A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **

News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Castellano_ Català_ Deutsch_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_ All_other_languages _The.Supplement
{Info on A-Infos}

(en) Incredible turnout at Dublin anti-war march - but what do we do now?

From "Andrew" <andy@dojo.tao.ca>
Date Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:35:04 +0100 (CET)

      A - I N F O S  N E W S  S E R V I C E

Saturday 15 February saw the largest demonstration in Dublin in two decades
and by far the largest anti-war demonstration in Ireland ever. The crowds were
impossible for one person to count but estimates of the turnout range from
80,000 (Gardai), to 100,000 (TV3, Irish Times, Irish Independent) to 130,000
(Indymedia.ie) to 150,000 plus. Whatever the actual number this and the
opinion polls published on the same day demonstrate that opposition to the war
in Ireland is overwhelming.

The Dublin march (for this was also one in Belfast which drew around 15,000)
started at the usual location, the Garden of Remembrance at the top of Parnell
Square. Generally most marches fit onto the open area of patio in front of the
gates there. This did not. It spilled out onto the road and then back around
the wide roads of Parnell Square and down to O'Connell St. That was one
jam-packed solid mass of people. From the Parnell statue on down O'Connell St.
it was less dense but it still was fairly packed with people waiting to join
the march on both sides of Parnell Street itself and all around the base of
the statue. And from a high point near the statue I could see that the waiting
crowd filled both sides of O'Connell St. right down as far as the newly
erected spike.

Moving through this mass was difficult so that was the best view I was to get
all day. Another indication of the size of the march was that although, as
usual, the left parties had mass-produced placards topped with their party
name I hardly saw any of these all day. The enormous turnout had caught
everyone by surprise. The crazy optimists of Friday who talked of a turnout of
30,000 were revealed as deep pessimists, just a lot less pessimistic then
those of us who though 10,000 was a more advisable figure to speak of in
advance of the day.

Pic: A 280 degree montage from near the Parnell monument of part of the
demonstration [See web version of report at

If there is any reality to the claim that parliamentary democracy works then
it is clear that the government had no choice but to end the refuelling of US
warplanes at Shannon and to oppose the US drive for war in the UN. Perhaps
this is what will happen but my advice is not to hold your breath. Mondays
Irish Independent quotes unnamed 'government sources' on its front page who
say even if Bush goes to war without a UN mandate the government will continue
to allow refuelling to take place at Shannon. This despite the fact that polls
shows well over 70% oppose refuelling in those circumstances! The Irish Times
had also been quoting similar 'government sources' last week.

Even to an anarchist who realises the Dail does not represent real democracy
the course the government is heading on seems crazy. The pandora's box the
government are opening by continuing to refuel US war planes is neatly
illustrated in the statement by an Irish Times columnist covering the march
that the 'Irish Anti War Movement' (IAWM) chairperson, Richard Boyd-Barrett
(who is also a leader of the Leninist 'Socialist Workers Party') could "now
make a plausible claim to be the Real Taoiseach". If the government so
obviously ignores the will of the people and allows refuelling to continue
then a very sensible conclusion would be for those who took part in the march
to draw revolutionary conclusions.

Here though is the weakness of the bulk of the Irish anti-war movements. They
want to 'Stop refuelling at Shannon' but they have not only failed to start a
discussion of how this can be done if the government refuses to end
refuelling, they have actively worked to isolate those who have started such a
discussion. Roger Cole of the Peace And Neutrality Alliance (PANA) is widely
quoted as saying at the rally that US planes should be driven out of Shannon
as St Patrick drove out the snakes. But in reality PANA like the IAWM have
refused to back direct actions at Shannon and seem therefore to imagine that
the snakes left because they were politely asked to. Despite formal requests
to the organisers in advance of the march there was no speaker to explain the
point of view of those of us who argue for direct action.

