is that of collective guilt: that if
one person does something wrong, that fact justifies the police
engaging in any amount of violence towards other people. The other is
that of the "wild dog" police: that somehow the Gardai are more easily
provoked than other people, and anyone who challenges them in any way
ought to know that they are risking their skin in doing so. We find
this latter suggestion curiously ambiguous.

Dublin Grassroots Network had issued guidelines for Saturday’s march
which stated our intention for a non-confrontational approach. In
accordance with these guidelines, our banners remained 200 yards from
police lines. A number of protestors who rejected those guidelines went
beyond our march and towards police lines, carrying a banner.

We want to note however that this group did not pose any real threat to
the 5,000 police assembled to prevent the march (nor was any attempt
made to arrest them), and that the Garda Press Office has only been
able to claim one minor injury in relation to the entire weekend’s
events.

We therefore stand by our earlier statements that the decision to pull
back uniformed gardai and send in the riot squad within two minutes of
the banner mentioned above arriving at police lines was
disproportionate and heavy-handed. The injuries to citizens, and the
near-panic, which resulted from this are the responsibility of the
Minister of Justice.

(b) Injuries to protestors

The members of the riot squad occasioned a number of serious injuries
to protestors. In particular, two people sustained severe skull
injuries, with two other more minor head wounds. Two arms were broken,
as well as one wrist (damaged by water cannon) and a number of fingers.
DGN will be releasing further details from the medical team at our
press conference. In an earlier press release we stated that one
arrested protestor had a broken leg. Since his release on bail it has
transpired that this was not in fact the case.

Indymedia Ireland has released two short videos, one showing a member
of the riot squad attacking protestors moving away from police lines
(http://www.indymedia.ie/attachments/may2004/policeviolence1.mpg) and
one showing the water cannon attempting to push journalists off the
high wall to the south of the road, and succeeding in forcing one
person to the ground, who lost consciousness as a result
(http://www.indymedia.ie/attachments/may2004/policeviolence2.mpg).
Further camera evidence of police violence is widely available on
Indymedia.

A DGN activist attempted to drive the two protestors with head injuries
to the Mater hospital. Members of the gardai blocked their way on the
road and prevented this, despite it being clearly visible that the
passengers were seriously injured. This incident was misreported in
earlier press comments as though access had been denied at the doors of
the hospital, which was not the case. The two eventually secured
treatment. Given the nature of their injuries, however, this behaviour
on the part of gardai was extremely irresponsible and would have
attracted severe censure had they been ordinary citizens.

(c) Arrests and attempts to cause a panic

The behaviour of the riot squad - not only the baton charges but the
use of simulated baton charges - was clearly designed to frighten the
crowd, and, in the circumstances of Saturday night, came close to
causing a panic. DGN activists, who had gone beyond the DGN banner on
their own responsibility in order to calm the crowd, found themselves
in the bizarre situation of trying to stop a panic which the police
were trying to cause. We ask who was responsible for the breach of the
peace in this case.

Similarly, the trivial nature of the charges brought highlights the
non-threatening behaviour of those actually arrested. Many of those
arrested are people who either sat down at the first sign of police
violence, in order to lower tensions and prevent a panic, or who raised
their hands in the air and called out "This is a peaceful protest!" It
is interesting that those targeted for arrest were those who were
trying to calm a volatile situation.

We mentioned in Sunday’s press statement the case of a DGN activist who
helped to form a line of people with linked arms, walking away from the
riot police. Again, the purpose was to calm the situation and move back
towards town. This line soon became the back line and the riot squad
moved in behind it at a speed which was too fast.

DGN members said precisely this to members of the riot squad, that they
were unable to move the crowd any faster. Not only were they ignored:
our friend was pulled out of the line, first by his bag and then by his
feet being swept from under him. He was pulled under the line of riot
shields and arrested.

Dublin Grassroots Network has nothing but admiration for those who put
themselves at risk from arrest and truncheons in this situation,
attempting to calm the situation. We can only ask how it is that
ordinary people, under extreme stress, can behave so well while the
supposedly highly-trained riot squad attempted to cause a panic,
disrupted attempts to move the crowd away and arrested protestors who
were trying to lower tensions.