If, as it appears likely, the government refuses to stop refuelling then
direct action is the only road left to those who oppose the war. People are
very open to this argument, on the demonstration we were distributing papers
and leaflets obviously arguing for direct action and got an eager response
from the crowd. Regularly I was surrounded by people literally queuing up to
the material. On the march itself the Direct Action blocks chants 'They have
bombers, we have axes, they kill children, we smash planes" in support of
those jailed for smashing up war planes at Shannon got a good response.

Pics: Hammers carried in support of the Catholic Worker 5 (who disarmed a
plane with real hammers)

But we still need to recognise that this is a new argument for the vast
majority of those who went on the march. Winning them over to not only support
for but also participation in direct action requires a major effort by all who
are serious about opposing the war. This is a need that goes far beyond 'party
loyalty' and the positions that people have adopted in public to date.
Before the march there was a national meeting of the direct action block to
discuss where we should go. Two very important things came out of that meeting.

The first was that we have moved beyond the stage where small groups of people
clandestinely organise to scale the fence and disarm individual planes. Those
who have done so already had played a heroic role and contributed massively to
building the anti-war movements. But now we need to be much more ambitious and
to seriously aim at an action involving thousands of people tearing down the
fence and entering the airfield - thus forcing it to shutdown on safety grounds.

The second was that we recognised that to mobilise this number of people we
have to dispense with trying to keep our general plans secret from the forces
of the state. We are not trying to outwit them; we are seeking simply to
outnumber them to the extent that they cannot stop us taking action.
>From this it was decided to make a very public call for direct action at
Shannon airport on March 1st. And that we would publicise the form of this
action, the plan is simply to march up the approach from the gate, form an
enormous line along this road and walk to and dismantle the airport perimeter
fence. Once the fence is down we will advance into the airfield so it has to
be shut down but (for safety reasons) we will not go as far as the runway.
This action will be non-violent (apart from anything else the presence of the
army with live ammunition makes this a requirement!) but will be militant.
Those taking part in it will be risking arrest and perhaps physical attack by
the forces of the state. But if there are thousands of us doing this they
cannot stop us.

Only a few hundred people are, in any sense, part of the Grassroots Gathering
network that is calling for this action. So it cannot succeed unless the
thousands of others who are part of the various anti-war movements and those
who have not aligned themselves with any group take part. Already the IAWM has
indicated that they will mobilise for a demonstration at Shannon at the same
day. Right now they don't intend to take part in the direct action but perhaps
between now and then they will become more open to this.

Other forms of direct action are also possible. In particular the enormous
demonstrations should give greater confidence to workers at the airport who do
not want to be part of the supply chain for Bush's war. With SIPTU having
adopted an anti-war position they are in a strong position to emulate the
anti-apartheid Dunnes Stores workers and refuse to handle any war related work
at the airport. Whereas thousands are needed to stop refuelling at the airport
in a mass action the individual action of a relatively small number of airport
workers could achieve the same thing. If this happens we must be prepared to
support these workers not simply from short-term reprisals but also from
longer-term job losses which the government might try and impose as punishment.

It is likely that war will officially start soon after March 1st. Time is
short if we want to have an actual impact on the war and not simply be content
with collective washing of hands. Direct action at Shannon has already had an
impact both in terms of grounding aircraft and forcing World Airlines to
transfer 17 flights out of the airport. If the government refuses to sop
refuelling then March 1st will give us the chance to show we do have power,
and in acting for ourselves take a major step towards tacking Ireland out of
the war.

New global anarchist index

3000 + pages on anarchism, Ireland, Zapatistas
revolutionary history and struggles around globalisation

>From the
ainriail mailing list
Join at

       ****** The A-Infos News Service ******
      News about and of interest to anarchists
  COMMANDS: lists@ainfos.ca
  REPLIES: a-infos-d@ainfos.ca
  HELP: a-infos-org@ainfos.ca
  WWW: http://www.ainfos.ca/
  INFO: http://www.ainfos.ca/org

-To receive a-infos in one language only mail lists@ainfos.ca the message:
                unsubscribe a-infos
                subscribe a-infos-X
 where X = en, ca, de, fr, etc. (i.e. the language code)

A-Infos Information Center