3. Denial of legal rights following arrest

We have heard much over the past few days of the importance of
respecting the rule of law. Not only did the policing of this event
fail to respect basic democratic freedoms, as outlined above, and the
human right of physical integrity; on several occasions subsequent to
Saturday’s protest ordinary legal rights were ignored or overruled.

Firstly, although the arrests on the Navan Road took place between 8.30
and 10 pm on Saturday night, some protestors at least were denied their
right to make a phone call until after the special court hearing that
night. (We believe that this may have been the case for all protestors,
in that not one call was placed to our Legal Support hotline until the
early hours of Sunday morning.) This was a very clear denial of basic
legal rights, and may have contributed to some protestors being unable
to gain consent to bail until the High Court decision on Wednesday.

Secondly, as the papers over the last two days have made clear, the
District Court on Wednesday morning refused to grant bail to those who
had not already been granted it on Saturday night (in all probability,
these were those who had been most disadvantaged by refusal of the
right to make a phone call). Had it not been for an immediate appeal to
the High Court these people would still be in custody for extremely
minor offences. In yesterday’s press release we observed that in the
same sitting not only was bail granted to a person accused of
possession of cocaine with intent to supply and a person accused of
domestic violence, but also to a person accused of other public order
offences including assaulting a garda.


4. Conclusion

Dublin Grassroots Network notes that despite the wilfully endangering
behaviour of the security forces over the weekend and a month of
disinformation and scaremongering, large numbers of people participated
in all the weekend’s protest events.

People took responsibility for themselves and each other under very
difficult conditions, and in so doing have acted more responsibly than
the police. The weekend’s events underlined the strength of our vision
of a world of grassroots democracy: the Government spent €3.9m on PR
while we spent a couple of thousand euro on leaflets. The Government
spent, we are told, €7.5m on overtime alone and perhaps €15m on the
entire security operation. And yet ordinary people, taking action on
their own behalf, behaved more responsibly and made a more effective
political statement than all the resources of the state.

After a multi-million euro security operation, fewer people were
arrested than after the Rally of the Lakes in Killarney the same
weekend, and charges were very minor. Clearly the Government now wishes
to minimise the extent of political protest - having spent much of the
past month feeding the media with panic stories about the hordes of
foreign agitators who wanted to burn Dublin to the ground.

The reasons why are clear in both cases. This is a deeply unpopular
Government, facing elections. Since the rejection of the Nice Treaty in
the last free vote the Irish people were given on the direction of the
EU, it is also clear that the policies the EU is following -
privatisation, militarisation and "Fortress Europe" - are meeting with
more and more opposition.

This is why we are seeing the criminalisation of protest, why the
Government wanted to intimidate people from taking part in the
weekend’s events and why it is now seeking to minimise the extent of
popular participation in those events.

We want to underline the responsibility of the Depts. of Justice and
Defence, and ultimately of the entire Cabinet, in the attempt to
suspend basic civil liberties and criminalise protest. The Taoiseach**
has made his opposition to protest clear in comments before the event
which described all those involved as "mindless hooligans". But the
hooligans, as at Reclaim the Streets two years ago, were wearing police
helmets, riot shields and wielding batons.

No doubt the Government would prefer people not to take an active part
in democracy, and indeed Bertie Ahern has asked people not to protest
when George Bush visits in June, for his summit with those EU leaders
involved in the war (and torture) in Iraq. Unfortunately for Bertie,
but thankfully for democracy, people are not so willing to abandon
freedoms which took centuries to achieve.

Our weekend began as a weekend of opposition to EU policies in the area
of privatisation, militarisation, "Fortress Europe" and social justice.
We believe the events of the weekend show that serious opposition to
such policies will be met with violence: the same violence that May Day
protestors in Poland have been experiencing.

Profits and policing are being globalised, while "Fortress Europe"
kills more people on its borders than the Berlin Wall ever did. Ireland
hosts a "Day of Welcomes" while the old European states all place
restrictions on citizens from the new states and the Government forges
ahead with plans for a racist referendum.

The reality is that neo-liberalism, the "war on terror" and racist
immigration policies can only be defended through increasingly
undemocratic means. They have nothing to offer ordinary people except
fewer and more expensive services, more policing and more midnight
deportations. To protest against these policies is to see your marches
banned, your leafleting prevented, your friends clubbed and your
activists arrested.

We believe that people have shown by their actions last weekend that
they understand that the freedom of assembly and the freedom of opinion
are not a gift of Government, to be withdrawn by a briefing to Prime
Time. They have been gained over hundreds of years of struggles for
democracy and human rights. And the people who came with us on the
Navan Road, in the face of the ban, in the face of the riot squad, and
who looked after each other in the face of police violence, deserve our
thanks.


PART II

"Dirty tricks" and the militarisation of policing in advance of the May
Day weekend

Details prepared by DGN on Thursday, April 29th (before the banning of
the Farmleigh march) and released on Friday, May 30th at our press
conference.

Reproduced verbatim for the record.

Aisling Reidy of the Irish Council for Civil Liberties noted earlier
this week that they were "very concerned that Gardai, through stories
fed to the media, is [sic] trying to soften up public opinion for a
show down, by talking of potential violence and well planned attacks by
subversives". She observed that the Garda Siochana is in fact legally
obliged to allow and protect peaceful protests.

These comments do not appear to have been heard by senior levels of the
security forces, or by the Minister for Justice. We have to ask who
ultimately benefits from the climate of tension which such activities
have created. Political responsibility certainly lies with an unpopular
government which lost the last free vote on European affairs (the first
vote on the Nice Treaty, which faced protests of 100,000 people last
year over its support for war and which has been facing widespread
direct action in response to its attempts to impose bin charges?


"Dirty tricks": behaviour in bad faith

* Stated intention to use undercover police officers within
demonstrations, despite the involvement of such officers in provocation
at the G8 summit protests in Genoa (see
http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/engEUR300122001!Open for a
statement of Amnesty International’s concerns about the policing of
Genoa)

* Encouraging businesses to shut over the weekend and feeding this
story to the media as an example of spontaneous concerns (see
http://www.indymedia.ie/newswire.php?story_id=64654 for minute of a
meeting with the Assistant Commissioner and the City Centre
Businessman’s Association as part of this strategy).

* Unfounded claims about plans for an "attack" on the Blanchardstown
shopping centre

* Harassment of Dublin Grassroots door-to-door leafletters, despite
their legal right to do so (see
http://www.indymedia.ie/newswire.php?story_id=64499 for an eyewitness
account)

* Stopping and questioning of activists after buying onions (!) in
Moore Street market (quote: "onions could be used as missiles")

* Arrest and detention of 2 activists on Thursday morning for hours
despite their possession of passports and bank cards to prove ID

* Videotaping of passengers arriving at Connolly from the Belfast train

* Refusal to grant permission for the Another Europe is Possible march
(this decision has been appealed)

* Continuous generation of scare stories about "unrest" designed to
justify the militarisation of policing, despite consistent lack of
evidence.


The militarisation of policing

* The use of the army, armed Gardai, rubber bullets/"non-lethal
weaponry", water cannon, razor wire etc. to police a peaceful protest

* Implication of "collective punishment" in comments such as those of
Garda Complaints Board chief Gordon Holmes, which seem to suggest that
if some protestors cause trouble, all deserve police violence
(Examiner, 27.4.04)

* Discussion of temporary detention centres and the intimidatory
clearing of a wing of Cloverhill prison for protestors

* The stated aim to prevent large groups of protestors gathering (Irish
Times, 19.04.04; see also Harry Brown’s comments in the Evening Herald,
23.4.04)

* The closure of the Phoenix Park for the first time in its history

* Calls to suspend freedom of travel by Lord Mayor Royston Brady


This amounts to a virtual suspension of the constitution. We also note
that the security forces are clearly acting in bad faith: if half of
their allegations were justified, we would have expected charges to be
brought against the organisers. Instead we have seen very few ministers
or official spokespeople willing to appear in public, but widespread
use of crime correspondents, ex-policemen, representatives of Garda
trade unions GRA and AGSI, "security consultants" etc. to represent the
view of the security forces and ultimately of the Government.


ENDS


* Lower house of Irish parliament
** Irish head of government


*******
********
****** The A-Infos News Service ******
News about and of interest to anarchists
******
INFO: http://ainfos.ca/org http://ainfos.ca/org/faq.html
HELP: a-infos-org@ainfos.ca
SUBSCRIPTION: send mail to lists@ainfos.ca with command in
body of mail "subscribe (or unsubscribe) listname your@address".

Options for all lists at http://www.ainfos.ca/options.html


A-Infos Information Center